Megan C. Evans

Better planning outcomes requires clear consideration of costs, condition and conservation benefits, and access to the best available data: reply to Gosper et al., 2016

Hugh P. Possingham, Kerrie A. Wilson, Ayesha I. T. Tulloch, 2016 .

The development of the Australian environmental offsets policy: from theory to practice

Hugh P. Possingham, Philip Gibbons, Stefan Kraus, 2015, Environmental Conservation.

Estimating species response to management using an integrated process: A case study from New South Wales, Australia

Helen Mayfield, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Martine Maron, 2020, Conservation Science and Practice.

Improving averted loss estimates for better biodiversity outcomes from offset exchanges

Martine Maron, Ascelin Gordon, Megan C. Evans, 2020, Oryx.

Frontiers inEcology and the Environment Why do we map threats ? Linking threat mapping with actions to make better conservation decisions

Hugh P. Possingham, James E. M. Watson, Hugh P. Possingham, 2015 .

Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally

Hugh P. Possingham, Kerrie A. Wilson, Luigi Boitani, 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

A Loss‐Gain Calculator for Biodiversity Offsets and the Circumstances in Which No Net Loss Is Feasible

David B. Lindenmayer, Hugh P. Possingham, Philip Gibbons, 2016 .

Locking in loss: Baselines of decline in Australian biodiversity offset policies

Ascelin Gordon, Martine Maron, Megan C. Evans, 2015 .

What to do in the face of multiple threats? Incorporating dependencies within a return on investment framework for conservation

Hugh P. Possingham, Kerrie A. Wilson, Megan C. Evans, 2011 .

The many meanings of no net loss in environmental policy

James E. M. Watson, Fabien Quétier, Ascelin Gordon, 2018, Nature Sustainability.