Lina Kong Win Chang

发表

Table 5, Examples of device-specific information that appeared in the discussion section of systematic reviews

Gowri Raman, James M Gaylor, Madhumathi Rao, 2012 .

Table 1, Identified evidence gaps organized by relevant Key Question and PICOD element

Lina Kong Win Chang, Katrin Uhlig, Kamal Patel, 2012 .

Figure 2, SharePoint homepage: Diagnosis

Denish Moorthy, Lina Kong Win Chang, Kamal Patel, 2012 .

Table 7, Percentage of correct extractions, per item and language, adjusted for individual's likelihood of correctly extracting the same data item from English articles

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2013 .

Figure 2, Histograms of the percent agreement for eligibility criteria items, by language

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Table 2, Translation time, by language

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Figure 6, Histograms of the percent agreement for descriptions of outcomes items, by language

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Figure 1, Histograms of the percent agreement for all items, by language

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Figure 8, Histograms of the percent agreement for continuous results items, by language

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

[Table], Shading of cells matches reported percentages

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2013 .

Figure 1, Analytic framework for SMBP with evidence gaps

Lina Kong Win Chang, Katrin Uhlig, Kamal Patel, 2012 .

Table 2, Summary of findings of studies addressing Key Questions on self-measured blood pressure monitoring

Ethan M Balk, Madhumathi Rao, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Table 10, Association between extractors' confidence in accuracy of translation and their extraction accuracy

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2013 .

Appendix Table E1, Reporting of characteristics in systematic reviews of implantable medical devices according to reported author affiliation

Gowri Raman, James M Gaylor, Madhumathi Rao, 2012 .

[Figure, Annotated Data Extraction Forms].

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Table 9, Reporting of handling of heterogeneity in systematic reviews by device categories

Gowri Raman, James M Gaylor, Madhumathi Rao, 2012 .

Appendix Table E3, Reporting characteristics in systematic reviews of implantable medical devices by study types

Gowri Raman, James M Gaylor, Madhumathi Rao, 2012 .

Table 3, Reporting of literature searches, study selection, and results in systematic reviews by device categories

Gowri Raman, James M Gaylor, Madhumathi Rao, 2012 .

Figure 4, Histograms of the percent agreement for study characteristics items, by language

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Table 1, Reporting items for systematic reviews of implantable medical devices

Gowri Raman, James M Gaylor, Madhumathi Rao, 2012 .

Figure 3, Sample discussion thread: Diagnosis

Denish Moorthy, Ethan M Balk, Jeffrey Chan, 2012 .

Figure 7, Histograms of the percent agreement for categorical results items, by language

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Figure 3, Histograms of the percent agreement for descriptions of treatment and control items, by language

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Table 6, Items with at least 80 percent agreement, by language and data extraction form section

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Table B, List of future research needs topics

Denish Moorthy, Lina Kong Win Chang, Kamal Patel, 2012 .

Table 11, Reporting of validity and generalizability information in systematic reviews by device categories

Gowri Raman, James M Gaylor, Madhumathi Rao, 2012 .

Table 4, Estimated additional time required compared to extraction of a similar English article

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2013 .

Table 4, Reporting of device- or operator-specific variables in systematic reviews of implantable medical devices

Gowri Raman, James M Gaylor, Madhumathi Rao, 2012 .

Table 1, Percentage of studies from Medline in various languages

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Table 10, Reporting of validity and generalizability information in systematic reviews of implantable medical devices

Gowri Raman, James M Gaylor, Madhumathi Rao, 2012 .

Table 8, Odds ratios (confidence intervals) compared with English of correct extractions, adjusted for individual's likelihood of correctly extracting the same data item from English articles

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2013 .

Table 4, Analyzed data extraction items, by section

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Table 7, Reporting of device- or operator-specific variables and handling of heterogeneity in systematic reviews by device categories

Gowri Raman, James M Gaylor, Madhumathi Rao, 2012 .

Table 6, Examples of poor translation, by language

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2013 .

Table 8, Reporting of handling of heterogeneity in systematic reviews

Gowri Raman, James M Gaylor, Madhumathi Rao, 2012 .

Table 5, Percent of items for which there was agreement, by language and data extraction form section

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Appendix Table E4, Reporting of characteristics in systematic reviews of implantable medical devices according to journal type

Gowri Raman, James M Gaylor, Madhumathi Rao, 2012 .

Table 3, Prioritized and other nominated topics for future research needs in SMBP research

Ethan M Balk, Lina Kong Win Chang, Katrin Uhlig, 2012 .

Figure 5, Histograms of the percent agreement for study methodology items, by language

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Table 3, Translation time (minutes), by language

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2013 .

Appendix Table E2, Reporting characteristics in systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) of implantable medical devices

Gowri Raman, James M Gaylor, Jeffrey Chan, 2012 .

Quality of Reporting in Systematic Reviews of Implantable Medical Devices

James M Gaylor, Lina Kong Win Chang, J. Lau, 2012 .

Accuracy of Data Extraction of Non-English Language Trials with Google Translate

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Data extraction from machine-translated versus original language randomized trial reports: a comparative study

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2013, Systematic Reviews.

Assessing the Accuracy of Google Translate to Allow Data Extraction From Trials Published in Non-English Languages

Ethan M Balk, Thomas A Trikalinos, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2013 .

Intravascular Diagnostic Procedures and Imaging Techniques Versus Angiography Alone in Coronary Artery Stenting: Comparative Effectiveness Review

Lina Kong Win Chang, Ramon C Iovin, J. Lau, 2013 .

Intravascular Diagnostic Procedures and Imaging Techniques Versus Angiography Alone in Coronary Stenting: Future Research Needs

Lina Kong Win Chang, Ramon C Iovin, S. Ip, 2013 .

Update on Mapping the Landscape of Genetic Tests for Non-Cancer Diseases/Conditions

Byron C. Wallace, James M Gaylor, Lina Kong Win Chang, 2012 .

Self-Measured Blood Pressure: Future Research Needs

Lina Kong Win Chang, Ramon C Iovin, K. Uhlig, 2012 .

Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labels from the FDA Web site

Byron C. Wallace, Lina Kong Win Chang, J. Lau, 2012 .

Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring: Comparative Effectiveness

James M Gaylor, Lina Kong Win Chang, K. Uhlig, 2012 .