Hans-Dieter Daniel

发表

Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2007, J. Informetrics.

Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2008 .

The effectiveness of the peer review process: inter-referee agreement and predictive validity of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie.

L. Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine

L. Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2007 .

Guardians of Science: Fairness and Reliability of Peer Review

Hans-Dieter Daniel, W. Russey, 1994 .

Functional use of frequently and infrequently cited articles in citing publications: A content analysis of citations to articles with low and high citation counts

L. Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2007 .

Publications as a measure of scientific advancement and of scientists' productivity

Hans-Dieter Daniel, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2005, Learn. Publ..

The Usefulness of Peer Review for Selecting Manuscripts for Publication: A Utility Analysis Taking as an Example a High-Impact Journal

L. Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2010, PloS one.

Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches

L. Bornmann, H. Marsh, Rüdiger Mutz, 2009 .

A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants

L. Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2010, PloS one.

The state of h index research

L. Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2009, EMBO reports.

Research assessment in the humanities: Introduction

Hans-Dieter Daniel, Sven E. Hug, Michael Ochsner, 2016 .

Criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities: a Delphi study among scholars of English literature, German literature and art history

Sven E. Hug, Hans-Dieter Daniel, M. Ochsner, 2013 .

Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments: effects of university prestige and field of study

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2006 .

Types of research output profiles: A multilevel latent class analysis of the Austrian Science Fund’s final project report data

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2012 .

The potential and problems of peer evaluation in higher education and research

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2007 .

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2010, PloS one.

Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2006, J. Informetrics.

Introducing and testing an advanced quantitative methodological approach for the evaluation of research centers: a case study on sustainability science

Omar Kassab, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2019, Research Evaluation.

What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2008, J. Documentation.

Guardians of science

B. Bederson, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 1993 .

Humanities Scholars’ Conceptions of Research Quality

Sven E. Hug, Hans-Dieter Daniel, M. Ochsner, 2016 .

Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis

L. Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2007, J. Informetrics.

Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review

L. Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2006, J. Informetrics.

Research assessment in the humanities: Towards criteria and procedures

Hans-Dieter Daniel, Sven E. Hug, Michael Ochsner, 2016 .

Reliability , fairness and predictive validity of committee peer review Evaluation of the selection of post-graduate fellowship holders by the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2004 .

Setting the stage for the assessment of research quality in the humanities. Consolidating the results of four empirical studies

Hans-Dieter Daniel, Sven E. Hug, Michael Ochsner, 2014 .

Assessment Criteria for Early Career Researcher's Proposals in the Humanities

Hans-Dieter Daniel, Sven E. Hug, Michael Ochsner, 2017, ISSI.

Four types of research in the humanities: Setting the stage for research quality criteria in the humanities

Hans-Dieter Daniel, Sven E. Hug, Michael Ochsner, 2012 .

A Framework to Explore and Develop Criteria for Assessing Research Quality in the Humanities

Hans-Dieter Daniel, Sven E. Hug, Michael Ochsner, 2012 .

Skewed citation distributions and bias factors: Solutions to two core problems with the journal impact factor

Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Rüdiger Mutz, 2012, J. Informetrics.

The manuscript reviewing process: Empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2010 .

The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2010, J. Informetrics.

The bibliometric quotient (BQ), or how to measure a researcher's performance capacity: A Bayesian Poisson Rasch model

Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Rüdiger Mutz, 2018, J. Informetrics.

University and student segmentation: multilevel latent-class analysis of students' attitudes towards research methods and statistics.

Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Rüdiger Mutz, 2013, The British journal of educational psychology.

Universality of citation distributions-A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

Criteria Used by a Peer Review Committee for Selection of Research Fellows: A Boolean Probit Analysis

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2005 .

Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

Data sorces for performing citation analysis

Hans-Dieter Daniel, Christoph Neuhaus, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2006 .

The publication and citation impact profiles of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts: A case study on the limitations of the Journal Impact Factor

Werner Marx, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Christoph Neuhaus, 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

The Journal Angewandte Chemie

Hans-Dieter Daniel, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2004 .

Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2010, J. Informetrics.

Research performance evaluation in the German university sector

Hans-Dieter Daniel, R. Fisch, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 1990, Scientometrics.

How Should We Measure Individual Researcher's Performance Capacity Within and Between Universities? - Social Sciences as an Example? A Multilevel Extension of the Bibliometric Quotient (BQ)

Hans-Dieter Daniel, Ruediger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2019, ISSI.

Guardians of science

Hans-Dieter Daniel, Benjamin Bederson, B. Bederson, 1993 .

The effect of the “very important paper” (VIP) designation in Angewandte Chemie International Edition on citation impact: A propensity score matching analysis

Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Tobias Wolbring, 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

In public peer review of submitted manuscripts, how do reviewer comments differ from comments written by interested members of the scientific community? A content analysis of comments written for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

L. Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, H. Joos, 2012, Scientometrics.

OPEN PEN ACCESS CCESS

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2008 .

What do we know about the h index?

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2011, J. Informetrics.

Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex‐ante and ex‐post peer evaluation data from the Austrian science fund

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry

Lutz Bornmann, Werner Marx, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2011, Scientometrics.

A new reference standard for citation analysis in chemistry and related fields based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts

Hans-Dieter Daniel, Christoph Neuhaus, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2009, Scientometrics.

Research and publication trends in experimental social psychology: 1971–1980—a thematic analysis of the journal of experimental social psychology, the european journal of social psychology, and the zeifschrift für soziaipsychologie

Hans-Dieter Daniel, R. Fisch, 1982 .

Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2012, Zeitschrift fur Psychologie.

Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2012, PloS one.

The generalized propensity score methodology for estimating unbiased journal impact factors

Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Rüdiger Mutz, 2012, Scientometrics.

Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry - Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts

Andreas Thor, Erhard Rahm, Lutz Bornmann, 2009, J. Informetrics.

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2006, Scientometrics.

Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2005, Scientometrics.

Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

The generalized propensity score methodology for estimating unbiased journal impact factors

Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2012, Scientometrics.

The effect of a two-stage publication process on the Journal Impact Factor: a case study on the interactive open access journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Christoph Neuhaus, 2010, Scientometrics.

Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index: Extent of and reasons for type I and type II errors

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2007, J. Informetrics.

Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2005, Scientometrics.

What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?

Lutz Bornmann, Werner Marx, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2012, J. Informetrics.

Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Irina Nast, 2008, Scientometrics.

Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2007, Scientometrics.

Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes

Lutz Bornmann, Werner Marx, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

How long is the peer review process for journal manuscripts? A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2010, Chimia.

Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use?

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Markus Wolf, 2012, Scientometrics.

Reliability of reviewers' ratings when using public peer review: a case study

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2010, Learn. Publ..

Are there really two types of h index variants? A validation study by using molecular life sciences data

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2009 .

Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/2012

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

Universality of citation distributions–A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator c f = c-c 0 at the micro level using data from chemistry

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2009 .

Data sources for performing citation analysis: an overview

Hans-Dieter Daniel, Christoph Neuhaus, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2008, J. Documentation.

The citation speed index: A useful bibliometric indicator to add to the h index

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2010, J. Informetrics.

A multilevel modelling approach to investigating the predictive validity of editorial decisions: do the editors of a high profile journal select manuscripts that are highly cited after publication?

Lutz Bornmann, Werner Marx, Rüdiger Mutz, 2011 .

Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2009, J. Informetrics.

New approaches for increasing the reliability of the h index research performance measurement

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Ruediger Mutz, 2009, 0908.3962.

Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measuresq

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2009 .

Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures?

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

The b index as a measure of scientific excellence. A promising supplement to the h index

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2007 .

Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2005 .

Cross-disciplinary research: What configurations of fields of science are found in grant proposals today?

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2015 .

From black box to white box at open access journals: predictive validity of manuscript reviewing and editorial decisions at Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Andreas Thor, Lutz Bornmann, Werner Marx, 2010 .

The influence of the applicants’ gender on the modeling of a peer review process by using latent Markov models

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2009, Scientometrics.

Concerning “An Evaluation of the Peer Review Process at Angewandte Chemie”

Hans-Dieter Daniel, P. F. Ross, 1993 .

Reviewer and editor biases in journal peer review: an investigation of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2009 .

Gatekeepers of science - Effects of external reviewers' attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2007, J. Informetrics.

Quality assurance in higher education – meta-evaluation of multi-stage evaluation procedures in Germany 1

L. Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, S. Mittag, 2006 .

Funding decision-making systems: An empirical comparison of continuous and dichotomous approaches based on psychometric theory

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2016 .

A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Christophe Weymuth, 2010, Scientometrics.

How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2008, J. Informetrics.

Seasonal bias in editorial decisions? A study using data from chemistry

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2011, Learn. Publ..

Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results

L. Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2008 .

The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews

Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel, L. Bornmann, 2009, Learn. Publ..

How to consider fractional counting and field normalization in the statistical modeling of bibliometric data: A multilevel Poisson regression approach

Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Rüdiger Mutz, 2019, J. Informetrics.