N. Dorans

发表

Further Comment: Freedle's Table 2: Fact or Fiction?

N. Dorans, 2004 .

Recentering and Realigning the SAT Score Distributions: How and Why.

N. Dorans, 2002 .

Fairness in Educational Assessment and Measurement

Linda L. Cook, N. Dorans, 2016 .

ETS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ITEM, TEST, AND SCORE FAIRNESS

N. Dorans, 2013 .

DIF DETECTION AND DESCRIPTION: MANTEL‐HAENSZEL AND STANDARDIZATION1,2

P. Holland, N. Dorans, 1992 .

Sources of Score Scale Inconsistency

Neil J. Dorans, Shelby J. Haberman, S. Haberman, 2011 .

The polyserial correlation coefficient

F. Drasgow, N. Dorans, U. Olsson, 1982 .

Distinctions Among Classes of Linkages

N. Dorans, 2000 .

6 Equating Test Scores

P. Holland, N. Petersen, N. Dorans, 2006 .

Equating, Concordance, and Expectation

N. Dorans, 2004 .

POPULATION INVARIANCE OF SCORE LINKING: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS TO ADVANCED PLACEMENT PROGRAM® EXAMINATIONS

Dorothy T. Thayer, P. Holland, B. Green, 2003 .

POPULATION INVARIANCE AND THE EQUATABILITY OF TESTS: BASIC THEORY AND THE LINEAR CASE

P. Holland, N. Dorans, 2000 .

Population Invariance and the Equatability of Tests: Basic Theory and The Linear Case

P. Holland, N. Dorans, 2000 .

CORRESPONDENCES BETWEEN ACT™ AND SAT® I SCORES

N. Dorans, 1999 .

Equating Methods and Sampling Designs

N. Dorans, 1990 .

Linking and aligning scores and scales

P. Holland, N. Dorans, Mary Pommerich, 2007 .

Linking Scores from Tests of Similar Content Given in Different Languages: Spanish Language PAA™ and English Language SAT® I. Research Report No. 2003-5. ETS RR-03-20.

Neil J. Dorans, Alicia S. Cascallar, N. Dorans, 2003 .

The Recentering of SAT Scales and Its Effects on Score Distributions and Score Interpretations

N. Dorans, 2002 .

Alternative weighting schemes for linear prediction

F. Drasgow, N. Dorans, 1978 .

Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test.

Neil J. Dorans, Edward Kulick, N. Dorans, 1986 .

THE STANDARDIZATION APPROACH TO ASSESSING DIFFERENTIAL SPEEDEDNESS

Neil J. Dorans, N. Dorans, A. Schmitt, 1988 .

Two New Approaches to Assessing Differential Item Functioning: Standardization and the Mantel--Haenszel Method

N. Dorans, 1989 .

Differential Item Functioning on the Mini-Mental State Examination: An Application of the Mantel-Haenszel and Standardization Procedures

Edward Kulick, N. Dorans, Edward Kulick, 2006, Medical care.

Estimators of the Squared Cross-Validity Coefficient: A Monte Carlo Investigation

Neil J. Dorans, Fritz Drasgow, Ledyard R Tucker, 1979 .

Robustness of Estimators of the Squared Multiple Correlation and Squared Cross-Validity Coefficient to Violations of Multivariate Normality

F. Drasgow, N. Dorans, 1982 .

EVALUATING HYPOTHESES ABOUT DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING1,2

P. Holland, N. Dorans, A. Schmitt, 1992 .

Using Past Data to Enhance Small Sample DIF Estimation: A Bayesian Approach

Edwin O. Blew, S. Sinharay, N. Dorans, 2009 .

Robustness of Weighted Differential Item Functioning ( DIF ) Analysis: The Case of Mantel–Haenszel DIF Statistics

N. Dorans, Hongwen Guo, Ru Lu, 2021, ETS Research Report Series.

Holland’s Advice for the Fourth Generation of Test Theory: Blood Tests Can Be Contests

N. Dorans, 2011 .

ASSESSING UNEXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL ITEM PERFORMANCE OF FEMALE CANDIDATES ON SAT AND TSWE FORMS ADMINISTERED IN DECEMBER 1977: AN APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDIZATION APPROACH1

Neil J. Dorans, Edward Kulick, N. Dorans, 1983 .

The Shrunken Generalized Distance Estimator of the Actual Error Rate in Discriminant Analysis

Neil J. Dorans, N. Dorans, 1988 .

THE EFFECTS OF VIOLATIONS OF UNIDIMENSIONALITY ON THE ESTIMATION OF ITEM AND ABILITY PARAMETERS AND ON ITEM RESPONSE THEORY EQUATING OF THE GRE VERBAL SCALE

Neil J. Dorans, Neal M. Kingston, N. Dorans, 1985 .

THE STABILITY OF THE SCORE SCALES FOR THE SAT REASONING TEST™ FROM 2005 TO 2010

N. Dorans, Jinghua Liu, Hongwen Guo, 2012 .

Sizing Up Linkages

N. Dorans, Michael E. Walker, 2007 .

An Assessment of the Dimensionality of SAT-Mathematical.

N. Dorans, I. Lawrence, 1987 .

Chapter 7 Contributions to the Quantitative Assessment of Item , Test , and Score Fairness

N. Dorans, 2017 .

Recent Challenges to Maintaining Score Comparability: A Commentary

S. Haberman, N. Dorans, 2022, Journal of Educational Measurement.

Linking Composite Scores: Effects of Anchor Test Length and Content Representativeness. Research Report. ETS RR-16-36.

Jonathan P. Weeks, N. Dorans, Peng Lin, 2016 .

Male-Female Differences in SAT-Verbal Ability Among Students of High SAT-Mathematical Ability.

Samuel A. Livingston, N. Dorans, 1987 .

Linking scores from multiple health outcome instruments

Neil J. Dorans, N. Dorans, 2007, Quality of Life Research.

IMPROVING THE STATISTICAL ASPECTS OF E‐RATER®: EXPLORING ALTERNATIVE FEATURE REDUCTION AND COMBINATION RULES

Neil J. Dorans, Bruce Kaplan, Liane N. Patsula, 2003 .

Improving the Statistical Aspects of e-rater

Neil J. Dorans, Bruce Kaplan, Hariharan Swaminathan, 2003 .

ASSESSING THE FALSIFIABILITY OF EXTREME LINKING

N. Dorans, Kyndra V. Middleton, 2011 .

Principles and Practices of Test Score Equating

N. Dorans, Tim Moses, D. Eignor, 2010 .

MANI EL-HAENSZEL AND STANDARDIZATION

P. Holland, N. Dorans, 2012 .

THE FEASIBILITY OF USING ITEM RESPONSE THEORY AS A PSYCHOMETRIC MODEL FOR THE GRE APTITUDE TEST

Neal M. Kingston, N. Dorans, 1982 .

Detecting Item Drift in Large-Scale Testing.

Neil J. Dorans, Hongwen Guo, Frederic Robin, 2017 .

A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR ESTIMATING CONDITIONAL ITEM SCORE DIFFERENCES IN DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING (DIF) ASSESSMENTS

N. Dorans, Tim Moses, Jing Miao, 2010 .

A Comparison of Strategies for Estimating Conditional DIF

N. Dorans, Tim Moses, Jing Miao, 2010 .

Two Simple Approaches to Overcome a Problem With the Mantel-Haenszel Statistic: Comments on Wang, Bradlow, Wainer, and Muller (2008)

S. Sinharay, N. Dorans, 2010 .

SCORE EQUITY ASSESSMENT: DEVELOPMENT OF A PROTOTYPE ANALYSIS USING SAT® MATHEMATICS TEST DATA ACROSS SEVERAL ADMINISTRATIONS

N. Dorans, Jinghua Liu, 2009 .

SMALL‐SAMPLE DIF ESTIMATION USING LOG‐LINEAR SMOOTHING: A SIBTEST APPLICATION

N. Dorans, Tim Moses, Gautam Puhan, 2007 .

USING DIF DISSECTION METHOD TO ASSESS EFFECTS OF ITEM DELETION

N. Dorans, Yanling Zhang, Joy L. Matthews-López, 2005 .

Using Subpopulation Invariance to Assess Test Score Equity

N. Dorans, 2004 .

DIF Assessment for Polytomously Scored Items: A Framework for Classification and Evaluation

Neil J. Dorans, Maria T. Potenza, N. Dorans, 1995 .

Equity Assessment for Polytomously Scored Items: A Taxonomy of Procedures for Assessing Differential Item Functioning. Research Report RR-94-49.

Maria T. Potenza, N. Dorans, 1994 .

CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE AND DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING: A PRAGMATIC APPROACH1

N. Dorans, A. Schmitt, 1991 .

THE ROLE OF THE UNIT OF ANALYSIS IN DIMENSIONALITY ASSESSMENT

N. Dorans, I. Lawrence, 1999 .

REDUCED RANK CLASSIFICATION

N. Dorans, 1985 .

Impact of Categorization and Scaling on Classification Agreement and Prediction Accuracy Statistics

N. Dorans, Wei Wang, 2021, ETS Research Report Series.

Concordance Between SAT I and ACT Scores for Individual Students

Neil J. Dorans, N. Dorans, Dianne Schneider, 1999 .

An Assessment of the Dimensionality of Three SAT-Verbal Test Editions

Linda L. Cook, N. Dorans, D. Eignor, 1988 .

Fairness in Test Design and Development MICHAEL J . ZIEKY

Neil J. Dorans, Linda L. Cook, N. Dorans, 2016 .

THE VALUE OF THE STUDIED ITEM IN THE MATCHING CRITERION IN DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING (DIF) ANALYSIS

N. Dorans, X. Tan, Y. Qu, 2010 .

Item Location Effects and Their Implications for IRT Equating and Adaptive Testing

Neal M. Kingston, N. Dorans, 1984 .

The Contestant Perspective on Taking Tests: Emanations From the Statue Within

N. Dorans, 2012 .

THE INTERNAL CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE SAT1

N. Dorans, I. Lawrence, 1987 .

AN ASSESSMENT OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ASSUMPTION OF UNIDIMENSIONALITY AND THE QUALITY OF IRT TRUE‐SCORE EQUATING1,2,3

Linda L. Cook, N. Dorans, D. Eignor, 1985 .

Addressing the Extreme Assumptions of Presumed Linkings

N. Dorans, Kyndra V. Middleton, 2012 .

ALIGNING SCALES OF CERTIFICATION TESTS

N. Dorans, Gautam Puhan, Longjuan Liang, 2010 .

REVIEW OF COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING: A PRIMER (Second Edition) Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer (Second Edition)

Neil J. Dorans, Robert J. Mislevy, Bert F. Green, 2001 .

Concordance Between ACT Assessment and Recentered SAT I Sum Scores.

Mary Pommerich, Walter M. Houston, Neil J. Dorans, 1997 .

Using Weighted Sum Scores to Close the Gap Between DIF Practice and Theory

N. Dorans, Hongwen Guo, 2020, Journal of Educational Measurement.

A Note on Using Weighted Sum Scores in the P‐DIF Statistic

N. Dorans, Hongwen Guo, 2019, ETS Research Report Series.

Observed Scores as Matching Variables in Differential Item Functioning Under the One‐ and Two‐Parameter Logistic Models: Population Results

N. Dorans, Hongwen Guo, 2019, ETS Research Report Series.

CONSTRUCTED‐RESPONSE DIF EVALUATIONS FOR MIXED‐FORMAT TESTS

N. Dorans, Tim Moses, Jinghua Liu, 2013 .

Using Log-Linear Smoothing to Improve Small-Sample DIF Estimation.

N. Dorans, Tim Moses, Gautam Puhan, 2009 .

A REVIEW OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING

N. Dorans, Kyndra V. Middleton, Raymond Mapuranga, 2008 .

SMOOTHED STANDARDIZATION ASSESSMENT OF TESTLET LEVEL DIF ON A MATH FREE-RESPONSE ITEM TYPE1

J. Ramsay, N. Dorans, C. Lyu, 1995 .

EQUITY ASSESSMENT FOR POLYTOMOUSLY SCORED ITEMS: A TAXONOMY OF PROCEDURES FOR ASSESSING DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING1

Maria T. Potenza, N. Dorans, 1994 .

The Value of the Studied Item in the Matching Criterion in DIF Analysis

N. Dorans, X. Tan, Y. Qu, 2009 .

Implications for Altering the Context in Which Test Items Appear: A Historical Perspective on an Immediate Concern

Neil J. Dorans, Linda F. Leary, N. Dorans, 1985 .

An Example : Differences and Similarities in ACT and SAT ® I Content Specifications

N. Dorans, 2022 .

Item Response Theory, Item Calibration, and Proficiency Estimation

Neil J. Dorans, Howard Wainer, Bert F. Green, 2000 .

Simulate to Understand Models, Not Nature

N. Dorans, 2014 .

THE EFFECT OF THE POSITION OF AN ITEM WITHIN A TEST ON ITEM RESPONDING BEHAVIOR: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON ITEM RESPONSE THEORY

Neal M. Kingston, N. Dorans, 1982 .

Contributions to Score Linking Theory and Practice

N. Dorans, Gautam Puhan, 2017 .

Sensitivity of Equating Results to Different Sampling Strategies.

Linda L. Cook, N. Dorans, D. Eignor, 1990 .

A note on cross-validating prediction equations

Neil J. Dorans, Fritz Drasgow, F. Drasgow, 1980 .

The Standardization Approach to Assessing Comprehensive Differential Item Functioning

N. Dorans, A. Schmitt, Carole A. Bleistein, 1992 .

Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (second edition)

L. Steinberg, H. Wainer, B. Green, 2004, Quality of Life Research.

ON CORRELATIONS, DISTANCES AND ERROR RATES1

N. Dorans, 1985 .

THE SHRUNKEN GENERALIZED DISTANCE: A USEFUL CONCEPT FOR ESTIMATION OF THE ACTUAL ERROR RATE1,2

N. Dorans, 1984 .

Correspondences between ACT[superscript TM] and SAT[superscript R] I Scores. College Board Report No. 99-1. ETS RR No. 99-2.

Neil J. Dorans, N. Dorans, 1999 .

First Language of Examinees and Its Relationship to Equating. Research Report. ETS RR-09-05.

S. Sinharay, N. Dorans, Longjuan Liang, 2009 .

Equating Test Scores: Toward Best Practices

N. Dorans, Tim Moses, D. Eignor, 2009 .

USING THE SELECTION VARIABLE FOR MATCHING OR EQUATING1,2

N. Dorans, Nancy K. Wright, 1993 .

What Combination of Sampling and Equating Methods Works Best

Samuel A. Livingston, N. Dorans, Nancy K. Wright, 1989 .

A Comparison of Raw-to-Scale Conversion Consistency Between Single- and Multiple-Linking Using a Nonequivalent Groups Anchor Test Design

N. Dorans, Jinghua Liu, Hongwen Guo, 2014 .

Scaling and Equating

Howard Wainer, Bert F. Green, Robert J. Mislevy, 2000 .

Linking Scores From Tests of Similar Content Given in Different Languages: An Illustration Involving Methodological Alternatives

Alicia S. Cascallar, N. Dorans, 2005 .

Checking the Statistical Equivalence of Nearly Identical Test Editions

N. Dorans, I. Lawrence, 1990 .

THE EFFECTS OF ITEM REARRANGEMENT ON TEST PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Neil J. Dorans, Linda F. Leary, N. Dorans, 1982 .

Scores, Scales, and Score Linking

N. Dorans, 2018 .

A Single Population Litmus Test for Linear Scale Alignment Methods: Commentary on Kane, Mroch, Suh, and Ripkey

N. Dorans, 2010 .

USING CONFUSION INFUSION AND CONFUSION REDUCTION INDICES TO COMPARE ALTERNATIVE ESSAY SCORING RULES

N. Dorans, L. Patsula, 2003 .

Aggregate-Level Test-Scale Linking: A New Solution for an Old Problem?

Neil J. Dorans, Tim Moses, N. Dorans, 2020 .

Uncommon Measures Revisited

Neil J. Dorans, N. Dorans, 2020 .

Reliability and Measurement Precision

Neil J. Dorans, Howard Wainer, Bert F. Green, 2000 .

Using DIF Dissection To Assess Effects of Item Deletion Due to DIF on the Performance of SAT I: Reasoning Test Sub-populations.

N. Dorans, Yanling Zhang, Joy L. Matthews-López, 2003 .

Simulate to Understand Models , Not Nature December 2014 Research Report ETS RR – 14-16

N. Dorans, 2014 .