A. Biedermann

发表

C. Aitken, F. Taroni, S. Bozza, 2014 .

A formal approach to qualifying and quantifying the ‘goodness’ of forensic identification decisions

Paolo Garbolino, Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, 2018, Law, Probability and Risk.

Liberties and constraints of the normative approach to evaluation and decision in forensic science: a discussion towards overcoming some common misconceptions

C. Aitken, F. Taroni, A. Biedermann, 2014 .

The decisionalization of individualization.

F. Taroni, S. Bozza, A. Biedermann, 2016, Forensic science international.

Reconciliation of subjective probabilities and frequencies in forensic science

C. Aitken, F. Taroni, S. Bozza, 2018, Law, Probability and Risk.

The Role of the Subjectivist Position in the Probabilization of Forensic Science

Alex Biedermann, A. Biedermann, 2015 .

Decisional Dimensions in Expert Witness Testimony – A Structural Analysis

A. Biedermann, Kyriakos N. Kotsoglou, 2018, Front. Psychol..

Reply to Budowle, Ge, Chakraborty and Gill-King: use of prior odds for missing persons identifications

Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, Pierre Margot, 2012, Investigative Genetics.

Decision analysis for the genotype designation in low-template-DNA profiles.

F. Taroni, S. Bozza, A. Biedermann, 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

Decision theoretic properties of forensic identification: underlying logic and argumentative implications.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, F. Taroni, 2008, Forensic science international.

Digital evidence exceptionalism? A review and discussion of conceptual hurdles in digital evidence transformation

A. Biedermann, Kyriakos N. Kotsoglou, 2020, Forensic science international. Synergy.

Object-oriented Bayesian networks for evaluating DIP-STR profiling results from unbalanced DNA mixtures.

F. Taroni, A. Biedermann, G. Cereda, 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

ENFSI guIdElINE For EvaluatIvE rEportINg IN ForENSIc ScIENcE Strengthening the Evaluation of Forensic Results across Europe ( STEOFRAE

C. Champod, A. Biedermann, J. Kinder, 2015 .

Are Inconclusive Decisions in Forensic Science as Deficient as They Are Said to Be?

F. Taroni, S. Bozza, A. Biedermann, 2019, Front. Psychol..

Critical analysis of forensic cut-offs and legal thresholds: A coherent approach to inference and decision.

C. Aitken, F. Taroni, S. Bozza, 2018, Forensic science international.

Reframing the Debate: A Question of Probability, Not of Likelihood Ratio

C. Aitken, F. Taroni, S. Bozza, 2016 .

Letter to the Editor—Commentary on: Dror IG, Langenburg G. “Cannot decide”: The Fine Line Between Appropriate Inconclusive Determinations Versus Unjustifiably Deciding not to Decide. J Forensic Sci https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13854. Epub 2018 Jul 5

F. Taroni, S. Bozza, A. Biedermann, 2019, Journal of forensic sciences.

Prediction in forensic science: a critical examination of common understandings

F. Taroni, S. Bozza, A. Biedermann, 2015, Front. Psychol..

Drawbacks in the scientification of forensic science.

A. Biedermann, J. Curran, 2014, Forensic science international.

INFLUENCE DIAGRAMS FOR COMPLEX LITIGATION

J. Koehler, A. Biedermann, 2022 .

An investigation of the potential of DIP-STR markers for DNA mixture analyses.

F. Taroni, A. Biedermann, G. Cereda, 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

A Bayesian network approach to the database search problem in criminal proceedings

F. Taroni, A. Biedermann, J. Vuille, 2012, Investigative Genetics.

Reply to Hamer: The R v T controversy: forensic evidence, law and logic

C. Champod, F. Taroni, A. Biedermann, 2012 .

Commentary: Likelihood Ratio as Weight of Forensic Evidence: A Closer Look

C. Aitken, A. Nordgaard, F. Taroni, 2018, Front. Genet..

After uniqueness: the evolution of forensic science opinions

F. Taroni, A. Biedermann, W. Thompson, 2018 .

Analysing and exemplifying forensic conclusion criteria in terms of Bayesian decision theory.

F. Taroni, S. Bozza, A. Biedermann, 2017, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

Statistical Interpretation of Evidence: Bayesian Analysis

C. Aitken, F. Taroni, A. Biedermann, 2013 .

Reply to Morrison et al. (2016) Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.

I. Evett, C. Champod, F. Taroni, 2017, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

Commentary on "Dennis McNevin, Bayesian interpretation of discrete class characteristics, Forensic Sci. Int. 292 (2018) 125-130".

A. Biedermann, T. Hicks, 2019, Forensic science international.

Modeling the forensic two-trace problem with Bayesian networks

F. Taroni, S. Bozza, A. Biedermann, 2013, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

Normative decision analysis in forensic science

A. Biedermann, S. Bozza, F. Taroni, 2018, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

Bayes factor for investigative assessment of selected handwriting features.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, S Bozza, 2014, Forensic science international.

On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: response to Fenton et al.

Colin Aitken, Christophe Champod, Alex Biedermann, 2014, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

The subjectivist interpretation of probability and the problem of individualisation in forensic science.

Paolo Garbolino, Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, 2013, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

Data Analysis in Forensic Science A Bayesian Decision Perspective

Colin Aitken, Paolo Garbolino, Alex Biedermann, 2010 .

Probabilistic evidential assessment of gunshot residue particle evidence (Part II): Bayesian parameter estimation for experimental count data.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, S Bozza, 2011, Forensic science international.

DNA, statistics and the law: a cross-disciplinary approach to forensic inference

Joëlle Vuille, Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, 2014, Front. Genet..

Reframing the debate: A question of probability, not of likelihood ratio.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, S Bozza, 2016, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

Decision Theory, Relative Plausibility and the Criminal Standard of Proof

A. Biedermann, Kyriakos N. Kotsoglou, D. Caruso, 2020, Criminal Law and Philosophy.

Statistical Adhockeries Are No Criteria for Legal Decisions—The Case of the Expert Medical Report on the Assessment of Urine Specimens Collected Among Athletes Having Participated to the Vancouver and Sochi Winter Olympic Games

F. Taroni, S. Bozza, A. Biedermann, 2018, Front. Sociol..

Forensic drug intelligence: an important tool in law enforcement.

Alex Biedermann, Pierre Margot, Olivier Ribaux, 2007, Forensic science international.

Analysis and evaluation of magnetism of black toners on documents printed by electrophotographic systems.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, S Bozza, 2016, Forensic science international.

Probability and Inference in Forensic Science

F. Taroni, A. Biedermann, F. Taroni, 2014 .

Dismissal of the illusion of uncertainty in the assessment of a likelihood ratio

Colin Aitken, Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, 2016 .

Bayesian Networks for Probabilistic Inference and Decision Analysis in Forensic Science

Colin Aitken, Paolo Garbolino, Alex Biedermann, 2014 .

Analysis of sampling issues using Bayesian networks

Colin Aitken, Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, 2007 .

Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science

Colin Aitken, Paolo Garbolino, Alex Biedermann, 2006 .

Equal prior probabilities: can one do any better?

F Taroni, A Biedermann, P Garbolino, 2007, Forensic science international.

Decision-theoretic reflections on processing a fingermark.

F Taroni, S Gittelson, A Biedermann, 2013, Forensic science international.

Statistical hypothesis testing and common misinterpretations: Should we abandon p-value in forensic science applications?

F Taroni, A Biedermann, F. Taroni, 2016, Forensic science international.

Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: “Inconclusive” decisions and the structure of error rate studies

A. Biedermann, Kyriakos N. Kotsoglou, 2021, Forensic science international. Synergy.

The consequences of understanding expert probability reporting as a decision.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, S Bozza, 2017, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

The meaning of justified subjectivism and its role in the reconciliation of recent disagreements over forensic probabilism.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, C Aitken, 2017, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

Development of European standards for evaluative reporting in forensic science

Christophe Champod, Alex Biedermann, Sheila Willis, 2017 .

The Importance of Critically Examining the Level of Propositions When Evaluating Forensic DNA Results

Alex Biedermann, Tacha Hicks, A. Biedermann, 2016, Front. Genet..

Commentary on: Gauriot R, Gunaratnam L, Moroni R, Reinikainen T, Corander R. Statistical Challenges in the Quantification of Gunshot Residue Evidence. J Forensic Sci 2013;58(5);1149–55

Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, Matteo Gallidabino, 2015, Journal of forensic sciences.

Bayesian Networks and the Value of the Evidence for the Forensic Two‐Trace Transfer Problem *

Simone Gittelson, Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, 2012, Journal of forensic sciences.

Inadequacies of posterior probabilities for the assessment of scientific evidence

Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, F. Taroni, 2005 .

A general approach to Bayesian networks for the interpretation of evidence.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, P Garbolino, 2004, Forensic science international.

The use of the likelihood ratio for evaluative and investigative purposes in comparative forensic handwriting examination.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, S Bozza, 2012, Forensic science international.

Bayesian networks for evaluating forensic DNA profiling evidence: a review and guide to literature.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, F. Taroni, 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

A probabilistic approach to the joint evaluation of firearm evidence and gunshot residues.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, F. Taroni, 2006, Forensic science international.

The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.

A. Biedermann, F. Taroni, C. Champod, 2015, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

E-learning initiatives in forensic interpretation: report on experiences from current projects and outlook.

C Champod, F Taroni, A Biedermann, 2013, Forensic Science International.

Whose DNA is this? How relevant a question? (a note for forensic scientists).

Joëlle Vuille, Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.

Uncertainty about the true source. A note on the likelihood ratio at the activity level.

F. Taroni, S. Bozza, A. Biedermann, 2012, Forensic science international.

Problematic reporting in DNA cases: the need for accredited formats and certified reporting competence

Christophe Champod, Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, 2019 .

Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: A review.

Duncan Taylor, Alex Biedermann, Bas Kokshoorn, 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.

A template for constructing Bayesian networks in forensic biology cases when considering activity level propositions.

Christophe Champod, Duncan Taylor, Alex Biedermann, 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.

Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings.

Christophe Champod, Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, 2016, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

The role of prior probability in forensic assessments

William C. Thompson, Joëlle Vuille, Alex Biedermann, 2013, Front. Genet..

Forensic Science International: Synergy

A. Biedermann, Kyriakos N. Kotsoglou, 2021 .

Probabilistic evidential assessment of gunshot residue particle evidence (Part I): likelihood ratio calculation and case pre-assessment using Bayesian networks.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, S Bozza, 2009, Forensic science international.

Decision-theoretic analysis of forensic sampling criteria using bayesian decision networks.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, S Bozza, 2012, Forensic science international.

Evidential relevance in scene to offender transfer cases: development and analysis of a likelihood ratio for offence level propositions

Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, F. Taroni, 2011 .

The strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism

A. Biedermann, 2022, Forensic science international. Synergy.

Editorial: The Dialogue Between Forensic Scientists, Statisticians and Lawyers About Complex Scientific Issues for Court

A. Biedermann, S. Pope, 2020, Frontiers in Genetics.

Helping to distinguish primary from secondary transfer events for trace DNA.

Christophe Champod, Duncan Taylor, Alex Biedermann, 2017, Forensic science international. Genetics.

A template for constructing Bayesian networks in forensic biology cases when considering activity level propositions.

Duncan A. Taylor, C. Champod, A. Biedermann, 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.

The database search problem: a question of rational decision making.

F Taroni, S Gittelson, A Biedermann, 2012, Forensic science international.

Bayesian Networks and the Value of the Evidence for the Forensic Two‐Trace Transfer Problem *

F. Taroni, S. Bozza, A. Biedermann, 2012, Journal of forensic sciences.

Bayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams

F. Taroni, A. Biedermann, Max M. Houck, 2022 .

Bayesian decision networks

Colin Aitken, Paolo Garbolino, Alex Biedermann, 2014 .

The Logic of Inference and Decision for Scientific Evidence

F. Taroni, S. Bozza, A. Biedermann, 2021, Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law.

A formal approach to qualifying and quantifying the ‘goodness’ of forensic identification decisions

F. Taroni, S. Bozza, A. Biedermann, 2018, Law, Probability and Risk.

Commentary on : Gauriot R , Gunaratnam L , Moroni R , Reinikainen T , Corander R . Statistical challenges in the quantification of gunshot residue evidence

F. Taroni, A. Biedermann, Matteo Gallidabino, 2019 .

Your uncertainty, your probability, your decision

Alex Biedermann, A. Biedermann, 2013, Front. Genet..

Digital evidence, 'absence' of data and ambiguous patterns of reasoning

Alex Biedermann, Joëlle Vuille, A. Biedermann, 2016, Digit. Investig..

ENFSI guIdElINE For EvaluatIvE rEportINg IN ForENSIc ScIENcE Strengthening the Evaluation of Forensic Results across Europe ( STEOFRAE

C. Champod, A. Biedermann, J. Kinder, 2015 .

Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, S Bozza, 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

(Un-)Interpretability in Expert Evidence: An Inquiry into the Frontiers of Evidential Assessment

A. Biedermann, Kyriakos N. Kotsoglou, 2021, Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio.

Bayesian networks and probabilistic reasoning about scientific evidence when there is a lack of data.

F Taroni, A Biedermann, F. Taroni, 2006, Forensic science international.