M. Ganott

发表

Computer-aided detection in mammography: an assessment of performance on current and prior images.

Luisa P. Wallace, B. Zheng, D. Gur, 2002, Academic radiology.

Using computer‐extracted image phenotypes from tumors on breast magnetic resonance imaging to predict breast cancer pathologic stage

Erich P Huang, E. Burnside, M. Giger, 2016, Cancer.

MR Imaging Radiomics Signatures for Predicting the Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence as Given by Research Versions of MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, and PAM50 Gene Assays.

Erich P Huang, E. Burnside, C. Fan, 2016, Radiology.

Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings.

B. Zheng, H. Rockette, D. Gur, 2001, Radiology.

Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.

Luisa P. Wallace, H. Rockette, D. Gur, 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

The "laboratory" effect: comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations.

Luisa P. Wallace, Andriy I. Bandos, H. Rockette, 2008, Radiology.

Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment.

David Gur, Bin Zheng, Glenn S Maitz, 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.

David Gur, Andriy I Bandos, Margarita L Zuley, 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study.

David Gur, Andriy I Bandos, Margarita L Zuley, 2012, Academic radiology.

Rationale of Excisional Biopsy After the Diagnosis of Benign Radial Scar on Core Biopsy: A Single Institutional Outcome Analysis

A. Soran, M. Ganott, Yew-Ching Teh, 2013, American journal of clinical oncology.

High-dimensional regression analysis links magnetic resonance imaging features and protein expression and signaling pathway alterations in breast invasive carcinoma

E. Burnside, K. Brandt, A. Rao, 2018, Oncoscience.

Breast Imaging Modalities for Pathologists

J. Sumkin, C. Hakim, M. Ganott, 2012 .

A Prospective Study of Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening of Women with Dense Breasts in a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-based Practice.

Andriy I. Bandos, D. Gur, Amy Lu, 2020, Journal of breast imaging.

An Assessment of Performance on Current and Prior Images 1

Luisa P. Wallace, B. Zheng, D. Gur, 2002 .

Ultrasound Guided Core Biopsy versus Fine Needle Aspiration for Evaluation of Axillary Lymphadenopathy in Patients with Breast Cancer

Andriy I. Bandos, Amy E. Kelly, Gordon Abrams, 2014, ISRN oncology.

Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.

Andriy I. Bandos, Amy E. Kelly, D. Gur, 2019, Radiology.

Relationships Between Human-Extracted MRI Tumor Phenotypes of Breast Cancer and Clinical Prognostic Indicators Including Receptor Status and Molecular Subtype.

E. Burnside, M. Giger, K. Brandt, 2019, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

Screening mammography: do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer?

David Gur, Jill L King, Amy H Klym, 2006, Radiology.

Recall Rate Reduction with Tomosynthesis During Baseline Screening Examinations: An Assessment From a Prospective Trial.

David Gur, Andriy I Bandos, Margarita L Zuley, 2015, Academic radiology.

Can a limited double reading/second opinion of initially recalled breast ultrasound screening examinations improve radiologists' performances?

David Gur, Margarita L. Zuley, Christiane M. Hakim, 2018, Medical Imaging.

Recall and detection rates in screening mammography

David Gur, Luisa P. Wallace, Ratan Shah, 2004, Cancer.

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus supplemental Diagnostic Mammographic Views for evaluation of noncalcified Breast lesions 1

Andriy I. Bandos, Victor J. Catullo, Amy E. Kelly, 2012 .

Optimal reference mammography: a comparison of mammograms obtained 1 and 2 years before the present examination.

David Gur, Marie A Ganott, Jules H Sumkin, 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

The mammographic features of the postlumpectomy, postirradiation breast.

M. Ganott, K. M. Harris, C. Britton, 1989, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Frequency of carcinoma at secondary imaging-guided percutaneous breast biopsy performed after a high-risk pathologic result at primary biopsy.

M. Ganott, M. Zuley, S. Majewski, 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

Risk of malignancy when microscopic radial scars and microscopic papillomas are found at percutaneous biopsy.

J. Sumkin, M. Ganott, M. Zuley, 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

Radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of outcomes.

A. Soran, M. Ganott, M. Zuley, 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions.

David Gur, Andriy I Bandos, Margarita L Zuley, 2013, Radiology.

Agreement of the order of overall performance levels under different reading paradigms.

David Gur, Howard E Rockette, Amy H Klym, 2008, Academic radiology.

Binary and multi-category ratings in a laboratory observer performance study: a comparison.

David Gur, Howard E Rockette, Jill L King, 2008, Medical physics.

Silicone implant rupture: detection with US.

K M Harris, H. Losken, M. Ganott, 1993, Radiology.

Breast MRI radiomics: comparison of computer- and human-extracted imaging phenotypes

Maryellen L. Giger, Karen Drukker, Gary J. Whitman, 2017, European Radiology Experimental.

Evaluation of multiplanar reconstruction in CT recognition of lumbar disk disease.

J. Taveras, K. Davis, M. Ganott, 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

"Memory effect" in observer performance studies of mammograms.

David Gur, Christiane M Hakim, Marie A Ganott, 2005, Academic radiology.

Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography

Melinda J. Staiger, Marie A. Ganott, Peter L. Davis, 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

Augmentation mammoplasty: normal and abnormal findings with mammography and US.

K M Harris, M. Ganott, K. M. Harris, 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.

David Gur, Margarita L Zuley, Denise M Chough, 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: A subjective side-by-side review.

David Gur, Margarita L. Zuley, Christiane M. Hakim, 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study.

David Gur, Christiane M Hakim, Denise M Chough, 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading.

Jules Sumkin, Claudia Mello-Thoms, Lara Hardesty, 2005, Academic radiology.

Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?

David Gur, Howard E Rockette, Andriy I Bandos, 2010, Academic radiology.

Contrast-enhanced Mammography-guided Biopsy: Initial Trial and Experience

Amy E. Kelly, Amy Lu, J. Sumkin, 2023, Journal of Breast Imaging.

Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) Helps to Safely Reduce Benign Breast Biopsies for Low to Moderately Suspicious Soft Tissue Lesions.

Amy E. Kelly, D. Gur, Gordon Abrams, 2020, Academic radiology.

Quantitative computed tomography for spinal density measurement. Factors affecting precision.

R M Neer, M. Ganott, D. Rosenthal, 1985, Investigative radiology.

Breast Masses in the Augmentation Mammaplasty Patient: The Role of Ultrasound

H. Losken, M. Ganott, K. M. Harris, 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Effect of the Availability of Prior Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images on the Interpretation of Mammograms.

David Gur, Andriy I Bandos, Christiane M Hakim, 2015, Radiology.

Impact of and interaction between the availability of prior examinations and DBT on the interpretation of negative and benign mammograms.

D. Gur, Amy Lu, R. Shah, 2014, Academic radiology.

Breast Imaging and Image-Guided Biopsy Techniques

M. Ganott, S. Rudzinski, B. Griffith, 2016 .

Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Performance of Technologist-Performed Screening Breast Ultrasound After Tomosynthesis in Women With Dense Breasts (the DBTUST)

Amy E. Kelly, Cathy S. Tyma, Amy Lu, 2023, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Preliminary clinical evaluation of a high-resolution telemammography system.

D Gur, C M Hakim, J H Sumkin, 1997, Investigative radiology.

Interactive computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses: computerized selection of visually similar image sets from a reference library.

Claudia Mello-Thoms, David Gur, Bin Zheng, 2007, Academic radiology.

Actual versus intended use of CAD systems in the clinical environment

David Gur, Bin Zheng, Christiane M. Hakim, 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

A method to improve visual similarity of breast masses for an interactive computer-aided diagnosis environment.

David Gur, Bin Zheng, Amy Lu, 2005, Medical physics.

A Multisite Telemammography System for Remote Management of Screening Mammography: An Assessment of Technical, Operational, and Clinical Issues

David Gur, Glenn S. Maitz, Christiane M. Hakim, 2006, Journal of Digital Imaging.

Different Search Patterns and Similar Decision Outcomes: How Can Experts Agree in the Decisions They Make When Reading Digital Mammograms?

Claudia Mello-Thoms, Christiane M. Hakim, Jules H. Sumkin, 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

Matching breast masses depicted on different views a comparison of three methods.

David Gur, Bin Zheng, Denise M Chough, 2009, Academic radiology.