A. Stec

发表

teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance.

J. Doebley, A. Stec, C. Gustus, 1995, Genetics.

The evolution of apical dominance in maize

J. Doebley, A. Stec, L. Hubbard, 1997, Nature.

The limits of selection during maize domestication

Jody Hey, Rong-Lin Wang, Adrian Stec, 1999, Nature.

Functional analysis and development of a CRISPR/Cas9 allelic series for a CPR5 ortholog necessary for proper growth of soybean trichomes

R. Stupar, W. Parrott, D. Samac, 2019, Scientific Reports.

Screening populations for copy number variation using genotyping-by-sequencing: a proof of concept using soybean fast neutron mutants

R. Stupar, B. Boyle, F. Belzile, 2019, BMC Genomics.

Patterns of allozyme variation in cultivated and wild Sorghum bicolor

J. Doebley, K. Schertz, A. Stec, 1992, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

Genomic Heterogeneity and Structural Variation in Soybean Near Isogenic Lines

R. Shoemaker, R. Stupar, C. Vance, 2013, Front. Plant Sci..

Maize centromere mapping: a comparison of physical and genetic strategies.

H. Bass, A. Stec, O. Riera-Lizarazu, 2008, The Journal of heredity.

Teosinte glume architecture 1: A Genetic Locus Controlling a Key Step in Maize Evolution

J. Doebley, A. Stec, J. Kermicle, 1993, Science.

Genomic changes and biochemical alterations of seed protein and oil content in a subset of fast neutron induced soybean mutants

Devanand L. Luthria, R. Stupar, N. Islam, 2019, BMC Plant Biology.

Suppressor of sessile spikelets1 (Sosl): a dominant mutant affecting inflorescence development in maize

J. Doebley, A. Stec, B. Kent, 1995 .

Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte.

J. Doebley, A. Stec, 1991, Genetics.

A complete set of maize individual chromosome additions to the oat genome.

A. Stec, O. Riera-Lizarazu, R. Phillips, 2001, Plant physiology.

correction: The limits of selection during maize domestication

J. Doebley, J. Hey, A. Stec, 2001, Nature.

Expression of C4 photosynthetic enzymes in oat-maize chromosome addition lines

R. Kowles, C. Bernacchi, A. Stec, 2008 .

Addition of individual chromosomes of maize inbreds B73 and Mo17 to oat cultivars Starter and Sun II: maize chromosome retention, transmission, and plant phenotype

A. Stec, R. Phillips, H. Rines, 2009, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

Short Title: mPing-based Activation Tags

R. Stupar, T. Clemente, C. N. Hancock, 2020 .

Inheritance of Kernel Weight in Two Maize-Teosinte Hybrid Populations: Implications for Crop Evolution

J. Doebley, A. Stec, A. Bacigalupo, 1994 .

Genome Editing in Soybean with CRISPR/Cas9.

Samatha Gunapati, R. Stupar, J. Michno, 2019, Methods in molecular biology.

Evolution of anthocyanin biosynthesis in maize kernels: the role of regulatory and enzymatic loci.

B. Gaut, J. Doebley, S. Fuerstenberg, 1996, Genetics.

Dissecting the maize genome by using chromosome addition and radiation hybrid lines.

A. Stec, R. Phillips, H. Rines, 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations.

J. Doebley, A. Stec, 1993, Genetics.

An Induced Chromosomal Translocation in Soybean Disrupts a KASI Ortholog and Is Associated with a High-Sucrose and Low-Oil Seed Phenotype

R. Stupar, G. Muehlbauer, J. Michno, 2017, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

Maize chromosome additions and radiation hybrids in oat and their use in dissecting the maize genome

A. Stec, R. Phillips, H. Rines, 2005 .

Genomic variation and DNA repair associated with soybean transgenesis: a comparison to cultivars and mutagenized plants

Justin E. Anderson, R. Stupar, Shaun J. Curtin, 2016, BMC Biotechnology.

Integration, abundance, and transmission of mutations and transgenes in a series of CRISPR/Cas9 soybean lines

R. Stupar, J. Michno, Xiaobo Wang, 2020, BMC Biotechnology.

Whole‐genome re‐sequencing reveals the impact of the interaction of copy number variants of the rhg1 and Rhg4 genes on broad‐based resistance to soybean cyst nematode

H. Nguyen, R. Stupar, G. Patil, 2019, Plant biotechnology journal.

Genetic and morphological analysis of a maize-teosinte F2 population: implications for the origin of maize.

J. Doebley, A. Stec, M. Edwards, 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

The limitsof selection duringmaizedomestication

J. Doebley, J. Hey, A. Stec, 1999 .

Development of mPing‐based activation tags for crop insertional mutagenesis

R. Stupar, T. Clemente, C. N. Hancock, 2020, bioRxiv.

A Roadmap for Functional Structural Variants in the Soybean Genome

Justin E. Anderson, S. Cannon, P. Cregan, 2014, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

Genome Resilience and Prevalence of Segmental Duplications Following Fast Neutron Irradiation of Soybean

Justin E. Anderson, D. Grant, R. Stupar, 2014, Genetics.

R. Stupar, G. Muehlbauer, A. Stec, 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science.

CRISPR/Cas9 and TALENs generate heritable mutations for genes involved in small RNA processing of Glycine max and Medicago truncatula

D. Voytas, R. Stupar, A. Eamens, 2017, Plant biotechnology journal.

Screening populations for copy number variation using genotyping-by-sequencing: a proof of concept using soybean fast neutron mutants

R. Stupar, B. Boyle, F. Belzile, 2019, BMC Genomics.

Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte.

J. Doebley, A. Stec, 1991, Genetics.

Soybean RIN4 represents a mechanistic link between plant immune and symbiotic signaling

G. Stacey, R. Stupar, J. Michno, 2023, bioRxiv.

Characterization of genetic heterogeneity within accessions in the USDA soybean germplasm collection

R. Stupar, A. Stec, S. Mulkey, 2020, The plant genome.