K. O. Rengerink

Cost analysis PROBAAT-II; induction of labour with oral misoprostol or Foley catheter at term

G. Kleiverda, M. Józwiak, I. Evers, 2016 .

Participant eligibility , recruitment and retention in pragmatic trials 1 2

S. Kalkman, L. Eckert, R. Groenwold, 2017 .

SYNTAX score II

P. Bossuyt, B. Mol, P. Tajik, 2013, The Lancet.

Predictors for Emergency Cesarean Delivery in Women with Placenta Previa

B. Mol, M. V. van Pampus, E. Pajkrt, 2016, American Journal of Perinatology.

Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study protocol, a multicentre randomised controlled trial

P. Pernet, M. Oudijk, M. Porath, 2016 .

Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial

B. Mol, P. Pernet, M. Oudijk, 2013, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

Erratum to: Potential Improvement of Pregnancy Outcome through Prenatal Small for Gestational Age Detection

B. Mol, C. Verhoeven, A. Ravelli, 2014, American Journal of Perinatology.

Burden of respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis on the Dutch pediatric intensive care units

L. Bont, M. Kneyber, J. V. van Woensel, 2021, European Journal of Pediatrics.

Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial

J. Post, R. Rijnders, H. Scheepers, 2011, The Lancet.

Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for induction of labor: individual participant data meta‐analysis

H. Kruit, B. Mol, Z. Alfirevic, 2020, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.