Rolph Houben

发表

Analysis of individual preferences for tuning of noise-reduction algorithms

Wouter A. Dreschler, Rolph Houben, Tjeerd M. H. Dijkstra, 2012 .

HearCom-report D-6-1: Report on the analysis and evaluation of current fitting procedures used throughout Europe

Volker Hohmann, Andrew Faulkner, Markus Meis, 2005 .

Differences in Preference for Noise Reduction Strength between Individual Listeners

Wouter A. Dreschler, Rolph Houben, Tjeerd M. H. Dijkstra, 2011 .

Investigation into the applicability and optimization of the Dutch matrix sentence test for use with cochlear implant users

Wouter A Dreschler, Rolph Houben, Femke L Theelen-van den Hoek, 2014, International journal of audiology.

French and Dutch speech intelligibility tests: A comparative approach

Jan Wouters, Heleen Luts, Sofie Jansen, 2013 .

Evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing instruments

Marc Moonen, Giso Grimm, Volker Hohmann, 2008, 2008 16th European Signal Processing Conference.

The influence of noise type on the preferred setting of a noise reduction algorithm

Tjeerd M. H. Dijkstra, W. A. Dreschler, Rolph Houben, 2011 .

Using response time to speech as a measure for listening effort

Rolph Houben, Wouter A. Dreschler, Maaike van Doorn-Bierman, 2013, International journal of audiology.

Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.

Wouter A Dreschler, Rolph Houben, Inge Brons, 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Development of a Dutch matrix sentence test to assess speech intelligibility in noise

Astrid van Wieringen, Heleen Luts, Wouter A Dreschler, 2014, International journal of audiology.

Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids.

Giso Grimm, Volker Hohmann, Arne Leijon, 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Optimization of the Dutch Matrix Test by Random Selection of Sentences From a Preselected Subset

Wouter A. Dreschler, Rolph Houben, 2015, Trends in hearing.

Perceptual comparison of noise reduction in hearing aids

W. A. Dreschler, Rolph Houben, Inge Brons, 2011 .

Perceptual evaluation of standard and new signal enhancement strategies

Marc Moonen, Giso Grimm, Volker Hohmann, 2009 .

HearCom-report D-6-4: Report on outcomes of research on automated fitting for compression hearing aids

W. A. Dreschler, Rolph Houben, 2007 .

Can We Compare the Sound Quality of Noise Reduction between Hearing Aids? A Method to Level the Ground Between Devices

Wouter A. Dreschler, Rolph Houben, Inge Brons, 2011 .

Measuring Auditory Fitness in Locomotive Engineers: Development and Validation of a Signal Detection Test

Wouter A. Dreschler, Rolph Houben, Hanneke E.M. van der Hoek-Snieders, 2021, Ear and hearing.

Effects of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Perceived Listening Effort, and Personal Preference in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Wouter A. Dreschler, Rolph Houben, Inge Brons, 2014, Trends in hearing.

Signal processing in Hearing Aids: Results of the HEARCOM project

Marc Moonen, Giso Grimm, Volker Hohmann, 2008 .

Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Wouter A. Dreschler, Rolph Houben, Inge Brons, 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Perceptual Effects of Noise Reduction With Respect to Personal Preference, Speech Intelligibility, and Listening Effort

Wouter A Dreschler, Rolph Houben, Inge Brons, 2013, Ear and hearing.

Acoustical and Perceptual Comparison of Noise Reduction and Compression in Hearing Aids.

Wouter A Dreschler, Rolph Houben, Inge Brons, 2015, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.