Matthew J Page

发表

Few studies exist examining methods for selecting studies, abstracting data, and appraising quality in a systematic review.

Andrea C Tricco, Reid C Robson, Ba' Pham, 2019, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

Dealing with effect size multiplicity in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses

Julian P T Higgins, Matthew J Page, José A López-López, 2018, Research synthesis methods.

RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Natalie S Blencowe, Christopher J Cates, Isabelle Boutron, 2019, BMJ.

Fender Modernization at Pier 1, Port of Davisville, RI

Matthew J Page, Dino D Fiscaletti, 2013 .

Improving the conduct of systematic reviews: a process mining perspective.

Ebrahim Bagheri, Andrea C Tricco, Asef Pourmasoumi, 2018, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

Rates and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Steve McDonald, Fiona Fidler, Hannah Fraser, 2021, F1000Research.

Therapeutic ultrasound for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Nicola Massy-Westropp, Denise O'Connor, Matthew J Page, 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

Mass Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: An Exercise in Mega-silliness?

David Moher, Matthew J Page, D. Moher, 2016, The Milbank quarterly.

Evaluation of a Theory-Informed Implementation Intervention for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in General Medical Practice: The IMPLEMENT Cluster Randomised Trial

Rachelle Buchbinder, Susan Michie, Peter Kent, 2013, PloS one.

Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis.

Lisa Hartling, David Moher, Wasifa Zarin, 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study

David Moher, Lun Li, Douglas G Altman, 2016, PLoS medicine.

Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis.

David Moher, Douglas G Altman, Andrea C Tricco, 2018, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

A third of systematic reviews changed or did not specify the primary outcome: a PROSPERO register study.

David Moher, Andrea C Tricco, Sharon E Straus, 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.

Andrew Forbes, Matthew J Page, Kerry Dwan, 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.