M. Braeuning

Current status of full-field digital mammography.

Andrew D. A. Maidment, M J Yaffe, R E Hendrick, 2000, Academic radiology.

Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms

Bradley M. Hemminger, Stephen M. Pizer, Etta D. Pisano, 1998, Journal of Digital Imaging.

Interpretation time of serial chest CT examinations with stacked-metaphor workstation versus film alternator.

J R Perry, W D Bidgood, K E Muller, 1995, Radiology.

Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type.

Andrew D. A. Maidment, Keith E Muller, Andrew D A Maidment, 2003, Radiology.

Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display.

Mary Scott Soo, Keith E Muller, J A Baker, 2002, Radiology.

Informing patients of diagnostic mammography results: mammographer's opinions.

M. Schell, J. Earp, M. O’Malley, 2000, Academic radiology.

Has the mammography quality standards act affected the mammography quality in North Carolina?

E. Pisano, M. Schell, Y. Lin, 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.