Controlling development and chemotaxis of soft-bodied multicellular animats with the same gene regulatory network

The ability to actively forage for resources is one of the defining properties of animals, and can be seen as a form of minimal cognition. In this paper we model soft-bodied robots, or “animats”, which are able to swim in a simulated twodimensional fluid environment toward food particles emitting a diffusive chemical signal. Both the multicellular development and behaviour of the animats are controlled by a gene regulatory network (GRN), which is encoded in a linear genome. Coupled with the simulated physics, the activity of the GRN affects cell divisions and cell movements during development, as well as the expansion and contraction of filaments connecting the cells in the swimming adult body. The global motion that emerges from the dynamics of the animat relies on the spring-like filaments and drag forces created by the fluid. Our study shows that it is possible to evolve the animat’s genome (through mutations, duplications and deletions) to achieve directional motion in this environment. It also suggests that a “minimally cognitive” behaviour of this kind can emerge without a central control or nervous system.

[1]  Ernesto Costa,et al.  The Regulatory Network Computational Device , 2012, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines.

[2]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  A Developmental Model for the Evolution of Complete Autonomous Agents , 1996 .

[3]  Peter Eggenberger-Hotz Evolving Morphologies of Simulated 3d Organisms Based on Differential Gene Expression , 2007 .

[4]  R. Beer,et al.  20 – A developmental model for the evolution of complete autonomous agents , 2003 .

[5]  Marco Colombetti,et al.  Robot Shaping: Developing Autonomous Agents Through Learning , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Yan Meng,et al.  Autonomous Self-Reconfiguration of Modular Robots by Evolving a Hierarchical Mechanochemical Model , 2011, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[7]  Bernhard Sendhoff,et al.  An animat's cell doctrine , 2011, ECAL.

[8]  René Doursat,et al.  Organically Grown Architectures: Creating Decentralized, Autonomous Systems by Embryomorphic Engineering , 2008, Organic Computing.

[9]  Wolfgang Banzhaf On the Dynamics of an Artificial Regulatory Network , 2003, ECAL.

[10]  Borys Wróbel,et al.  Evolving Spiking Neural Networks in the GReaNs ( Gene Regulatory evolving artificial Networks ) Plaftorm , 2012 .

[11]  R. Sokal,et al.  A New Statistical Approach to Geographic Variation Analysis , 1969 .

[12]  Randy Wayne,et al.  The Social Amoebae: The Biology of Cellular Slime Molds , 2010 .

[13]  Akio Ishiguro,et al.  Fully decentralized control of a soft-bodied robot inspired by true slime mold , 2010, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  Marc Schoenauer,et al.  Evolving Genes to Balance a Pole , 2010, EuroGP.

[15]  Borys Wróbel,et al.  Processing Signals with Evolving Artificial Gene Regulatory Networks , 2010, ALIFE.

[16]  Nawwaf N. Kharma,et al.  Bluenome: A Novel Developmental Model of Artificial Morphogenesis , 2004, GECCO.

[17]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Evolving Complete Agents using Artificial Ontogeny , 2003 .

[18]  Dimitris P. Tsakiris,et al.  Simuun: A simulation Environment for Undulatory Locomotion , 2006 .

[19]  Borys Wróbel,et al.  Brainless Bodies: Controlling the Development and Behavior of Multicellular Animats by Gene Regulation and Diffusive Signals , 2012, ALIFE.

[20]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Creating High-Level Components with a Generative Representation for Body-Brain Evolution , 2002, Artificial Life.

[21]  Fred Keijzer,et al.  Principles of Minimal Cognition: Casting Cognition as Sensorimotor Coordination , 2006, Adapt. Behav..

[22]  Carlos Sánchez,et al.  Embryomorphic Engineering: Emergent Innovation Through Evolutionary Development , 2012, Morphogenetic Engineering, Toward Programmable Complex Systems.

[23]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[24]  René Doursat,et al.  Facilitating evolutionary innovation by developmental modularity and variability , 2009, GECCO.

[25]  Borys Wróbel,et al.  Co-evolution of morphology and control of soft-bodied multicellular animats , 2012, GECCO '12.

[26]  Masahiro Shimizu,et al.  A modular robot that exploits a spontaneous connectivity control mechanism , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[27]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Automatic Design and Manufacture of Soft Robots , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[28]  John Rieffel,et al.  Growing and Evolving Soft Robots , 2014, Artificial Life.

[29]  Peter Eggenberger,et al.  Evolving Morphologies of Simulated 3d Organisms Based on Differential Gene Expression , 1997 .