Nonstationary stochastic analysis in well capture zone design using first‐order Taylor's series approximation

[1] Nonstationarity of flow fields due to pumping wells and its impact on advective transport is of particular interest in well capture zone design and wellhead protection. However, techniques based on Monte Carlo methods to characterize the associated capture zone uncertainty are time consuming and cumbersome. This paper introduces an alternative approach. The mean and covariance of system state variables (i.e., head, pore water velocity, and particle trajectory) are approximated using a first-order Taylor's series with sensitivity coefficients estimated from the adjoint operator for a system of discrete equations. The approach allows nonstationarity due to several sources (e.g., transmissivity, pumping, boundary conditions) to be treated. By employing numerical solution methods, it is able to handle irregular geometry, varying boundary conditions, complicated sink/source terms, and different covariance functions, all of which are important factors for real-world applications. A comparison of results for the Taylor's series approximation with those from Monte Carlo analysis showed, in general, good agreement for most of the tested particles. Particle trajectory variance calculated using Taylor's series approximation is then used to predict well capture zone probabilities under the assumption of normality of the mass transport's state variables. Verification of this assumption showed that not all particle trajectories (depending on their starting location) are normally or log-normally distributed. However, the risk of using the first-order method to delineate the confidence interval of a well capture zone is minimal since it marginally overestimates the 2.5% probability contour. Furthermore, this should be balanced against its greater computation efficiency over the Monte Carlo approach.

[1]  G. Dagan,et al.  Stochastic analysis of boundaries effects on head spatial variability in heterogeneous aquifers: 1. Constant head boundary , 1988 .

[2]  Oregon State Water Resources Research Institute , 1986 .

[3]  Matthijs van Leeuwen,et al.  Stochastic determination of well capture zones conditioned on regular grids of transmissivity measurements , 2000 .

[4]  G. Dagan Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  You‐Kuan Zhang Stochastic Methods for Flow in Porous Media: Coping with Uncertainties , 2001 .

[6]  W. G. Gray,et al.  Finite Element Simulation in Surface and Subsurface Hydrology , 1977 .

[7]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow part: 1. Mathematical development , 1981 .

[8]  W. Kinzelbach,et al.  Computation of stochastic wellhead protection zones by combining the first-order second-moment method and Kolmogorov backward equation analysis , 2000 .

[9]  Harald Osnes,et al.  Stochastic analysis of head spatial variability in bounded rectangular heterogeneous aquifers , 1995 .

[10]  Keith Beven,et al.  Bayesian methodology for stochastic capture zone delineation incorporating transmissivity measurements and hydraulic head observations , 2003 .

[11]  J. M. Shafer,et al.  Assessment of Uncertainty in Time‐Related Capture Zones Using Conditional Simulation of Hydraulic Conductivity , 1991 .

[12]  Dennis McLaughlin,et al.  Using the Nonstationary Spectral Method to Analyze Flow Through Heterogeneous Trending Media , 1995 .

[13]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Radial Flow in a Bounded Randomly Heterogeneous Aquifer , 2001 .

[14]  C. L. Winter,et al.  Nonstationary stochastic analysis of steady state flow through variably saturated, heterogeneous media , 1998 .

[15]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  Stochastic analysis of flow in a heterogeneous unsaturated‐saturated system , 2002 .

[16]  Dennis McLaughlin,et al.  Stochastic analysis of nonstationary subsurface solute transport: 1. Unconditional moments , 1989 .

[17]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  Stochastic analysis of nonstationary subsurface solute transport: 2. Conditional moments , 1989 .

[18]  Uncertainty estimation of well catchments in heterogeneous aquifers , 2002 .

[19]  C. Zheng,et al.  Applied contaminant transport modeling , 2002 .

[20]  R. W. Andrews,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Steady State Groundwater Flow Using Adjoint Operators , 1985 .

[21]  G. Marsily Quantitative Hydrogeology: Groundwater Hydrology for Engineers , 1986 .

[22]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Bayesian methodology to stochastic capture zone determination: Conditioning on transmissivity measurements , 2002 .

[23]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The finite element method, fourth edition; volume 2: solid and fluid mechanics, dynamics and non-linearity , 1991 .

[24]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Head and Velocity Covariances Under Quasi‐Steady State flow and their Effects on Advective Transport , 1996 .

[25]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  A Reassessment of the Groundwater Inverse Problem , 1996 .

[26]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  Nonlocal and localized analyses of conditional mean steady state flow in bounded, randomly nonuniform domains: 1. Theory and computational approach , 1999 .

[27]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  An Application of the Geostatistical Approach to the Inverse Problem in Two-Dimensional Groundwater Modeling , 1984 .

[28]  R. Freeze A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of one‐dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media , 1975 .

[29]  M. Shvidler Correlation model of transport in Random fields , 1993 .

[30]  J. Bear Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[31]  Keith Beven,et al.  A Bayesian approach to stochastic capture zone delineation incorporating tracer arrival times, conductivity measurements, and hydraulic head observations , 2003 .

[32]  Yoram Rubin,et al.  Flow in Heterogeneous Media Displaying a Linear Trend in the Log Conductivity , 1995 .

[33]  Gour-Tsyh Yeh,et al.  On the computation of Darcian velocity and mass balance in the finite element modeling of groundwater flow , 1981 .

[34]  Dennis McLaughlin,et al.  Correction to “Stochastic analysis of nonstationary subsurface solute transport: 1. Unconditional moments” by Wendy Graham and Dennis McLaughlin , 1989 .

[35]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic analysis of spatial variability in subsurface flows: 1. Comparison of one‐ and three‐dimensional flows , 1978 .

[36]  C. L. Winter,et al.  A Perturbation Expansion for Diffusion in a Random Velocity Field , 1984 .

[37]  R. L. Naff,et al.  STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL FLOW IN A BOUNDED DOMAIN. , 1986 .

[38]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  On stochastic study of well capture zones in bounded, randomly heterogeneous media , 2003 .

[39]  Adrian P. Butler,et al.  Worth of head data in well-capture zone design: deterministic and stochastic analysis , 2004 .

[40]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  Time‐Related Capture Zones for Contaminants in Randomly Heterogeneous Formations , 1999 .

[41]  Y. Rubin,et al.  Investigation of flow and transport in certain cases of nonstationary conductivity fields , 1994 .

[42]  Yoram Rubin,et al.  Stochastic analysis of boundaries effects on head spatial variability in heterogeneous aquifers: 2. Impervious boundary , 1989 .

[43]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  Probabilistic estimation of well catchments in heterogeneous aquifers , 1996 .

[44]  M. A. Mariño,et al.  Stochastic groundwater flow analysis in the presence of trends in heterogeneous hydraulic conductivity fields , 1993 .

[45]  Y. Rubin Stochastic modeling of macrodispersion in heterogeneous porous media , 1990 .

[46]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[47]  Stochastic delineation of well capture zones , 2004 .

[48]  Matthijs van Leeuwen,et al.  Stochastic determination of well capture zones , 1998 .

[49]  Dongxiao Zhang Numerical solutions to statistical moment equations of groundwater flow in nonstationary, bounded, heterogeneous media , 1998 .

[50]  Harald Osnes,et al.  Stochastic analysis of velocity spatial variability in bounded rectangular heterogeneous aquifers , 1998 .

[51]  C. Axness,et al.  Three‐dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers , 1983 .

[52]  M. Bakr,et al.  Stochastic groundwater quality management: Role of spatial variability and conditioning , 2003 .

[53]  Keith Beven,et al.  Stochastic capture zone delineation within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation methodology: Conditioning on head observations , 2001 .

[54]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  Convergence assessment of numerical Monte Carlo simulations in groundwater hydrology , 2004 .