Human-robot interaction in USAR technical search: two heads are better than one

Effective human-robot interaction in urban search and rescue robotics currently requires a minimum 2:1 human-to-robot ratio. The demands are not just physical (though the task at present is facilitated by having a second person assist with physical robot operations); cognitive challenges are presented by the key-hole effect, teleproprioception and telekinesthesis. In studies with 2:1 robot teams, operators who talked more with their teammates about the search environment, the robot's situatedness in that environment, and search strategies seemed to develop a shared mental model of both the search environment and the task at hand. Moreover, operators who talked more about goal-directed aspects of the search task with their teammates were rated as having better situation awareness and task performance. Effective teams were nine times more likely to find victims in search exercises. This suggests that robot-assisted search and rescue is a team task and good human-robot interaction is critical to performance.

[1]  O. Brock,et al.  Robots in Human Environments: Basic Autonomous Capabilities , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[3]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[4]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[5]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Introduction to AI Robotics , 2000 .

[6]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement , 1988 .

[7]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[8]  Vladimir J. Lumelsky,et al.  Final report for the DARPA/NSF interdisciplinary study on human-robot interaction , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[9]  David D. Woods,et al.  Envisioning human-robot coordination in future operations , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[10]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Workflow study on human-robot interaction in USAR , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[11]  Fredrik Rehnmark,et al.  Robonaut: NASA's Space Humanoid , 2000, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[12]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Planning, Shared Mental Models, and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link Is Established , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Design and evaluation , 1995 .