Acoustic response from adherent targeted contrast agents.

In ultrasonic molecular imaging, encapsulated micron-sized gas bubbles are tethered to a blood vessel wall by targeting ligands. A challenging problem is to detect the echoes from adherent microbubbles and distinguish them from echoes from nonadherent agents and tissue. Echoes from adherent contrast agents are observed to include a high amplitude at the fundamental frequency, and significantly different spectral shape compared with free agents (p <0.0003). Mechanisms for the observed acoustical difference and potential techniques to utilize these differences for molecular imaging are proposed.

[1]  Yuantai Hu,et al.  Asymmetric oscillation of cavitation bubbles in a microvessel and its implications upon mechanisms of clinical vessel injury in shock-wave lithotripsy , 2005 .

[2]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Asymmetric oscillation of adherent targeted ultrasound contrast agents. , 2005, Applied physics letters.

[3]  J. Hossack,et al.  Acoustic radiation force enhances targeted delivery of ultrasound contrast microbubbles: in vitro verification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  K. Nightingale,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Molecular and Cellular Imaging with Targeted Contrast Ultrasound , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  P. Dayton,et al.  Effect of coupled oscillations on microbubble behavior. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  P. Dayton,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Kester Nahen,et al.  Dynamics of laser-induced cavitation bubbles near an elastic boundary , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  E. Unger,et al.  Targeted-Microbubble Binding Selectively to GPIIb IIIa Receptors of Platelet Thrombi , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[10]  Susannah H Bloch,et al.  Radiation-Force Assisted Targeting Facilitates Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging , 2004, Molecular imaging.

[11]  P. Dayton,et al.  Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  Yukio Tomita,et al.  Growth and collapse of cavitation bubbles near a curved rigid boundary , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  E. Kimmel,et al.  Gas bubble pulsation in a semiconfined space subjected to ultrasound. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Charles C. Church,et al.  The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles , 1995 .

[15]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Angiogenesis by Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to &agr;v-Integrins , 2003, Circulation.

[16]  J. G. Miller,et al.  In vitro characterization of a novel, tissue-targeted ultrasonic contrast system with acoustic microscopy. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Yukio Tomita,et al.  Numerical analysis of a gas bubble near a rigid boundary in an oscillatory pressure field , 1994 .