Part 9: Acute Coronary Syndromes: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Introduction Clinicians often struggle with uncertainty and complexity in deciding which course of treatment will likely lead to an optimal outcome for an individual patient. Scientific research provides information on how patient populations have responded to treatment regimens, and this information, combined with a knowledge of the individual patient, can help guide the clinician’s decisions. The recommendations in this 2015 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) are based on an extensive evidence review process that was begun by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) after the publication of the ILCOR 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations and was completed in February 2015. In this in-depth evidence review process, ILCOR examined topics and then generated a prioritized list of questions for systematic review. Questions were first formulated in PICO (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) format, and then a search for relevant articles was performed. The evidence was evaluated by the ILCOR task forces by using the standardized methodologic approach proposed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. The quality of the evidence was categorized based on the study methodologies and the 5 core GRADE domains of risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and other considerations (including publication bias). Then, where possible, consensus-based treatment recommendations were created. To create this 2015 AHA Guidelines Update for CPR and ECC, the AHA formed 15 writing groups, with careful attention to avoid conflicts of interest, to assess the ILCOR treatment recommendations, and to write AHA treatment recommendations by using the AHA Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence (LOE) system. The recommendations made in the 2015 Guidelines Update for CPR and ECC are informed by the ILCOR recommendations and GRADE classification, in the context of the delivery of medical care in North America. In the online version of this publication, live links are provided so the reader can connect directly to the systematic reviews on the Scientific Evidence Evaluation and Review System (SEERS) website. These links are indicated by a superscript combination of letters and numbers (eg, ACS 873). This 2015 Guidelines Update offers recommendations for the care of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The recommendations made here update those made in the 2010 Guidelines and address only those issues that were reviewed in 2015. The ILCOR ACS Task Force did not review areas in which it found a paucity of new evidence between 2010 and 2015; therefore, the 2010 Guidelines for these unreviewed areas remain current. For example, acetylsalicylic acid administration has been shown to be of benefit in ACS and was recommended by the 2010 Guidelines. Acetylsalicylic acid was not reviewed by the ACS Task Force in 2015, so the recommendations from 2010 should be used. (Note: The First Aid section of this 2015 Guidelines Update makes recommendations on acetylsalicylic acid administration by nonmedical personnel—see “Part 15: First Aid”). The recommendations that were not reviewed in 2015 will either be reviewed and included in future AHA Guidelines for CPR and ECC or will be in the most recent ACC/AHA Guidelines. A table of recommendations made in this update, as well as the recommendations made in “Part 10: Acute Coronary Syndromes” of the 2010 Guidelines, can be found in the Appendix. The 2015 Guidelines for ACS are directed toward practitioners who provide care for patients with suspected ACS from the time of first medical contact until disposition from the emergency department (ED). Care providers during this time may include emergency medical service (EMS) dispatchers, first responders, EMT-Bs, paramedics, nurses, physicians, and other independent practitioners.

[1]  E. Amsterdam A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2015 .

[2]  Peter Cameron,et al.  Air Versus Oxygen in ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2015, Circulation.

[3]  B. Gersh,et al.  Bivalirudin versus heparin with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: pooled patient-level analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI and EUROMAX trials. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  A. Kirtane,et al.  Anticoagulant therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of stents and P2Y12 inhibitors , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  A. Kelly,et al.  Prospective external validation of an accelerated (2-h) acute coronary syndrome rule-out process using a contemporary troponin assay , 2014, International Journal of Emergency Medicine.

[6]  Chien‐Hua Huang,et al.  The effect of hyperoxia on survival following adult cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. , 2014, Resuscitation.

[7]  M. Sabatine,et al.  Bivalirudin versus heparin in patients planned for percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 2014, The Lancet.

[8]  D. O'Reilly,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits of out-of-hospital 12-lead ECG and advance notification in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. , 2014, Annals of Emergency Medicine.

[9]  J. Boivin,et al.  Computerized interpretation of the prehospital electrocardiogram: predictive value for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and impact on on-scene time. , 2014, CJEM.

[10]  Eugenia Yu,et al.  Development and validation of a prediction rule for early discharge of low-risk emergency department patients with potential ischemic chest pain. , 2014, CJEM.

[11]  J. Greenslade,et al.  Validation of an accelerated high‐sensitivity troponin T assay protocol in an Australian cohort with chest pain , 2014, The Medical journal of Australia.

[12]  J. Greenslade,et al.  The new Vancouver Chest Pain Rule using troponin as the only biomarker: an external validation study. , 2014, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[13]  J. Tamayo-Sarver,et al.  Effect of Prehospital Cardiac Catheterization Lab Activation on Door-to-Balloon Time, Mortality, and False-Positive Activation , 2014, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[14]  S. McLeod,et al.  A Prospective Evaluation of the Utility of the Prehospital 12-lead Electrocardiogram to Change Patient Management in the Emergency Department , 2014, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[15]  S. Pocock,et al.  Bivalirudin started during emergency transport for primary PCI. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  I. Porto,et al.  Comparison of pre-hospital 600 mg or 900 mg vs. peri-interventional 300 mg clopidogrel in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty. The Load&Go randomized trial. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[17]  C. Reid,et al.  Validation of high-sensitivity troponin I in a 2-hour diagnostic strategy to assess 30-day outcomes in emergency department patients with possible acute coronary syndrome. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  A. Singer,et al.  Identifying patients for early discharge: performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[19]  Kurt S. Hoffmayer,et al.  Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes of cardiac arrest survivors having versus not having coronary angiography. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Fibrinolysis or primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  L. Morrison,et al.  Clinical outcomes and cost implications of routine early PCI after fibrinolysis: one-year follow-up of the Trial of Routine Angioplasty and Stenting after Fibrinolysis to Enhance Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TRANSFER-AMI) study. , 2013, American heart journal.

[22]  S. Wilber,et al.  Prehospital Electrocardiographic Computer Identification of ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2013, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[23]  G. Trillò,et al.  Impact of emergency coronary angiography on in-hospital outcome of unconscious survivors after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. , 2012, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  T. Rice,et al.  Hyperoxia is associated with increased mortality in patients treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia after sudden cardiac arrest* , 2012, Critical care medicine.

[25]  L. Køber,et al.  Emergency coronary angiography in comatose cardiac arrest patients: do real-life experiences support the guidelines? , 2012, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[26]  C. Schmidt,et al.  To transmit or not to transmit: how good are emergency medical personnel in detecting STEMI in patients with chest pain? , 2012, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[27]  V. Nanjayya,et al.  Immediate coronary angiogram in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest--an Australian study. , 2012, Resuscitation.

[28]  K. Huber,et al.  Efficacy and safety of a high loading dose of clopidogrel administered prehospitally to improve primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: the randomized CIPAMI trial , 2012, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[29]  M. Copass,et al.  Comparison of role of early (less than six hours) to later (more than six hours) or no cardiac catheterization after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. , 2012, The American journal of cardiology.

[30]  Robert J Brison,et al.  Development of a clinical prediction rule for 30-day cardiac events in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. , 2012, Annals of emergency medicine.

[31]  R. Argyle,et al.  High-concentration versus titrated oxygen therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a pilot randomized controlled trial. , 2012, American heart journal.

[32]  V. Mahajan,et al.  How to Interpret Elevated Cardiac Troponin Levels , 2011, Circulation.

[33]  K. Sunde,et al.  Strong and weak aspects of an established post-resuscitation treatment protocol-A five-year observational study. , 2011, Resuscitation.

[34]  E. Vicaut,et al.  Intravenous enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the international randomised open-label ATOLL trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[35]  A. Richards,et al.  Early dynamic change in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in the investigation of acute myocardial infarction. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.

[36]  Barbara T. Unger,et al.  Therapeutic Hypothermia After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Evaluation of a Regional System to Increase Access to Cooling , 2011, Circulation.

[37]  Rolf Lefering,et al.  ROSC after cardiac arrest--the RACA score to predict outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. , 2011, European heart journal.

[38]  G. Schuler,et al.  Randomized comparison of pre-hospital-initiated facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction very early after symptom onset: the LIPSIA-STEMI trial (Leipzig immediate prehospital facilitated angioplasty in ST-segment , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[39]  C. Lory,et al.  Impact of routine percutaneous coronary intervention after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation , 2011, Critical care.

[40]  X. Combes,et al.  Predictive factors for positive coronary angiography in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients , 2011, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[41]  P. Armstrong,et al.  The influence of time from symptom onset and reperfusion strategy on 1-year survival in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of an early fibrinolytic strategy versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention from CAPTIM and WEST. , 2011, American heart journal.

[42]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  Automated electrocardiogram interpretation programs versus cardiologists' triage decision making based on teletransmitted data in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[43]  D. Ardissino,et al.  Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Intended for Reperfusion With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) Trial Subgroup Analysis , 2010, Circulation.

[44]  R. O’Connor,et al.  Part 10: acute coronary syndromes: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2010, Circulation.

[45]  J. Nolan,et al.  Part 9: Acute coronary syndromes: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. , 2010, Resuscitation.

[46]  Takumi Kimura,et al.  Comparison of long-term prognostic evaluation between pre-intervention thrombolysis and primary coronary intervention: a prospective randomized trial: five-year results of the IMPORTANT study. , 2010, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[47]  Carin M. Van Gelder,et al.  Early Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activation by Paramedics for Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction on Prehospital 12-Lead Electrocardiograms , 2010, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[48]  S. Iliceto,et al.  Acceptable reperfusion delay to prefer primary angioplasty over fibrin-specific thrombolytic therapy is affected (mainly) by the patient's mortality risk: 1 h does not fit all. , 2010, European heart journal.

[49]  S. Halvorsen,et al.  Efficacy and safety of immediate angioplasty versus ischemia-guided management after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction in areas with very long transfer distances results of the NORDISTEMI (NORwegian study on DIstrict treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction). , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[50]  L. Morrison,et al.  Routine early angioplasty after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  P. Widimsky Primary angioplasty vs. thrombolysis: the end of the controversy? , 2009, European heart journal.

[52]  K. Sunde,et al.  Outcome, timing and adverse events in therapeutic hypothermia after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest , 2009, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[53]  P. Touboul,et al.  Comparison of primary angioplasty and pre-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction (CAPTIM) trial: a 5-year follow-up. , 2009, European heart journal.

[54]  T. Engstrøm,et al.  Feasibility and safety of prehospital administration of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[55]  H. Genzwürker,et al.  Reperfusion rate and inhospital mortality of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction diagnosed already in the prehospital phase: results of the German Prehospital Myocardial Infarction Registry (PREMIR). , 2009, Resuscitation.

[56]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[57]  D. Cone,et al.  Can Paramedics Read ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction on Prehospital 12-Lead Electrocardiograms? , 2009, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[58]  C. Callaway,et al.  Abstract P88: Early Coronary Angiography Predicts Improved Outcome Following Cardiac Arrest: Propensity-Adjusted Analysis , 2008 .

[59]  Denise O'Connor,et al.  Chapter 5: Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies , 2008 .

[60]  R. Niska,et al.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary. , 2008, National health statistics reports.

[61]  A. Shah,et al.  A comparison of door-to-balloon times and false-positive activations between emergency department and out-of-hospital activation of the coronary catheterization team. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[62]  J. Ferrières,et al.  Comparison of Thrombolysis Followed by Broad Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment–Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: Data From the French Registry on Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) , 2008, Circulation.

[63]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Direct ambulance admission to the cardiac catheterization laboratory significantly reduces door-to-balloon times in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2008, American heart journal.

[64]  Ori Ben-Yehuda,et al.  Effect of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram on activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory and door-to-balloon time in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[65]  W. Kochman,et al.  Transfer with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban for primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. on-site thrombolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): a randomized open-label study for patients admitted to community hospitals. , 2007, European heart journal.

[66]  David G Strauss,et al.  Paramedic transtelephonic communication to cardiologist of clinical and electrocardiographic assessment for rapid reperfusion of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2007, Journal of electrocardiology.

[67]  F. Fernández‐Avilés,et al.  Primary angioplasty vs. early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: the GRACIA-2 non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial. , 2007, European heart journal.

[68]  J. Herlitz,et al.  Treatment and outcome in post-resuscitation care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest when a modern therapeutic approach was introduced. , 2007, Resuscitation.

[69]  D. Davis,et al.  The Positive Predictive Value of Paramedic Versus Emergency Physician Interpretation of the Prehospital 12-Lead Electrocardiogram , 2007, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[70]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Feasibility and applicability of paramedic-based prehospital fibrinolysis in a large North American center. , 2006, American heart journal.

[71]  G. Schuler,et al.  ST-segment recovery and prognosis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction reperfused by prehospital combination fibrinolysis, prehospital initiated facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention, or primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[72]  I. Stiell,et al.  Diagnostic performance and potential clinical impact of advanced care paramedic interpretation of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the field. , 2006, CJEM.

[73]  F. Verheugt,et al.  Transport for abciximab facilitated primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis with a liberal rescue policy: the randomised Holland Infarction Study (HIS) , 2006, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[74]  P. Armstrong A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) study. , 2006, European heart journal.

[75]  J. Ottervanger,et al.  Feasibility and benefit of prehospital diagnosis, triage, and therapy by paramedics only in patients who are candidates for primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, American heart journal.

[76]  A. Kirtane,et al.  Comparison of very early treatment with either fibrinolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention facilitated with abciximab with respect to ST recovery and infarct-related artery epicardial flow in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Swedish Early Decision (SWEDES) r , 2006, American heart journal.

[77]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[78]  G. Wells,et al.  Combined angioplasty and pharmacological intervention versus thrombolysis alone in acute myocardial infarction (CAPITAL AMI study). , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[79]  Kathryn Brinsfield,et al.  Real-time paramedic compared with blinded physician identification of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of an observational study. , 2005, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[80]  P. Royle,et al.  Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of immediate angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[81]  F. Fernández‐Avilés,et al.  Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemia-guided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[82]  R. Tamura,et al.  Clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention with antecedent mutant t-PA administration for acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, American heart journal.

[83]  P. Touboul,et al.  Impact of Time to Treatment on Mortality After Prehospital Fibrinolysis or Primary Angioplasty: Data From the CAPTIM Randomized Clinical Trial , 2003, Circulation.

[84]  M. Aschermann,et al.  Interhospital transport for primary angioplasty improves the long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction compared with immediate thrombolysis in the nearest hospital (one-year follow-up of the PRAGUE-1 study). , 2003, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[85]  Klaus Rasmussen,et al.  A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[86]  C. Hofer,et al.  Beneficial effects of immediate stenting after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[87]  P. Serruys,et al.  Fibrinolytic therapy: is it a treatment of the past? , 2003, Circulation.

[88]  J. Boura,et al.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials , 2003, The Lancet.

[89]  P. Touboul,et al.  Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study , 2002, The Lancet.

[90]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with early (<2 h), intermediate (2-4 h) and late (>4 h) presentation treated by primary coronary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, European heart journal.

[91]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Influence of prehospital administration of aspirin and heparin on initial patency of the infarct-related artery in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[92]  William W O'Neill,et al.  A randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction: the Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction study. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[93]  F. Verheugt,et al.  Successful out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: what is the optimal in-hospital treatment strategy? , 2000, Resuscitation.

[94]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study. , 2000, European heart journal.

[95]  W. Dassen,et al.  Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities: a safety and feasibility study , 1999, Heart.

[96]  H. White,et al.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[97]  Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' Collaborative Group Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients , 1994, The Lancet.

[98]  P. Kudenchuk,et al.  Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial. , 1993, JAMA.

[99]  F. Sheehan,et al.  Prehospital thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[100]  A. Castaigne,et al.  Prehospital use of APSAC: results of a placebo-controlled study. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[101]  J. Rawles,et al.  Controlled trial of oxygen in uncomplicated myocardial infarction. , 1976, British medical journal.

[102]  R. O’Connor,et al.  Part 5: Acute coronary syndromes: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. , 2015, Resuscitation.

[103]  Robert A. Berg,et al.  International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and mergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment ecommendations , 2015 .

[104]  Barbara T. Unger,et al.  Early cardiac catheterization is associated with improved survival in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest without STEMI. , 2014, Resuscitation.

[105]  G. Montalescot,et al.  Prehospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[106]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Circulation.

[107]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2012, Circulation.

[108]  G. Wagner,et al.  Paramedics as decision makers on the activation of the catheterization laboratory in the presence of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2011, Journal of electrocardiology.

[109]  J. Parrillo,et al.  CARING FOR THE CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT Association Between Arterial Hyperoxia Following Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest and In-Hospital Mortality , 2010 .

[110]  B. Gersh Facilitated PCI in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2009 .

[111]  N. Kuchkina,et al.  [Effect of oxygenotherapy used in combination with reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction]. , 2005, Kardiologiia.

[112]  M. Aschermann,et al.  Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial--PRAGUE-2. , 2003, European heart journal.

[113]  K. Channer,et al.  Hypoxaemia and Supplemental Oxygen Therapy in the First 24 Hours after Myocardial Infarction: The Role of Pulse Oximetry , 1997, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.