Modeling and Evaluation of Maintenance Procedures for Gas Distribution Networks with Time-Dependent Parameters

Gas networks comprise a special class of infrastructure, with relevant implications on safety and availability of universal services. In this context, the ongoing deregulation of network operation gives relevance to modeling and evaluation techniques supporting predictability of dependability metrics. We propose a modeling approach that represents maintenance procedures as a multi-phased system, with parameters depending on physical and geographical characteristics of the network, working hours, and evolution of loads over the day. The overall model is cast into a non-Markovian variant of stochastic Petri nets, which allows concurrent execution of multiple generally distributed transitions but maintains a complexity independent of network size and topology. Solution is achieved through an interleaved execution of fluid-dynamic analysis of the network and analytic solution of the stochastic model of the procedure. Solution provides availability measures for individual sections of the network as well as global quality of service parameters.

[1]  J. Muñoz Estrada,et al.  Natural gas network modeling for power systems reliability studies , 2003 .

[2]  Goran Andersson,et al.  Reliability modeling of multi-carrier energy systems , 2009 .

[3]  Claudio R. Fuerte-Esquivel,et al.  Integrated energy flow analysis in natural gas and electricity coupled systems , 2011, 2011 North American Power Symposium.

[4]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Interdependency of Natural Gas Network and Power System Security , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  William H. Sanders,et al.  Möbius 2.3: An extensible tool for dependability, security, and performance evaluation of large and complex system models , 2009, 2009 IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems & Networks.

[6]  J. Munoz,et al.  Natural gas network modeling for power systems reliability studies , 2003, 2003 IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference Proceedings,.

[7]  C F Colebrook,et al.  TURBULENT FLOW IN PIPES, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE TRANSITION REGION BETWEEN THE SMOOTH AND ROUGH PIPE LAWS. , 1939 .

[8]  Miklós Telek,et al.  PhFit: A General Phase-Type Fitting Tool , 2002, Computer Performance Evaluation / TOOLS.

[9]  Philipp Reinecke,et al.  HyperStar: Phase-Type Fitting Made Easy , 2012, 2012 Ninth International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems.

[10]  Lorenzo Ridi,et al.  Transient analysis of non-Markovian models using stochastic state classes , 2012, Perform. Evaluation.

[11]  Rolf Dach,et al.  Technical Report 2012 , 2013 .

[12]  Andrea Bondavalli,et al.  Markov Regenerative Stochastic Petri Nets to Model and Evaluate Phased Mission Systems Dependability , 2001, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[13]  Laura Carnevali,et al.  A Framework for Simulation and Symbolic State Space Analysis of Non-Markovian Models , 2011, SAFECOMP.

[14]  André L.H. Costa,et al.  STEADY-STATE modeling and simulation of pipeline networks for compressible fluids , 1998 .

[15]  Laura Carnevali,et al.  Oris: a tool for modeling, verification and evaluation of real-time systems , 2010, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer.

[16]  Hoon Choi,et al.  Markov Regenerative Stochastic Petri Nets , 1994, Perform. Evaluation.

[17]  P. Glynn A GSMP formalism for discrete event systems , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[18]  H Chatley,et al.  CORRESPONDENCE. TURBULENT FLOW IN PIPES, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE TRANSITION REGION BETWEEN THE SMOOTH AND ROUGH PIPE LAWS. (INCLUDES PLATES). , 1939 .

[19]  Mark-Alexander Sujan,et al.  Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[20]  Andrea Bobbio,et al.  Markov regenerative SPN with non-overlapping activity cycles , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Computer Performance and Dependability Symposium.

[21]  Laura Carnevali,et al.  Using Stochastic State Classes in Quantitative Evaluation of Dense-Time Reactive Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[22]  Laura Carnevali,et al.  Stochastic Time Petri Nets , 2008 .

[23]  Gianfranco Ciardo,et al.  A Characterization of the Stochastic Process Underlying a Stochastic Petri Net , 1994, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[24]  Jolanta Szoplik,et al.  The Gas Transportation in a Pipeline Network , 2012 .

[25]  José Luis Risco Martín,et al.  Modeling and simulation of a gas distribution pipeline network , 2009 .

[26]  Laura Carnevali,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of availability measures of gas distribution networks , 2013, VALUETOOLS.