Hydroseek: an ontology-aided data discovery system for hydrologic sciences

Search engines have made considerable contributions to the overall web experience. However locating scientific data remains a problem since databases are not readily accessible by search engine bots. Considering different temporal, spatial and thematic coverage of different scientific data repositories, especially for interdisciplinary research it is typically necessary to work with multiple data sources. Today integration of hydrologic data sources are mostly at the level of content aggregation by providing links to several data providers on a web page. However being able to query multiple databases simultaneously is a feature that has been sought after since the first data repositories; USGS' National Water Information System (NWIS) and EPA's Storage and Retrieval System (EPA STORET) came online. This study examines the current state of hydrologic data availability and dissemination in the US. It identifies the data accessibility problem and suggests a data discovery mechanism named Hydroseek as a solution. Hydroseek enables querying multiple hydrologic data repositories through a single interface and effectively combines spatial, temporal and thematic aspects of search in order to make it possible to discover more of the desired data in less time. It provides a unified view despite heterogeneity issues within and among data repositories, allows data discovery using keywords which eliminates the need to know source specific parameter codes, improves data browsing capabilities by incorporating data classification based on conceptual hierarchy and has an interface design capable of providing access to a large data inventory without overwhelming the user. System's performance was evaluated based on statistical analysis of a user study in which users were asked to perform a certain data retrieval task using currently available systems and Hydroseek .

[1]  Gordon I. McCalla,et al.  The knowledge frontier: essays in the representation of knowledge , 1987 .

[2]  Michael Kifer,et al.  Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages , 1995, JACM.

[3]  William A. Woods,et al.  What's in a Link: Foundations for Semantic Networks , 1975 .

[4]  Fahiem Bacchus,et al.  Representing and reasoning with probabilistic knowledge - a logical approach to probabilities , 1991 .

[5]  Of references. , 1966, JAMA.

[6]  K. Tilak,et al.  The toxicity of ammonia, nitrite and nitrate to the fish, Catla catla (Hamilton). , 2002, Journal of environmental biology.

[7]  Robert G. Reynolds,et al.  Comprehensive Large Array-data Stewardship System (CLASS)A Fully-distributed System , 2005 .

[8]  P. Hayes The Logic of Frames , 1981 .

[9]  A. Burgun,et al.  From an ontology-based search engine towards a more flexible integration for medical and biological information , 2003 .

[10]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  John Yen,et al.  Using fuzzy ontology for query refinement in a personalized abstract search engine , 2001, Proceedings Joint 9th IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference (Cat. No. 01TH8569).

[12]  Charles F. Goldfarb,et al.  SGML handbook , 1990 .

[13]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .

[14]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[15]  D. Bobrow,et al.  Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science , 1975 .

[16]  Regina Dunlea,et al.  Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) , 2005 .

[17]  Robert G. Raskin,et al.  Knowledge representation in the semantic web for Earth and environmental terminology (SWEET) , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[18]  H. S. Kunii,et al.  DBMS with graph data model for knowledge handling , 1987, FJCC.

[19]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[20]  John F. Sowa,et al.  A conceptual schema for Knowledge-based systems , 1981, Workshop on Data Abstraction, Databases and Conceptual Modelling.

[21]  Lipika Dey,et al.  Ontology Aided Query Expansion for Retrieving Relevant Texts , 2005, AWIC.

[22]  Lola M. Olsen Controlled Vocabularies Boost International Participation and Normalization of Searches , 2006 .

[23]  Hideko S. Kunii Graph data model and its data language , 1990 .

[24]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Si-SEEKER: Ontology-Based Semantic Search over Databases , 2006, KSEM.

[25]  Alex Borgiday On the Relative Expressiveness of Description Logics and Predicate Logics , 1996 .

[26]  William C Reinhold,et al.  MatchMiner: a tool for batch navigation among gene and gene product identifiers , 2003, Genome Biology.

[27]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantic Interoperability in Global Information Systems: A Brief Introduction to the Research Area a , 1999 .

[28]  Lucien Tesnière Éléments de syntaxe structurale , 1959 .

[29]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  Practical Reasoning for Expressive Description Logics , 1999, LPAR.

[30]  John Yen,et al.  A fuzzy ontology-based abstract search engine and its user studies , 2001, 10th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. (Cat. No.01CH37297).

[31]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[32]  R. Fielding,et al.  Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures (CHAPTER 5) , 2000 .

[33]  Adam Pease,et al.  IEEE standard upper ontology: a progress report , 2002, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[34]  Bin Zhu,et al.  MedTextus: an intelligent web-based medical meta-search system , 2002, JCDL '02.

[35]  Ronald J. Brachman,et al.  An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System , 1985, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  Peter Szolovits,et al.  What Is a Knowledge Representation? , 1993, AI Mag..

[37]  Michael Piasecki,et al.  Ontomet: ontology metadata framework , 2004 .

[38]  Raymond Turner,et al.  Logics in Artificial Intelligence , 1994, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[39]  Jesse James Garrett Ajax: A New Approach to Web Applications , 2007 .

[40]  R. Carnap Empiricism , Semantics , and Ontology , 2007 .

[41]  Vinay K. Chaudhri,et al.  XOL: An XML-Based Ontology Exchange Language , 2000 .

[42]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[43]  Juan-Zi Li,et al.  Weighted Ontology-Based Search Exploiting Semantic Similarity , 2006, APWeb.

[44]  國井 秀子 Graph data model and its data language , 1990 .

[45]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications , 2003, Description Logic Handbook.

[46]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Ontology as a Search-Tool: A Study of Real Users' Query Formulation With and Without Conceptual Support , 2005, ECIR.

[47]  Louis H. Kauffman,et al.  The mathematics of Charles Sanders Peirce , 2001, Cybern. Hum. Knowing.

[48]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  XML, bioinformatics and data integration , 2001, Bioinform..

[49]  Peter D. Karp,et al.  OKBC: A Programmatic Foundation for Knowledge Base Interoperability , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[50]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a Web Ontology Language , 2003, J. Web Semant..

[51]  Larry Kerschberg,et al.  Knowledge Sifter: Agent-Based Ontology-Driven Search over Heterogeneous Databases Using Semantic Web Services , 2004, ICSNW.

[52]  Richard Fikes,et al.  The Ontolingua Server: a tool for collaborative ontology construction , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[53]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Building large knowledge-based systems , 1989 .

[54]  Paul O'Brien,et al.  Issues in Ontology-based Information Integration , 2001, OIS@IJCAI.

[55]  Arie van Deursen,et al.  An Architectural Style for Ajax , 2006, 2007 Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA'07).

[56]  Patrick Emery,et al.  Extending the Unified Modeling Language for ontology development , 2002, Software and Systems Modeling.

[57]  Alejandro Pazos Sierra,et al.  Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence , 2008 .

[58]  Hyun Hee Kim ONTOWEB: Implementing an ontology-based Web retrieval system , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[59]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  Reasoning in Expressive Description Logics , 2001, Handbook of Automated Reasoning.

[60]  York Sure,et al.  First Results of a Semantic Web Technologies Evaluation , 2002 .

[61]  Linda Dailey Paulson,et al.  Building Rich Web Applications with Ajax , 2005, Computer.

[62]  N. F. Noy,et al.  Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology , 2001 .

[63]  Dave Elliman,et al.  Ontology languages for the semantic web: A never completely updated review , 2006, Knowl. Based Syst..

[64]  Surajit Chaudhuri,et al.  An overview of data warehousing and OLAP technology , 1997, SGMD.

[65]  Dave Crane,et al.  Ajax in Action , 2005 .

[66]  James P. Henne,et al.  Toxicity of ammonia and nitrite to the Gila trout , 2003 .

[67]  Michael Piasecki,et al.  Engineering new paths to water data , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[68]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  The Role of Frame-Based Representation on the Semantic Web , 2001 .

[69]  M R Quillian,et al.  Word concepts: a theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. , 1967, Behavioral science.