The Independent Perceptual Calibration of Action-Neutral and -Referential Environmental Properties

Two experiments were conducted to explore how the calibration of perception of environmental properties taken with reference to an animal and their action capabilities (e.g., affordances) and those that are independent of action capabilities (e.g., metric properties) relate. In both experiments, participants provided reports of the maximum height they could reach above their head with a number of different stick(s) (reach-with-stick height) and the length of those stick(s), a property that is a constituent of reach-with-stick height. In Experiment 1 reach-with-stick height reports improved over trials whereas stick length reports remained constant. In Experiment 2, feedback about maximum reach-with-stick height improved perception of this affordance, but such improvements did not transfer to perception of stick length in a pretest/practice task/posttest design. The results suggest that the perceptual calibration with practice perceiving or feedback about actual dimensions of action-referential and action-neutral properties do not necessarily depend on one another.

[1]  A. Chemero An Outline of a Theory of Affordances , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[2]  D. Rumelhart Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition , 2017 .

[3]  Lea Fleischer,et al.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 2016 .

[4]  Brandon J. Thomas The Independence of Animal-Neutral and -Referential Environmental Properties , 2016 .

[5]  J. Wagman As Easy to Move as a Feather: Perception of Lightness as Ease to Move , 2015, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  Michael A Riley,et al.  Remembered affordances reflect the fundamentally action-relevant, context-specific nature of visual perception. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Michael A. Riley,et al.  Discovering your inner Gibson: Reconciling action-specific and ecological approaches to perception–action , 2014, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[8]  Geoffrey P Bingham,et al.  Perturbation of perceptual units reveals dominance hierarchy in cross calibration. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Geoffrey P Bingham,et al.  Calibration is action specific but perturbation of perceptual units is not. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  T. Higuchi,et al.  Improvements in perception of maximum reaching height transfer to increases or decreases in reaching ability. , 2014, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  Takahiro Higuchi,et al.  Can perception of aperture passability be improved immediately after practice in actual passage? Dissociation between walking and wheelchair use , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Is calibration of the perception of length modality-independent? , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Sally A. Linkenauger,et al.  Perception viewed as a phenotypic expression , 2013 .

[14]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline , 2013 .

[15]  Brian Day,et al.  Perception of Maximum Reaching Height When the Means of Reaching Are No Longer in View , 2013 .

[16]  Kari S. Kretch,et al.  Cliff or step? Posture-specific learning at the edge of a drop-off. , 2013, Child development.

[17]  M T Turvey,et al.  An archer's perceived form scales the "hitableness" of archery targets. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Transfer of recalibration from audition to touch: modality independence as a special case of anatomical independence. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Perception of maximum reaching height reflects impending changes in reaching ability and improvements transfer to unpracticed reaching tasks , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Takahiro Higuchi,et al.  Athletic experience influences shoulder rotations when running through apertures. , 2011, Human movement science.

[21]  J. Witt Action’s Effect on Perception , 2011 .

[22]  Alen Hajnal,et al.  Transfer of calibration between hand and foot: Functional equivalence and fractal fluctuations , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Ethan R. Van Norman,et al.  Transfer of calibration in dynamic touch: What do perceivers learn when they learn about length of a wielded object? , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology the Influence of Athletic Experience and Kinematic Information on Skill-relevant Affordance Perception , 2022 .

[25]  J. Wagman,et al.  Nested prospectivity in perception: Perceived maximum reaching height reflects anticipated changes in reaching ability , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  William H Warren,et al.  The Direction of Walking—but Not Throwing or Kicking—Is Adapted by Optic Flow , 2010, Psychological science.

[27]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Perceiving action boundaries: Learning effects in perceiving maximum jumping-reach affordances , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[28]  C. Michaels,et al.  Transfer of Calibration Between Length and Sweet-Spot Perception by Dynamic Touch , 2007 .

[29]  S. Harnad Symbol grounding problem , 1991, Scholarpedia.

[30]  Rob Withagen,et al.  The role of feedback information for calibration and attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Rob Withagen,et al.  Transfer of calibration in length perception by dynamic touch , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Metamers in the haptic perception of heaviness and moveableness , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  M. Riley,et al.  Haptically Perceiving Whole and Partial Rod Length at the Small Scale , 2003 .

[34]  T. Stoffregen Affordances as Properties of the Animal-Environment System , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[35]  Rob Withagen,et al.  The Calibration of Walking Transfers to Crawling: Are Action Systems Calibrated? , 2002 .

[36]  Otmar Bock,et al.  Transfer of sensorimotor adaptation between different movement categories , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  On specification and the senses , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  K. Adolph Specificity of Learning: Why Infants Fall Over a Veritable Cliff , 2000, Psychological science.

[39]  Thomas A. Stoffregen,et al.  Affordances and Events , 2000 .

[40]  A. Chemero What Events Are , 2000 .

[41]  M T Turvey,et al.  Perceptual independence of whole length, partial length, and hand position in wielding a rod. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Further Evidence of Perceptual Independence (Specificity) in Dynamic Touch , 1999 .

[43]  E L Amazeen,et al.  Perceptual independence of size and weight by dynamic touch. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  John J. Rieser,et al.  The recalibration of rotational locomotion , 1999 .

[45]  G P Bingham,et al.  The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  M T Turvey,et al.  Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Anne E. Garing,et al.  Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  M. Turvey,et al.  Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the “muscular sense” , 1994, Neuroscience.

[49]  M T Turvey,et al.  Role of the inertia tensor in perceiving object orientation by dynamic touch. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Predicting similarity and categorization from identification. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[51]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[52]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  N. Perrin,et al.  Varieties of perceptual independence. , 1986, Psychological review.

[54]  J. Mandler Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Schema Theory , 1984 .

[55]  W. Epstein,et al.  Percept—Percept Couplings , 1982, Perception.

[56]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[57]  E. Gibson Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .