Semidefinite relaxations of equivalent optimal power flow problems: An illustrative example

Recently, there has been significant interest in convex relaxations of the optimal power flow (OPF) problem. A semidefinite relaxation globally solves many OPF problems. However, there exist practical problems for which the semidefinite relaxation fails to yield the global solution. Conditions for the success or failure of the semidefinite relaxation are valuable for determining whether the relaxation is appropriate for a given OPF problem. To move beyond existing conditions, which only apply to a limited class of problems, a typical conjecture is that failure of the semidefinite relaxation can be related to physical characteristics of the system. By presenting an example OPF problem with two equivalent formulations, this paper demonstrates that physically based conditions cannot universally explain algorithm behavior. The semidefinite relaxation fails for one formulation but succeeds in finding the global solution to the other formulation. Since these formulations represent the same system, success (or otherwise) of the semidefinite relaxation must involve factors beyond just the network physics.

[1]  Daniel K. Molzahn,et al.  Investigation of Non-zero Duality Gap Solutions to a Semidefinite Relaxation of the Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  S. Low,et al.  Zero Duality Gap in Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  L. Ni,et al.  Parallel processing for the load flow of power systems: the approach and applications , 1989, Proceedings of the 28th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,.

[4]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Moment-based relaxation of the optimal power flow problem , 2013, 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference.

[5]  Jesse T. Holzer,et al.  Implementation of a Large-Scale Optimal Power Flow Solver Based on Semidefinite Programming , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Convex Relaxation of Optimal Power Flow—Part I: Formulations and Equivalence , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[7]  Paul A. Trodden,et al.  Local Solutions of the Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  I. Hiskens,et al.  Convexity of the set of feasible injections and revenue adequacy in FTR markets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Javad Lavaei,et al.  Convex Relaxation for Optimal Power Flow Problem: Mesh Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.