The Impact of Haptic Learning in Telemanipulator-assisted Surgery

Background The use of a telemanipulator requires special training and surgical performance is associated with a learning curve. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the potential value of Haptic-Visual over Visual-Only passive Training in telemanipulator-assisted surgery. Methods Two telemanipulator consoles (da Vinci, Intuitive Surgical) were linked through an Application Programer's Interface allowing the applicant at the training console to register the position and passively follow the motions of the instructor's master telemanipulators (MTMs) at the master console (Haptic-Visual Learning group, HVL). The applicant could not actively interfere with the MTM movements. Both the trainee and the instructor shared the same 3-dimensional vision. Alternatively, subjects received only standard visual training without touching the MTMs (Visual-Only Learning group, VL). A standardized demonstration of tasks and the system was given for both groups. Participants (n=20) without previous experience with telemanipulation performed a set of various tasks in a randomized order. Study end points were time and accuracy required to perform the different task. Results The first task, with moving items to appropriate locations, showed differences in time to perform the task [mean: 4:06 min (HVL) vs. 5:16 min (VL) (P=0.2)] and accuracy differed among groups [mean number of errors 1.7 (VL) vs. 1.3 (HVL) P=0.38]. With more challenging tasks [cut out round figures (cut) and performing double dot suture lines (sti)] the number of errors was less in the HVL group [mean: 1.1 errors (cut) (P=0.05) and 1.8 errors (sti) (P=0.26)] compared with the VL group [mean: 1.8 errors (cut) and 2.3 errors (sti)]. In addition, the time to perform the tasks decreased in the HVL group with mean: 5.42 minutes (cut) (P=0.26) and 9.41 minutes (sti) (P=0.36) compared with the VL group with mean: 7.09 minutes (cut) and 11.43 minutes (sti). Conclusions This study demonstrated the impact of haptic-visual passive learning in telemanipulator-assisted surgery which may alter the training for telemanipulator-assisted endoscopic procedures.

[1]  B. Hannaford,et al.  Task decomposition of laparoscopic surgery for objective evaluation of surgical residents' learning curve using hidden Markov model. , 2002, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[2]  Frank Tendick,et al.  Haptic guidance: experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[3]  M. Sile O'Modhrain,et al.  The Virtual Teacher , 1999 .

[4]  James A. Young,et al.  Robotic Surgical Training in an Academic Institution , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[5]  Makoto Hashizume,et al.  A new era of robotic surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. , 2002, Surgery.

[6]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[7]  A. García-Ruiz,et al.  Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. , 1998, Archives of surgery.

[8]  J. Fann,et al.  Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  B Cagir,et al.  The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 1994, Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery.

[10]  Abhishek Gupta,et al.  Shared Control in Haptic Systems for Performance Enhancement and Training , 2006 .

[11]  Leonid Zhukov,et al.  Measurements of the level of surgical expertise using flight path analysis from da Vinci robotic surgical system. , 2003, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[12]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  C. Marano,et al.  To err is human. Building a safer health system , 2005 .

[14]  F. Mohr,et al.  Total endoscopic computer enhanced coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2000, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[15]  M. Cadeddu,et al.  Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections , 2001, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[16]  V. Shayani,et al.  Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[17]  Shahram Payandeh,et al.  On defining metrics for assessing laparoscopic surgical skills in a virtual training environment. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[18]  S. Dinçler,et al.  [Learning curve--calculation and value in laparoscopic surgery]. , 2005, Therapeutische Umschau. Revue therapeutique.

[19]  C. Bennett,et al.  The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club. , 1995, American journal of surgery.

[20]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Analysis of surgical movements during suturing in laparoscopy. , 1994, Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies.

[21]  M. Curet,et al.  Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. , 2005, Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery.

[22]  J. K. Salisbury,et al.  Dexterity enhancement in endoscopic surgery by a computer-controlled mechanical wrist , 1999 .