Trimethoprim-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in urinary tract infection.

The incidence of trimethoprim-resistant Enterobacteriaceae has not increased since the introduction of the combination trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) into the clinical use at our centre in 1973. Using the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as the index of trimethoprim resistance, this ranged from 1.6 to 800 mug/ml; for the majority of isolates it lay between 1.6 and 12.5 mug/ml. About half of these trimethoprim-resistant organisms were sensitive to sulfonamide. In vitro data suggest that organisms resistant to sulfonamide as well as to trimethoprim, where the MIC for the former drug is 3.1 mug/ml or less, will be susceptible to the combination. More resistant organisms, i.e., those for which the MIC of trimethoprim is 6.2 mug/ml or more, often appear quite resistent to the combination. There is no evidence that previous therapy with TMP-SMX is a significant predisposing factor to infection with these organisms, although there is a significant correlation between previous TMP-SMX therapy and infection with organisms with a high level of trimethoprim resistance. Organisms harbouring R-factor resistance or thymine-dependent mutants were not encountered during the course of this study.

[1]  C. Amies Letter: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: in vitro sensitivity of 1000 clinical isolates. , 1974, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[2]  N. Datta,et al.  Trimethoprim R factors in enterobacteria from clinical specimens. , 1974, Journal of medical microbiology.

[3]  M. Fleming Trimethoprim-resistance and its transferability in E. coli isolated from calves treated with trimethoprim-sulphadiazine: a two year study , 1973, Epidemiology and Infection.

[4]  R. Gleckman A cooperative controlled study of the use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in chronic urinary tract infections. , 1973, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[5]  G. Harding,et al.  Efficacy of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole in Bacteriuria , 1973 .

[6]  S. Bushby,et al.  Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: in vitro microbiological aspects. , 1973, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[7]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Pharmacokinetic profile of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in man. , 1973, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[8]  W. Brumfitt,et al.  Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of bacteriuria in women. , 1973, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[9]  R. Maskell,et al.  Thymine-requiring mutants of Proteus mirabilis selected by co-trimoxazole in vivo. , 1973, Journal of general microbiology.

[10]  R. Lacey,et al.  Present significance of resistance to trimethoprim and sulphonamides in coliforms, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus faecalis , 1973, Journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  J. Smith,et al.  Joint trimethoprim and sulphamethoxazole resistance in bacteria infected with R factors. , 1973, Journal of medical microbiology.

[12]  A. Fowle THE DOSAGE OF SEPTRIN , 1973, The Medical journal of Australia.

[13]  J. Hutchison,et al.  Characteristics of some co-trimoxazole-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from infected patients , 1972, Journal of clinical pathology.

[14]  N. Datta,et al.  Trimethoprim resistance conferred by W plasmids in Enterobacteriaceae. , 1972, Journal of general microbiology.

[15]  N. Datta,et al.  Trimethoprim Resistance determined by R Factors , 1972, British medical journal.

[16]  F. O'grady,et al.  Long-term treatment of persistent or recurrent urinary tract infection with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. , 1973, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[17]  J. Klastersky Double-blind trial to compare two dosages of co-trimoxazole in the treatment of hospital infections. , 1973, Chemotherapy.