The stability effects of protein mutations appear to be universally distributed.

How the thermodynamic stability effects of protein mutations (DeltaDeltaG) are distributed is a fundamental property related to the architecture, tolerance to mutations (mutational robustness), and evolutionary history of proteins. The stability effects of mutations also dictate the rate and dynamics of protein evolution, with deleterious mutations being the main inhibitory factor. Using the FoldX algorithm that attempts to computationally predict DeltaDeltaG effects of mutations, we deduced the overall distributions of stability effects for all possible mutations in 21 different globular, single domain proteins. We found that these distributions are strikingly similar despite a range of sizes and folds, and largely follow a bi-Gaussian function: The surface residues exhibit a narrow distribution with a mildly destabilizing mean DeltaDeltaG ( approximately 0.6 kcal/mol), whereas the core residues exhibit a wider distribution with a stronger destabilizing mean ( approximately 1.4 kcal/mol). Since smaller proteins have a higher fraction of surface residues, the relative weight of these single distributions correlates with size. We also found that proteins evolved in the laboratory follow an essentially identical distribution, whereas de novo designed folds show markedly less destabilizing distributions (i.e. they seem more robust to the effects of mutations). This bi-Gaussian model provides an analytical description of the predicted distributions of mutational stability effects. It comprises a novel tool for analyzing proteins and protein models, for simulating the effect of mutations under evolutionary processes, and a quantitative description of mutational robustness.

[1]  M. Reetz.  Changing the enantioselectivity of enzymes by directed evolution. , 2004, Methods in enzymology.

[2]  L. Serrano,et al.  Stabilization of TRAIL, an all-beta-sheet multimeric protein, using computational redesign. , 2004, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[3]  C. Ofria,et al.  EVOLUTION AND DETECTION OF GENETIC ROBUSTNESS , 2003 .

[4]  L. Serrano,et al.  Prediction of water and metal binding sites and their affinities by using the Fold-X force field. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Almer M van der Sloot,et al.  Designed tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand variants initiating apoptosis exclusively via the DR5 receptor. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Lehmann,et al.  The consensus concept for thermostability engineering of proteins. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[7]  Hongyi Zhou,et al.  Distance‐scaled, finite ideal‐gas reference state improves structure‐derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Robustness–epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein , 2006, Nature.

[9]  N. Taddei,et al.  Insights into acylphosphatase structure and catalytic mechanism , 1997, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[10]  M. Walsh,et al.  A novel ADP- and zinc-binding fold from function-directed in vitro evolution , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[11]  L. H. Bradley,et al.  Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. , 1993, Methods in molecular biology.

[12]  N. Kallenbach,et al.  Stabilization of myoglobin by multiple alanine substitutions in helical positions , 1994, Protein Science.

[13]  L Serrano,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. II. Substructure of barnase and the contribution of different interactions to protein stability. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  B V Reddy,et al.  Use of propensities of amino acids to the local structural environments to understand effect of substitution mutations on protein stability. , 1998, Protein engineering.

[15]  C. Wilke,et al.  Thermodynamics of Neutral Protein Evolution , 2006, Genetics.

[16]  Anthony D. Keefe,et al.  Functional proteins from a random-sequence library , 2001, Nature.

[17]  Contributions of the ionizable amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease. , 1996 .

[18]  Eugene I. Shakhnovich,et al.  Natural selection of more designable folds: A mechanism for thermophilic adaptation , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  D Reichmann,et al.  Binding hot spots in the TEM1-BLIP interface in light of its modular architecture. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  B. Matthews,et al.  The introduction of strain and its effects on the structure and stability of T4 lysozyme. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  David Baker,et al.  Crystal structures and increased stabilization of the protein G variants with switched folding pathways NuG1 and NuG2 , 2002 .

[22]  Designability of lattice model heteropolymers. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  W E Stites,et al.  Energetics of side chain packing in staphylococcal nuclease assessed by exchange of valines, isoleucines, and leucines. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[24]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Fundamentals of molecular evolution , 1990 .

[25]  Christoph Adami,et al.  Thermodynamic prediction of protein neutrality. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Dietmar Schomburg,et al.  Structural analysis and prediction of protein mutant stability using distance and torsion potentials: Role of secondary structure and solvent accessibility , 2006, Proteins.

[27]  M. DePristo,et al.  Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[28]  W E Stites,et al.  Contributions of the large hydrophobic amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[29]  C. Branden,et al.  Introduction to protein structure , 1991 .

[30]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[31]  C. Pál,et al.  An integrated view of protein evolution , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[32]  L. Serrano,et al.  Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  A. G. Day,et al.  Step-wise mutation of barnase to binase. A procedure for engineering increased stability of proteins and an experimental analysis of the evolution of protein stability. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  G. Winter,et al.  Novel folded protein domains generated by combinatorial shuffling of polypeptide segments. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Juno Choe,et al.  Protein tolerance to random amino acid change. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  D. Baker,et al.  Crystal structures and increased stabilization of the protein G variants with switched folding pathways NuG1 and NuG2. , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[37]  David Baker,et al.  Computer-based redesign of a protein folding pathway , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[38]  G. Wagner,et al.  EVOLUTION AND DETECTION OF GENETIC ROBUSTNESS , 2003 .

[39]  R. Godoy-Ruiz,et al.  Relation between protein stability, evolution and structure, as probed by carboxylic acid mutations. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Arlo Z. Randall,et al.  Prediction of protein stability changes for single‐site mutations using support vector machines , 2005, Proteins.

[41]  V. Eijsink,et al.  Selection of mutations for increased protein stability. , 2002, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[42]  Donald Hilvert,et al.  Relative tolerance of mesostable and thermostable protein homologs to extensive mutation , 2006, Proteins.

[43]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Designed to be stable: Crystal structure of a consensus ankyrin repeat protein , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  C. Pickart,et al.  Ubiquitin: structures, functions, mechanisms. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[45]  Richard A Goldstein,et al.  Why are proteins so robust to site mutations? , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  B. Matthews,et al.  Structural and genetic analysis of protein stability. , 1993, Annual review of biochemistry.

[47]  R A Goldstein,et al.  Evolution of model proteins on a foldability landscape , 1997, Proteins.

[48]  F. Arnold,et al.  Protein stability promotes evolvability. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  P. Harbury,et al.  Reverse engineering the (β/α)8 barrel fold , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  R. Sauer,et al.  Tolerance of a protein to multiple polar‐to‐hydrophobic surface substitutions , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[51]  Christopher T. Saunders,et al.  Evaluation of structural and evolutionary contributions to deleterious mutation prediction. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  The 'evolvability' of promiscuous protein functions , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[53]  Frances H Arnold,et al.  Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[54]  A. Fersht,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. I. Theory of protein engineering analysis of stability and pathway of protein folding. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  C. Voigt,et al.  Rational evolutionary design: the theory of in vitro protein evolution. , 2000, Advances in protein chemistry.

[56]  A. Wagner.  Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems , 2005 .

[57]  Marianne Rooman,et al.  PoPMuSiC, rationally designing point mutations in protein structures , 2002, Bioinform..

[58]  Christina Kiel,et al.  The ubiquitin domain superfold: structure-based sequence alignments and characterization of binding epitopes. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[59]  Y. Hashimoto,et al.  Robustness of hen lysozyme monitored by random mutations. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[60]  W E Stites,et al.  Energetics of side chain packing in staphylococcal nuclease assessed by systematic double mutant cycles. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[61]  E. Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  Modeling evolutionary landscapes: mutational stability, topology, and superfunnels in sequence space. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  François Stricher,et al.  The FoldX web server: an online force field , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[63]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Computer-based design of novel protein structures. , 2006, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[64]  D Gilis,et al.  PoPMuSiC, an algorithm for predicting protein mutant stability changes: application to prion proteins. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[65]  Joost Schymkowitz,et al.  Recognizing and defining true Ras binding domains II: in silico prediction based on homology modelling and energy calculations. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[66]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[67]  W. Lim,et al.  Deciphering the message in protein sequences: tolerance to amino acid substitutions. , 1990, Science.

[68]  D. Shortle,et al.  Contributions of the polar, uncharged amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease: evidence for mutational effects on the free energy of the denatured state. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[69]  M. Michael Gromiha,et al.  CUPSAT: prediction of protein stability upon point mutations , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..