Generating redesign suggestions to reduce setup cost: a step towards automated redesign

Abstract All mechanical designs pass through a series of formal and informal redesign steps, involving the analysis of functionality, manufacturability, cost and other life-cycle factors. The speed and efficacy of these steps has a major influence on the lead time of the product from conceptualization to launching. In this paper we propose a methodology for automatically generating redesign suggestions for reducing setup costs for machined parts. Given an interpretation of the design as a collection of machinable features, our approach is to generate alternate machining features by making geometric changes to the original features, and add them to the feature set of the original part to create an extended feature set. The designer may provide restrictions on the design indicating the type and extent of modifications allowed on certain faces and volumes, in which case all redesign suggestions generated by our approach honour those restrictions. By taking combinations of features from the extended feature set generated above, we can generate modified versions of the original design that still satisfy the designer's intent. By considering precedence constraints, we can estimate the setup time that will be required for each design. Any modified design whose setup time is less than that of the original design can be presented to the designer as a possible way to modify the original design.

[1]  Dean B. Edwards,et al.  An Intelligent Design for Manufacturability System for Sheet-metal Parts , 1993 .

[2]  Dana S. Nau,et al.  Systematic approach to analysing the manufacturability of machined parts , 1995, Comput. Aided Des..

[3]  Mark Henderson,et al.  A meta-model for mechanical products based upon the mechanical design process , 1993 .

[4]  J. Dixon,et al.  Engineering Design , 2019, Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering.

[5]  Wynne Hsu,et al.  Feedback approach to design for assembly by evaluation of assembly plan , 1993, Comput. Aided Des..

[6]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Building MRSEV models for CAM applications , 1994 .

[7]  Christian Weber,et al.  Functional features for design in mechanical engineering , 1993 .

[8]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Automated Manufacturability Analysis of Machined Parts , 1995 .

[9]  Martti Mäntylä,et al.  Functional understanding of assembly modelling , 1994, Comput. Aided Des..

[10]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Design and implementation of a prototype intelligent CAD system , 1989 .

[11]  Mark Klein,et al.  Capturing design rationale in concurrent engineering teams , 1993, Computer.

[12]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Estimation of Setup Time for Machined Parts: Accounting for Work-Holding Constraints , 1995 .

[13]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Manufacturing feature instances: which ones to recognize? , 1995, SMA '95.

[14]  Tien-Chien Chang,et al.  Process planning in an automated manufacturing environment , 1991 .

[15]  William A. Wulf,et al.  Capturing design rationale in concurrent engineering teams , 1993 .

[16]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Reducing Setup Cost by Automated Generation of Redesign Suggestions , 1994 .

[17]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Functional representation as design rationale , 1993, Computer.

[18]  A. Redford,et al.  Handbook of product design for manufacturing , 1988 .

[19]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  A systematic approach for analyzing the manufacturability of machined parts , 1993 .

[20]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Extracting alternative machining features: An algorithmic approach , 1995 .

[21]  Stelios Kafandaris,et al.  Expert Process Planning for Manufacturing , 1990 .