Prevalence of basic information technology use by U.S. physicians

AbstractBACKGROUND: Information technology (IT) has been advocated as an important means to improve the practice of clinical medicine. OBJECTIVES: To determine current prevalence of non-electronic health record (EHR) IT use by a national sample of U.S. physicians, and to identify associated physician, practice, and patient panel characteristics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Survey conducted in early 2004 of 1,662 U.S. physicians engaged in direct patient care selected from 3 primary care specialties (family practice, internal medicine, pediatrics) and 3 nonprimary care specialties (anesthesiology, general surgery, cardiology). MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported frequency of e-mail communication with patients or other clinicians, online access to continuing medical education or professional journals, and use of any computerized decision support (CDS) during clinical care. Survey results were weighted by specialty and linked via practice zip codes to measures of area income and urbanization. RESULTS: Response rate was 52.5%. Respondents spent 49 (± 19) (mean 1 ± standard deviation]) hours per week in direct patient care and graduated from medical school 23 (± 11) years earlier. “Frequent” use was highest for CDS (40.8%) and online professional journal access (39.0%), and lowest for e-mail communication with patients (3.4%). Ten percent of physicians never used any of the 5 IT tools. In separate logistic regression analyses predicting usage of each of the 5 IT tools, the strongest associations with IT use were primary care practice (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] ranging from 1.34 to 2.26) and academic practice setting (aORs 2.17 to 5.41). Years since medical school graduation (aOR 0.85 to 0.87 for every 5 years after graduation) and solo/2-person practice setting (aORs 0.21 to 0.55) were negatively associated with IT use. Practice location and patient panel characteristics were not independently associated with IT use. CONCLUSIONS: In early 2004, the majority of physicians did not regularly use basic, inexpensive, and widely available IT tools in clinical practice. Efforts to increase the use of IT in medicine should focus on practice-level barriers to adoption.

[1]  Barak Gaster,et al.  Physicians’ use of and attitudes toward electronic mail for patient communication , 2003, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[2]  Rachel Akers,et al.  Parent and physician attitudes regarding electronic communication in pediatric practices. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[3]  W. Hersh,et al.  Health care information technology: progress and barriers. , 2004, JAMA.

[4]  Robert Kristofco,et al.  Physician internet medical information seeking and on‐line continuing education use patterns , 2002, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[5]  Robert H. Miller,et al.  Physician use of IT: results from the Deloitte Research Survey. , 2004, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[6]  Johan van der Lei,et al.  Case Report: Electronic Messaging Between Primary and Secondary Care: A Four-year Case Report , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  James Hereford,et al.  Patients, physicians, and the Internet. , 2002, Managed care quarterly.

[8]  Brian T. Austin,et al.  Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. , 1996, The Milbank quarterly.

[9]  Johannes C. van der Wouden,et al.  Shared care for diabetes: supporting communication between primary and secondary care , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  D. Bates,et al.  The Costs of a National Health Information Network , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  ETA S. BERNER,et al.  Review Paper: Will the Wave Finally Break? A Brief View of the Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in the United States , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  G Eysenbach,et al.  Responses to unsolicited patient e-mail requests for medical advice on the World Wide Web. , 1998, JAMA.

[13]  Jeremy C Wyatt,et al.  Survey of Doctors' Experience of Patients Using the Internet , 2002, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  D. Gustafson,et al.  An Evidence-Based Approach to Interactive Health Communication: A Challenge to Medicine in the Information Age , 1998 .

[15]  ERIC M. LIEDERMAN,et al.  Research Paper: Web Messaging: A New Tool for Patient-Physician Communication , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  W R Hersh,et al.  How well do physicians use electronic information retrieval systems? A framework for investigation and systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[17]  Johan van der Lei,et al.  Electronic Messaging Between Primary and Secondary Care , 2001 .

[18]  Alejandro R Jadad,et al.  Awareness of sources of peer-reviewed research evidence on the internet. , 2002, JAMA.

[19]  James C. Robinson,et al.  External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases. , 2003, JAMA.

[20]  Anne F. Kittler,et al.  Primary care physician attitudes towards using a secure web-based portal designed to facilitate electronic communication with patients. , 2004, Informatics in primary care.

[21]  E. Hing,et al.  Use of computerized clinical support systems in medical settings: United States, 2001-03. , 2005, Advance data.

[22]  David Wilkin,et al.  Information for health , 2003 .

[23]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[24]  Stephen Wilson,et al.  Quality through Collaboration: The Future of Rural Health , 2006 .

[25]  A. R. Spielberg,et al.  On call and online: sociohistorical, legal, and ethical implications of e-mail for the patient-physician relationship. , 1998, JAMA.

[26]  L. Gostin,et al.  Legal issues concerning electronic health information: privacy, quality, and liability. , 1999, JAMA.

[27]  C. Burt,et al.  Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records? , 2005, Health affairs.

[28]  S. Schoenbaum,et al.  Information technologies: when will they make it into physicians' black bags? , 2004, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[29]  Claudia Pagliari,et al.  A survey of GP attitudes to and experiences of email consultations. , 2004, Informatics in primary care.

[30]  Janet M. Corrigan,et al.  Priority Areas for National Action , 2003 .

[31]  Blackford Middleton,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Accelerating U.S. EHR Adoption: How to Get There From Here. Recommendations Based on the 2004 ACMI Retreat , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[32]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  L. Neinstein,et al.  Utilization of electronic communication (E-mail) with patients at university and college health centers. , 2000, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[34]  Steven J Katz,et al.  Bridging the electronic divide: patient and provider perspectives on e-mail communication in primary care. , 2002, The American journal of managed care.

[35]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care? , 2003, JAMA.

[36]  J P Kassirer,et al.  Patients, physicians, and the Internet. , 2000, Health affairs.

[37]  J C Wyatt,et al.  The origin, content, and workload of e-mail consultations. , 1998, JAMA.

[38]  L. Baker,et al.  Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. , 2003, JAMA.

[39]  Douglas S. Bell,et al.  Research Paper: Is There a Digital Divide among Physicians? A Geographic Analysis of Information Technology in Southern California Physician Offices , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[40]  Janet M. Corrigan,et al.  Priority areas for national action : transforming health care quality , 2003 .

[41]  Melissa M. Honour,et al.  Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. , 2004, Health affairs.

[42]  Rural Economy Division.,et al.  Rural-Urban Continuum Codes for Metro and Nonmetro Counties, 1993 , 1990 .

[43]  P Starr,et al.  Smart technology, stunted policy: developing health information networks. , 1997, Health affairs.