Effect of Capsular Injury on Acromioclavicular Joint Mechanics

Background: Traumatic disruption of the acromioclavicular joint capsule is associated with pain and instability after the injury and may lead to degenerative joint disease. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of transection of the acromioclavicular joint capsule on the kinematics and the in situ forces in the coracoclavicular ligaments in response to external loading conditions. Methods: Eleven fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were tested with use of a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The shoulders were subjected to three loading conditions (an anterior, posterior, and superior load of 70 N) in their intact state and after transection of the acromioclavicular joint capsule. Results: Transection of the capsule resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) increase in anterior translation (6.4 mm) and posterior translation (3.6 mm) but not in superior translation (1.6 mm). The effect of capsule transection on the forces in the coracoclavicular ligaments was also significant (p < 0.05) in response to anterior and posterior loading but not in response to superior loading. However, differences were found between the forces in the trapezoid and conoid ligaments. Under an anterior load, the mean in situ force (and standard deviation) in the trapezoid increased from 14 ± 14 N to 25 ± 19 N, while the mean force in the conoid increased from 15 ± 14 N to 49 ± 23 N, or 227%. In contrast, in response to a posterior load, the mean in situ force in the trapezoid increased from 23 ± 15 N to 38 ± 23 N, or 66% (p < 0.05), while the mean force in the conoid increased only 9%. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: The large differences in the change of force in the conoid and trapezoid ligaments suggest that these ligaments should not be considered as one structure when surgical treatment is considered. Furthermore, transection of the capsule resulted in a shift of load to the coracoclavicular ligaments, which may render the intact coracoclavicular ligaments more likely to fail with anterior or posterior loading. The results of the present study also suggest that the intact coracoclavicular ligaments cannot compensate for the loss of capsular function during anterior-posterior loading as occurs in type-II acromioclavicular joint injuries.

[1]  G. Beim Acromioclavicular joint injuries. , 2000, Journal of athletic training.

[2]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Functional Evaluation of the Ligaments at the Acromioclavicular Joint during Anteroposterior and Superoinferior Translation , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of joint constraints on the in situ force distribution in the anterior cruciate ligament , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  A R Karduna,et al.  Kinematics of the glenohumeral joint: Influences of muscle forces, ligamentous constraints, and articular geometry , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  G A Livesay,et al.  A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to determine in situ forces of knee ligaments. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  A new dynamic testing apparatus to study glenohumeral joint motion. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  G A Livesay,et al.  The use of a universal force-moment sensor to determine in-situ forces in ligaments: a new methodology. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  S Arai,et al.  The use of robotics technology to study human joint kinematics: a new methodology. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  S L Woo,et al.  The effects of knee motion and external loading on the length of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL): a kinematic study. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  Charles A. Rockwood,et al.  Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults , 1991 .

[11]  Cook Da,et al.  Acromioclavicular joint injuries. , 1990 .

[12]  P. Meeder,et al.  [Injuries of the acromioclavicular joint]. , 1988, Aktuelle Traumatologie.

[13]  K. An,et al.  Biomechanical study of the ligamentous system of the acromioclavicular joint. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  M. Post Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management of Acromioclavicular Dislocations , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  W. M. Walsh,et al.  Shoulder strength following acromioclavicular injury , 1985, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  E. A. Codman,et al.  The Shoulder, Rupture of the Supraspinatus Tendon and Other Lesions in or about the Subacromial Bursa , 1984 .

[17]  R. Warren,et al.  An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior motion of the knee. Tibial displacement, rotation, and torque. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  J. Cox The fate of the acromioclavicular joint in athletic injuries , 1981, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  J. Andrish,et al.  Evaluation of the acromioclavicular joint fol lowi ng first- and second-degree sprains , 1978, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  F. Allman Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. , 1967, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  D. Palma,et al.  Surgery of the Shoulder , 1951, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[22]  M. Urist,et al.  Complete dislocations of the acromiclavicular joint; the nature of the traumatic lesion and effective methods of treatment with an analysis of forty-one cases. , 1946, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  A. Thorndike,et al.  Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint , 1942 .

[24]  E. Flatow The biomechanics of the acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular, and scapulothoracic joints. , 1993, Instructional course lectures.