Comparison of the amount of artifacts induced by zirconium and titanium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images

[1]  Solange Kobayashi-Velasco,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of imaging examinations for peri-implant bone defects around titanium and zirconium dioxide implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, Imaging science in dentistry.

[2]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Will Zirconia Implants Replace Titanium Implants? , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[3]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  Zirconium dioxide implants as an alternative to titanium: A systematic review , 2021, Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry.

[4]  D. Tamimi,et al.  Assessment of the efficiency of a pre- versus post-acquisition metal artifact reduction algorithm in the presence of 3 different dental implant materials using multiple CBCT settings: An in vitro study , 2021, Imaging science in dentistry.

[5]  F. Haiter-Neto,et al.  Influence of windowing and metal artefact reduction algorithms on the volumetric dimensions of five different high-density materials: a cone-beam CT study. , 2020, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[6]  B. Mealey,et al.  Evaluation of artifacts generated by titanium, zirconium, and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants on MRI, CT, and CBCT images: A phantom study. , 2019, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[7]  M. Noujeim,et al.  Influence of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Settings on Implant Artifact Production: Zirconia and Titanium. , 2019, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  D. Edelhoff,et al.  Esthetic Evaluation of Maxillary Single-Tooth Zirconia Implants in the Esthetic Zone. , 2019, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[9]  R. C. Fontenele,et al.  Difference in the artifacts production and the performance of the metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool between the buccal and lingual cortical plates adjacent to zirconium dental implant. , 2019, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[10]  Abbas Shokri,et al.  Effect of exposure parameters of cone beam computed tomography on metal artifact reduction around the dental implants in various bone densities , 2019, BMC Medical Imaging.

[11]  R. C. Fontenele,et al.  Magnitude of cone beam CT image artifacts related to zirconium and titanium implants: impact on image quality. , 2018, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[12]  A. Shokri,et al.  Effect of field-of-view size on gray values derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with the Hounsfield unit values from multidetector computed tomography scans , 2018, Imaging science in dentistry.

[13]  K. Devito,et al.  Effect of anatomical region on the formation of metal artefacts produced by dental implants in cone beam computed tomographic images. , 2018, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[14]  A. Khan,et al.  Thirty Years of Translational Research in Zirconia Dental Implants: A Systematic Review of the Literature. , 2017, The Journal of oral implantology.

[15]  M. Noujeim,et al.  Evaluation of artifacts generated by zirconium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images. , 2017, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[16]  A. Mombelli,et al.  Zirconia dental implants: where are we now, and where are we heading? , 2017, Periodontology 2000.

[17]  M. Heiland,et al.  Artefacts in multimodal imaging of titanium, zirconium and binary titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants: an in vitro study. , 2017, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[18]  H. Fakhar,et al.  Effect of Voxel Size and Object Location in the Field of View on Detection of Bone Defects in Cone Beam Computed Tomography , 2016, Journal of dentistry.

[19]  F. Haiter-Neto,et al.  Efficacy of a cone beam computed tomography metal artifact reduction algorithm for the detection of peri-implant fenestrations and dehiscences. , 2016, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[20]  H. Demirturk Kocasarac,et al.  Evaluation and Reduction of Artifacts Generated by 4 Different Root-end Filling Materials by Using Multiple Cone-beam Computed Tomography Imaging Settings. , 2016, Journal of endodontics.

[21]  Anil Kumar Nagarajappa,et al.  Artifacts: The downturn of CBCT image , 2015, Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry.

[22]  Goran I Benic,et al.  In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium, titanium-zirconium and zirconium dioxide implants in cone-beam computed tomography. , 2015, Clinical oral implants research.

[23]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Optimization of dental CBCT exposures through mAs reduction. , 2015, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[24]  A. Parsa,et al.  Assessment of metal artefact reduction around dental titanium implants in cone beam CT. , 2014, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[25]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Quantification of metal artifacts on cone beam computed tomography images. , 2013, Clinical oral implants research.

[26]  Erik Gotfredsen,et al.  Impact of Voxel Size Variation on CBCT-Based Diagnostic Outcome in Dentistry: a Systematic Review , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[27]  I. Grunert,et al.  Dental zirconia implants up to three years in function: a retrospective clinical study and evaluation of prosthetic restorations and failures. , 2013, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[28]  Hans Deyhle,et al.  In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography. , 2013, Clinical oral implants research.

[29]  J. Poorolajal,et al.  Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with intraoral photostimulable phosphor imaging plate for diagnosis of endodontic complications: a simulation study. , 2012, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[30]  F. Esmaeili,et al.  Beam Hardening Artifacts: Comparison between Two Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanners , 2012, Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects.

[31]  Scott D Ganz,et al.  Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. , 2012, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[32]  R Schulze,et al.  Artefacts in CBCT: a review. , 2011, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[33]  L. Xing,et al.  Metal artifact reduction in x-ray computed tomography (CT) by constrained optimization. , 2011, Medical physics.

[34]  Stuart C. White,et al.  CONE-BEAM IMAGING IN DENTISTRY , 2008, Health physics.

[35]  A. Farman,et al.  What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? , 2008, Dental clinics of North America.

[36]  Axel Ruprecht,et al.  Oral and maxillofacial radiology: then and now. , 2008, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[37]  Julia F. Barrett,et al.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[38]  Cosimo Nardi,et al.  Motion artefacts in cone beam CT: an in vitro study about the effects on the images. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[39]  M. Özcan,et al.  Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with intraoral photostimulable phosphor imaging plate for diagnosis of endodontic complications: a simulation study. , 2014, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[40]  A. Parsa,et al.  Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[41]  Janalt Damstra,et al.  Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[42]  C. Blaschke,et al.  Soft and hard tissue response to zirconium dioxide dental implants--a clinical study in man. , 2006, Neuro endocrinology letters.