Self-disclosure on social media: The role of perceived network responsiveness

Abstract Social media sites allow users to instantaneously self-disclose to their entire social network. This creates an opportunity to engage in self-expression that is farther-reaching than ever before, but also a new challenge: managing the risk inherent in self-disclosing to a large and diverse set of people. What guides decisions about how openly to self-disclose in such contexts? Building on theoretical and empirical evidence linking perceived partner responsiveness to open self-disclosure in face-to-face dyadic interactions, we hypothesized that perceptions of a Facebook network's responsiveness would shape people's self-disclosure on Facebook. We also examined whether observers can infer people's perceived network responsiveness from thin-slices of self-disclosure. Across two studies, people who perceived their Facebook network as more (vs. less) responsive self-disclosed more openly on Facebook. Furthermore, observers could infer participants' perceived network responsiveness with some accuracy on the basis of disclosure openness. Implications for the self-disclosure and person perception literatures are discussed.

[1]  Alexander K. Saeri,et al.  Threats to belonging on Facebook: lurking and ostracism , 2015 .

[2]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[3]  Golan Shahar,et al.  Strategic self-presentation on Facebook: Personal motives and audience response to online behavior , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  B. Feeney The dependency paradox in close relationships: accepting dependence promotes independence. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[6]  Lindsay T. Graham,et al.  A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[7]  Amanda L. Forest,et al.  When Social Networking Is Not Working , 2012, Psychological science.

[8]  Perceptions of Sexual Orientation From Minimal Cues , 2017, Archives of sexual behavior.

[9]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. , 2002 .

[10]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[12]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Self‐Disclosure in Spouse and Stranger Interaction A Social Relations Analysis , 1997 .

[13]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Dispositional Pathways to Trust: Self-Esteem and Agreeableness Interact to Predict Trust and Negative Emotional Disclosure , 2017, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  S. Gosling,et al.  e-Perceptions : Personality Impressions Based on Personal Websites , 2004 .

[16]  Emily A. Impett,et al.  Can You See How Happy We Are? Facebook Images and Relationship Satisfaction , 2013 .

[17]  H. Reis,et al.  Social Psychological and Personality Science Social Psychological and Personality Science Perceived Partner Responsiveness Minimizes Defensive Reactions to Failure on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology Association for Research in Personality European Association of Social Psych , 2022 .

[18]  N. Collins,et al.  Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: evidence from experimental and observational studies. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  C. Wortman,et al.  Self-disclosure: an attributional perspective. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Human conversational behavior , 1997, Human nature.

[21]  Erin M. Schumaker,et al.  The Effects of Verbal Versus Photographic Self‐Presentation on Impression Formation in Facebook , 2012 .

[22]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Dyad rapport and the accuracy of its judgment across situations: A lens model analysis. , 1996 .

[23]  Tobias Greitemeyer,et al.  Having Responsive Facebook Friends Affects the Satisfaction of Psychological Needs More Than Having Many Facebook Friends , 2014 .

[24]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream , 2000 .

[25]  Caleb T. Carr,et al.  Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide , 2018, New Media Soc..

[26]  Cheryl J Wakslak,et al.  Communicating with the crowd: speakers use abstract messages when addressing larger audiences. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Z. Rubin Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits , 1975 .

[28]  Sonja Utz,et al.  The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Should I Share That? Prompting Social Norms That Influence Privacy Behaviors on a Social Networking Site , 2017, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[30]  N. Collins,et al.  Is Empathic Accuracy Enough to Facilitate Responsive Behavior in Dyadic Interaction? Distinguishing Ability From Motivation , 2016, Psychological science.

[31]  Marko Hölbl,et al.  Privacy antecedents for SNS self-disclosure: The case of Facebook , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Discount and disengage: How chronic negative expressivity undermines partner responsiveness to negative disclosures. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Mary Ann Collins,et al.  Accurate Social Perception at Zero Acquaintance: The Affordances of a Gibsonian Approach , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[34]  H. Reis,et al.  Intimacy as an interpersonal process. , 1988 .

[35]  David P Mackinnon,et al.  Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods , 2004, Multivariate behavioral research.

[36]  Zach W. Y. Lee,et al.  Self-disclosure in social networking sites: The role of perceived cost, perceived benefits and social influence , 2015, Internet Res..

[37]  D. Keltner,et al.  It’s the Motive That Counts: Perceived Sacrifice Motives and Gratitude in Romantic Relationships , 2017, Emotion.

[38]  Ethan Kross,et al.  When perceptions defy reality: The relationships between depression and actual and perceived Facebook social support. , 2016, Journal of affective disorders.

[39]  L. Miller,et al.  Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Soraya Mehdizadeh,et al.  Self-Presentation 2.0: Narcissism and Self-Esteem on Facebook , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[41]  Y. Trope,et al.  The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. , 1998 .

[42]  S. Jourard The Transparent Self , 1964 .

[43]  J. Omarzu A Disclosure Decision Model: Determining How and When Individuals Will Self-Disclose , 2000 .

[44]  Azy Barak,et al.  Degree and Reciprocity of Self-Disclosure in Online Forums , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[45]  Bradley M. Okdie,et al.  Missed Programs (You Can’t TiVo This One): Why Psychologists Should Study Media , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[46]  Gráinne M. Fitzsimons,et al.  Automatic Activation of Attachment-Related Goals , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[47]  M. Clark,et al.  Willingness to express emotion depends upon perceiving partner care , 2018, Cognition & emotion.

[48]  Natalya C. Maisel,et al.  Responsive behaviors in good times and in bad , 2008 .

[49]  Dieter Frey,et al.  The effect of construal level on risk‐taking , 2015 .

[50]  Susan S. Hendrick,et al.  Self-Disclosure in Intimate Relationships: Associations with Individual and Relationship Characteristics Over Time , 2004 .

[51]  Cory R. A. Hallam,et al.  Online self-disclosure: The privacy paradox explained as a temporally discounted balance between concerns and rewards , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  Nicholas Christakis,et al.  The Taste for Privacy: An Analysis of College Student Privacy Settings in an Online Social Network , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[53]  Fenne große Deters,et al.  Does Posting Facebook Status Updates Increase or Decrease Loneliness? An Online Social Networking Experiment , 2013, Social psychological and personality science.

[54]  Wei Gao,et al.  The dark side of ubiquitous connectivity in smartphone-based SNS: An integrated model from information perspective , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[55]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Perceived Regard Explains Self- Esteem Differences in Expressivity , 2012, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[56]  A. Joinson,et al.  Putting the social (psychology) into social media , 2015 .

[57]  Matthew S. Fritz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect , 2022 .

[58]  Erin E. Hollenbaugh,et al.  Predictors of honesty, intent, and valence of Facebook self-disclosure , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  F. Fincham,et al.  Thin slices of infidelity: Determining whether observers can pick out cheaters from a video clip interaction and what tips them off , 2014 .

[60]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[61]  Ana Levordashka,et al.  Ostracism Online: A social media ostracism paradigm , 2015, Behavior research methods.

[62]  Bareket-BojmelLiad,et al.  Strategic self-presentation on Facebook , 2016 .

[63]  S. Eggermont,et al.  Exploring the Relationships Between Different Types of Facebook Use, Perceived Online Social Support, and Adolescents’ Depressed Mood , 2016 .

[64]  K. Dindia A Comparison of Several Statistical Tests of Reciprocity of Self-Disclosure , 1988 .

[65]  M. Clark,et al.  Motivated cognition in relationships , 2015 .

[66]  Juliane M. Stopfer,et al.  Facebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not Self-Idealization , 2010, Psychological science.

[67]  H. Reis,et al.  Can I tell you how I feel? Perceived partner responsiveness encourages emotional expression. , 2020, Emotion.

[68]  David W. Wilson,et al.  Saving face on Facebook: privacy concerns, social benefits, and impression management , 2018, ICIS.

[69]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  A thin slice perspective on the accuracy of first impressions , 2007 .

[70]  M. Rosenberg Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .

[71]  Lauren J. Human,et al.  Self-Expression on Social Media , 2017, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[72]  Hsin-Yi Huang,et al.  Examining the beneficial effects of individual's self-disclosure on the social network site , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[73]  Amanda L. Forest,et al.  Self-Protective yet Self-Defeating: The Paradox of Low Self-Esteem People's Self-Disclosures , 2016 .

[74]  W. Heirman,et al.  Connecting and protecting? Comparing predictors of self-disclosure and privacy settings use between adolescents and adults , 2012 .

[75]  Lin Qiu,et al.  Emotional disclosure on social networking sites: The role of network structure and psychological needs , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[76]  Kelly A. Brennan,et al.  An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[77]  D. Vogel,et al.  The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-Short Form: Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure , 2007, Journal of personality assessment.

[78]  S. Utz,et al.  The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms , 2009 .

[79]  M. Leary,et al.  Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. , 1995 .

[80]  R. Baron,et al.  Toward an Ecological Theory of Social Perception , 1983 .

[81]  P. Philippot,et al.  Social sharing of emotion : new evidence and new questions , 1998 .

[82]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[83]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  Online social networks: why we disclose , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[84]  N. Ambady,et al.  Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. , 1992 .

[85]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  Statistical control in correlational studies: 10 essential recommendations for organizational researchers. , 2016 .

[86]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Information cascades in complex networks , 2017, J. Complex Networks.

[87]  Tessa V. West,et al.  Accuracy of perceiving social attributes , 2016 .

[88]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Time-dependent gambling: odds now, money later. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[89]  Julie Y. Huang,et al.  The Positives of Negative Emotions: Willingness to Express Negative Emotions Promotes Relationships , 2008 .

[90]  A. Stanton,et al.  Expressing Emotions in Stressful Contexts , 2012 .

[91]  Marianne Schmid Mast,et al.  A brief review of interpersonal sensitivity: Measuring accuracy in perceiving others , 2006 .

[92]  Natalya N. Bazarova Public Intimacy: Disclosure Interpretation and Social Judgments on Facebook , 2012 .

[93]  Caleb T. Carr,et al.  Speech Acts Within Facebook Status Messages , 2012 .

[94]  Nicholas O. Rule,et al.  Perceptions of personality in text-based media and OSN: : A meta-analysis , 2014 .

[95]  HallamCory,et al.  Online self-disclosure , 2017 .

[96]  Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic,et al.  Facebook Psychology: Popular Questions Answered by Research , 2012 .

[97]  P. Furley,et al.  Thin Slices of Athletes’ Nonverbal Behavior Give Away Game Location: Testing the Territoriality Hypothesis of the Home Game Advantage , 2018, Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior.

[98]  Arthur A. Stukas,et al.  Interpersonal processes: the interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[99]  Benjamin Le,et al.  Do we look happy? Perceptions of romantic relationship quality on Facebook , 2015 .

[100]  B. Rimé Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review , 2009 .

[101]  Jennifer L. Bevan,et al.  Negative emotional and cognitive responses to being unfriended on Facebook: An exploratory study , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[102]  V. Derlega,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships: Self-Disclosure in Personal Relationships , 2006 .

[103]  Saraswathi Bellur,et al.  Misery rarely gets company: The influence of emotional bandwidth on supportive communication on Facebook , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[104]  Ethan Zell,et al.  Accuracy of Social Perception: An Integration and Review of Meta-Analyses , 2015 .

[105]  Nicholas O. Rule,et al.  Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50 ms , 2008 .

[106]  Marc J. Dupuis,et al.  "I Got the Job!": An exploratory study examining the psychological factors related to status updates on facebook , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[107]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[108]  H. Gray,et al.  On being sad and mistaken: mood effects on the accuracy of thin-slice judgments. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[109]  T. Marshall,et al.  The Big Five, Self-Esteem, and Narcissism as Predictors of the Topics People Write About in Facebook Status Updates , 2015 .

[110]  M. Clark,et al.  How the head liberates the heart: projection of communal responsiveness guides relationship promotion. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[111]  Raymond W. Preiss,et al.  Self-Disclosure Research: Knowledge Through Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[112]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Getting closer and experiencing together: Antecedents and consequences of psychological distance in social media-enhanced real-time streaming video , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[113]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Perceived Partner Responsiveness as an Organizing Construct in the Study of Intimacy and Closeness , 2004 .

[114]  Y. Trope,et al.  The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[115]  Namkee Park,et al.  Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[116]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Saving Human Lives: What Complexity Science and Information Systems can Contribute , 2014, Journal of statistical physics.

[117]  Margaret L. Kern,et al.  Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach , 2013, PloS one.