Continued Treatment Effect of Zoledronic Acid Dosing Every 12 vs 4 Weeks in Women With Breast Cancer Metastatic to Bone: The OPTIMIZE-2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance Zoledronic acid, a potent bisphosphonate, is commonly administered to patients with bone metastases to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs). However, there have been concerns regarding its long-term monthly administration. Objective To examine whether zoledronic acid every 12 weeks was noninferior to zoledronic acid every 4 weeks in patients with metastatic breast cancer that involved the bone who had previously received a standard dosing regimen of zoledronic acid and/or pamidronate disodium. Design, Setting, and Participants OPTIMIZE-2 was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 trial of intention-to-treat (full analysis set), evaluable (per protocol), and safety populations. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive 4.0 mg of intravenous zoledronic acid every 4 or every 12 weeks with placebo for interim infusions for 1 year. The study was conducted at 102 clinical trial centers in the United States from March 3, 2006, to July 25, 2013. Data analysis was performed from October 7, 2013, to March 24, 2014. The study randomized 416 women (≥18 years old) with bone metastases from breast cancer who previously received 9 or more doses of zoledronic acid and/or pamidronate during the first 10 to 15 months of therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the proportion of patients with 1 or more SRE on study (SRE rate). The key secondary end points included time to first SRE and skeletal morbidity rate (SMR). Results A total of 416 women were randomized: 200 patients received zoledronic acid every 4 weeks (mean [SD] age, 59.2 [11.1] years; 173 were white [86.5%]), 203 patients received zoledronic acid every 12 weeks (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [11.2] years; 178 were white [87.7%]), and 13 patients received placebo (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [12.2] years; 13 were white [100%]). Baseline characteristics were similar in both zoledronic acid treatment arms. After 1 year of follow-up, SREs occurred in 44 patients (22.0%) in the zoledronic acid every 4 weeks group and 47 patients (23.2%) in the zoledronic acid every 12 weeks group (proportional difference of −1.2%; 1-sided 97.5% CI bound of the difference in SRE rate between arms, −9.8%; noninferiority P = .02). The time to first SRE between treatment groups was not statistically significantly different (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.70-1.60; P = .79). The mean (SD) SMR was 0.46 (1.06) vs 0.50 (1.50) events per year in the every 4 weeks vs every 12 weeks groups (P = .85). The safety profiles of the every 4 weeks and every 12 weeks groups were comparable, with 189 patients (95.5%) in the every 4 weeks group having at least 1 adverse event compared with 189 (93.5%) in the every 12 weeks group. Conclusions and Relevance The every 12 weeks regimen of zoledronic acid was noninferior to the every 4 weeks regimen for the proportion of patients experiencing 1 or more SRE. These results may have a substantial influence on current clinical practice for treatment of patients with bone metastasis from breast cancer. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00320710

[1]  P. Clézardin,et al.  Emerging therapies in bone metastasis. , 2015, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[2]  John D. Roberts,et al.  CALGB 70604 (Alliance): A randomized phase III study of standard dosing vs. longer interval dosing of zoledronic acid in metastatic cancer. , 2015 .

[3]  G. Pond,et al.  Effects of de-escalated bisphosphonate therapy on bone turnover biomarkers in breast cancer patients with bone metastases , 2014, SpringerPlus.

[4]  D. Amadori,et al.  Efficacy and safety of 12-weekly versus 4-weekly zoledronic acid for prolonged treatment of patients with bone metastases from breast cancer (ZOOM): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  R. Theriault,et al.  Executive Summary of the Clinical Practice Guideline Update on the Role of Bone-Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2013 .

[6]  J. V. Von Roenn,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology executive summary of the clinical practice guideline update on the role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  A. Nowacki,et al.  Understanding Equivalence and Noninferiority Testing , 2011, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[8]  P. Major,et al.  Effect of bisphosphonates on pain and quality of life in patients with bone metastases , 2009, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[9]  Y. Ozisik,et al.  Factors Affecting Survival in Breast Cancer Patients following Bone Metastasis , 2007, Tumori.

[10]  F. Saad,et al.  Pathologic fractures correlate with reduced survival in patients with malignant bone disease , 2007, Cancer.

[11]  B. Vincenzi,et al.  Zoledronic acid in the management of metastatic bone disease , 2006, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[12]  G. H. Nancollas,et al.  Novel insights into actions of bisphosphonates on bone: differences in interactions with hydroxyapatite. , 2006, Bone.

[13]  S. Cremers,et al.  Skeletal Retention of Bisphosphonate (Pamidronate) and Its Relation to the Rate of Bone Resorption in Patients With Breast Cancer and Bone Metastases , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  F. Saad,et al.  Predictive value of bone resorption and formation markers in cancer patients with bone metastases receiving the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  G. Roodman Mechanisms of bone metastasis. , 2004, Discovery medicine.

[16]  K. Weinfurt,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Zoledronic Acid or Pamidronate Disodium for Metastatic Bone Lesions , 2004, Medical care.

[17]  Terry L. Smith,et al.  Is breast cancer survival improving? , 2004, Cancer.

[18]  Wolzt,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[19]  R. Coleman Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies. , 2001, Cancer treatment reviews.

[20]  R. Coleman Skeletal complications of malignancy , 1997, Cancer.

[21]  K. Jaeggi,et al.  Preclinical pharmacology of CGP 42′446, a new, potent, heterocyclic bisphosphonate compound , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  W C Blackwelder,et al.  "Proving the null hypothesis" in clinical trials. , 1981, Controlled clinical trials.