A Model of Crowd Enabled Organization: Theory and Methods for Understanding the Role of Twitter in the Occupy Protests

This analysis establishes a conceptual framework, empirical criteria, and measures for deciding when technology-equipped crowd networks such as Occupy Wall Street behave as organizations. The framework is based on three principles that underlie most organizations: (1) resource mobilization; (2) responsiveness to short-term external conditions; and (3) coordinated long-term change, adaptation, or decline. We argue that Twitter played a coordinating role in Occupy as a connector and dynamic switching mechanism linking various networks. We develop methods for tracking how users embedded and shared links to resource locations. Using a database of some 60 million tweets, we examine different types of links distributed through different hashtags across time, showing how Occupy operated along each theoretical dimension as a networked organization.

[1]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[2]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[3]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[4]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[5]  B. Wellman,et al.  The Network City , 1973 .

[6]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE PAST: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING UNDER AMBIGUITY* , 1975 .

[7]  John D. McCarthy,et al.  The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization , 1977 .

[8]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  J. March.  Footnotes To Organizational Change , 1980 .

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal.  Organizational Adaptation and Environmental Selection-Interrelated Processes of Change , 1991 .

[11]  Robert D. Benford,et al.  Master-frames and cycles of protest , 1992 .

[12]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[13]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Francesca Polletta,et al.  Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics , 1998 .

[15]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[16]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2002 .

[17]  A. Hargadon.  Organizations in Action:Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Book) , 2003 .

[18]  Bruce Bimber.  Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power , 2003 .

[19]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Applying KAoS Services to Ensure Policy Compliance for Semantic Web Services Workflow Composition and Enactment , 2004, SEMWEB.

[20]  D. Hodgson.  Project Work: The Legacy of Bureaucratic Control in the Post-Bureaucratic Organization , 2004 .

[21]  Ruth McNally,et al.  Sociomics! Using the IssueCrawler to map, monitor and engage with the global proteomics research network , 2005, Proteomics.

[22]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[23]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[24]  Axel Bruns,et al.  Methodologies for mapping the political blogosphere: An exploration using the IssueCrawler research tool , 2007, First Monday.

[25]  Manuel Castells,et al.  Communication Power and Counter-power in the Network Society , 2007 .

[26]  Clay Shirky.  Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations , 2008 .

[27]  Peter Malachy Ryan,et al.  Using the Issue Crawler to Map Gun Control Issue-Networks , 2009 .

[28]  Peter Mika,et al.  Making Sense of Twitter , 2010, SEMWEB.

[29]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages , 2010 .

[30]  Efthimis N. Efthimiadis,et al.  Conversational tagging in twitter , 2010, HT '10.

[31]  Annabelle Sreberny,et al.  Blogistan: The Internet and Politics in Iran , 2010 .

[32]  Hsia-Ching Chang,et al.  A new perspective on Twitter hashtag use: Diffusion of innovation theory , 2010, ASIST.

[33]  Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon,et al.  On networks and states - The global politics of Internet governance , 2011, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[34]  J. Alterman.  The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted , 2011 .

[35]  jeanphony.  Teaching Ethnography For User Experience: A Workshop On Occupy Wall Street , 2012 .

[36]  Steven Syrek.  ‘Why am I talking?’ Reflecting on language and privilege at Occupy Wall Street , 2012 .

[37]  M. Castells.  ”Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age”. , 2019 .

[38]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Collective Action in Organizations: Interaction and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change , 2012 .

[39]  Richard A. Rogers.  Mapping and the Politics of Web Space , 2012 .

[40]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Learning from the crowd: Collaborative filtering techniques for identifying on-the-ground Twitterers during mass disruptions , 2012, ISCRAM.

[41]  Cherian George.  The Net Delusion: How not to liberate the world , 2013 .

[42]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The Geospatial Characteristics of a Social Movement Communication Network , 2013, PloS one.

[43]  Michael McCluskey,et al.  The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics, by W. Lance Bennett and Alexandra Segerberg , 2014 .

[44]  W. Lance Bennett,et al.  Organization in the crowd: peer production in large-scale networked protests , 2014 .

[45]  Caitlin Evans Wagner,et al.  The hybrid media system: Politics and power , 2014, New Media Soc..