Quite ordinary retrieval cues may determine free recall of actions

Abstract Typically, action phrases like “break the match” are recalled better if participants are asked to enact the phrases than if they are just asked to remember them. This difference in recall rates is called the enactment effect . In accounts of the enactment effect, the role of differences between action phrases has remained open. In the present paper, it is hypothesized that free recall performance after enactment depends on the presence, during encoding and retrieval, of objects that are interactively encoded with actions and consequently may serve as retrieval cues. This hypothesis was tested in various ways and corroborated in three experiments. Enactment effects were consistently smaller, even nonexistent, for action phrases with objects absent than for phrases where the objects are present in the experimental context during encoding and retrieval.

[1]  B. Brooks,et al.  Age differences in memory for prospective compared with retrospective subject-performed tasks , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[2]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al.  Recall of actions, sentences, and nouns: Influences of adult age and passage of time☆ , 1992 .

[4]  R. L. Cohen,et al.  On the generality of some memory laws , 1981 .

[5]  R. L. Cohen,et al.  Interevent differences in event memory: Why are some events more recallable than others? , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[6]  R. L. Cohen Individual differences in event memory: A case for nonstrategic factors , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[7]  M. C. Steffens The Role of Relational Processing in Memory for Actions: A Negative Enactment Effect in Free Recall , 1999, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  M. Knopf,et al.  Aging and Memory for Action Events: The Role of Familiarity. , 1989 .

[10]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Unitization and grouping mediate dissociations in memory for new , 1989 .

[11]  Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al.  Remembering actions and words , 2000 .

[12]  M. Knopf Memory for action events: Structure and development in adulthood , 1995 .

[13]  G. Einstein,et al.  Relational and item-specific information in memory , 1981 .

[14]  J. Engelkamp,et al.  Categorical and order information in free recall of action phrases , 2001 .

[15]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[16]  L. Bäckman,et al.  Effects of divided attention on free and cued recall of verbal events and action events , 1991 .

[17]  A. Jennekens‐Schinkel,et al.  The human memory: A multi-modal approach revised translation of ‘Das menschliche Gedächtnis’ (1991), by J. Engelkamp and H.D. Zimmer, 1994, Hogrefe and Huber, Toronto, 532 pages US$ 54.00, DM 89.00, ISBN 0-88937-116-4 , 1995, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[18]  A test of resource-allocation explanations of the generation effect , 1990 .

[19]  J. Engelkamp Memory for actions , 1998 .

[20]  Franz Emanuel Weinert,et al.  Memory performance and competencies : issues in growth and development , 1995 .

[21]  J. Engelkamp Organisation and Recall in Verbal Tasks and in Subject-performed Tasks , 1996 .

[22]  Reza Kormi-Nouri,et al.  The nature of memory for action events: An episodic integration view , 1995 .

[23]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Mary Susan Weldon,et al.  Reversing the Picture Superiority Effect , 1987 .

[25]  M. Norris,et al.  Age differences in the recall of actions and cognitive activities: The effects of presentation rate and object cues , 1991, Psychological research.

[26]  J. Engelkamp Memory of Action Events: Some Implications for Memory Theory and for Imagery , 1991 .

[27]  Gilles O. Einstein,et al.  Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. , 1980 .

[28]  Michel Denis,et al.  Cognitive and Neuropsychological Approaches to Mental Imagery , 1988 .

[29]  S. Mewaldt,et al.  The human memory: A multi-modal approach Johannes Engelkamp and Hubert D. Zimmer. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Seattle and Toronto, 1994; ISBN 0-88937-116-4; US$54.00 , 1996, Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy.

[30]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. , 1987 .

[31]  N. Mulligan Generation and hypermnesia. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Walter J. Perrig On the Distinction of Memory Codes: Image Versus Motor Encoding , 1988 .

[33]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. , 1977 .

[34]  L. Bäckman,et al.  New evidence on the nature of the encoding of action events , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[35]  A. Koriat,et al.  The contextualization of input and output events in memory , 1991 .

[36]  M. Dick,et al.  Memory for action events in Alzheimer-type dementia: Further evidence of an encoding failure , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[37]  Variation in external context and adult age differences in action memory. , 1992, Experimental aging research.

[38]  T. B. Rogers A model of the self as an aspect of the human information processing system , 1981 .

[39]  I. Begg,et al.  On the inhibition of reading by generating. , 1988 .

[40]  Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al.  Aging effects in free recall: An exception to the rule. , 1984 .

[41]  T. Helstrup,et al.  Memory for performed and imaged noun pairs and verb pairs , 1989 .

[42]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  SIMILARITY OF MOVEMENT IN RECOGNITION OF SELF-PERFORMED TASKS AND OF VERBAL TASKS , 1995 .

[43]  L. Nyberg,et al.  A component analysis of action events , 1991 .

[44]  B. Winblad,et al.  Memory improvement at different stages of Alzheimer's disease , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  L Nyberg,et al.  The role of enactment in implicit and explicit memory , 1995, Psychological research.

[46]  J Engelkamp,et al.  Pop-out into memory: a retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with the recall of subject-performed tasks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  Wilma A. Winnick,et al.  Two kinds of response priming in tachistoscopic recognition. , 1970 .

[48]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[49]  Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al.  The dual-conception view reexamined: attentional demands and the encoding of verbal and physical information in action events , 1994 .

[50]  W. Wippich,et al.  Implicit memory for textual materials , 1995 .

[51]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Determ inants of Positive and Negative Generation Effects in Free Recall , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[52]  R. L. Cohen,et al.  Memory in educable mentally retarded adults: deficit in subject or experimenter? , 1983 .

[53]  F. Bellezza,et al.  Encoding specificity in free recall. , 1983 .

[54]  L. Nyberg,et al.  Dissociative effects of elaboration on memory of enacted and non-enacted events: a case of a negative effect. , 1995, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology.

[55]  L. Nyberg,et al.  The effect of retrieval enactment on recall of subject-performed tasks and verbal tasks , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[56]  Suzanne Donnenwerth-Nolan,et al.  Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences? A selective interference test , 1981 .

[57]  Donald H. Kausler,et al.  Memory for activities: Adult age differences and intentionality. , 1983 .

[58]  I. H. Öğüş,et al.  NATO ASI Series , 1997 .

[59]  F. Craik,et al.  Additive and interactive effects in memory for subject-performed tasks , 1990 .

[60]  A. Baddeley Domains of recollection. , 1982 .

[61]  W. Schneider,et al.  Memory performance and competencies , 1995 .

[62]  Thomas M. Hess,et al.  Aging and cognition : knowledge organization and utilization , 1990 .

[63]  Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery. , 1985 .

[64]  L. Nilsson,et al.  The role of integration in recognition failure and action memory , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[65]  A. Baddeley Human Memory: Theory and Practice, Revised Edition , 1990 .

[66]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Memory in everyday life , 1993 .

[67]  R. L. Cohen,et al.  The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[68]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Imagery and Cognition , 1991 .

[69]  J. Earles Adult age differences in recall of performed and nonperformed items. , 1996, Psychology and aging.

[70]  J Engelkamp,et al.  Levels-of-processing effects in subject-performed tasks , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[71]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  The Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness , 1993 .

[72]  M. Norris,et al.  Chapter One Adult Age Differences in Activity Memory: Cue and Strategy Utilization , 1990 .