The Multiplex Networks of Strategic Alliances and Follower– Followee Relations Among U.S. Technology Companies

Guided by the ecology theory, this study seeks to understand the interdependency between instrumental and identity resource domains that drives the formation of interorganizational networks. Corresponding to the conceptual distinction of instrumental and identity relations, this study examines the multiplex networks of strategic alliances and follower–followee relations. Eighteen years of alliances data of 150 U.S. technology companies were retrieved from the SDC Platinum database and matched with their current Twitter accounts to obtain the follower–followee network, and the two networks were evaluated with a multivariate exponential random graph model using XPNet. The results confirmed cross-network mechanisms at dyadic and triadic levels and showed that the liability of newness and niche similarity affected the formation of multiplex networks. Theoretical and practical implications of cross-domain multiplexity are discussed.

[1]  T. Lawrence,et al.  The Impact of Virtual Embeddedness on New Venture Survival: Overcoming the Liabilities of Newness 1 , 2007 .

[2]  Edward O. Laumann,et al.  Microstructural analysis in interorganizational systems , 1982 .

[3]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  The Blackwell Companion to Organizations , 2002 .

[4]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[5]  R. Gulati,et al.  The Two Facets of Collaboration: Cooperation and Coordination in Strategic Alliances , 2012 .

[6]  Peng Wang,et al.  Closure, connectivity and degree distributions: Exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks , 2009, Soc. Networks.

[7]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[8]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[9]  Bradley R. Barnes,et al.  A 22 year review of strategic alliance research in the leading management journals , 2016 .

[10]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[11]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Community Ecology and the Sociology of Organizations , 2006 .

[12]  Andrew V. Shipilov,et al.  The Missing Link: The Effect of Customers on the Formation of Relationships Among Producers in the Multiplex Triads , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Pierre Barbillon,et al.  Effects of competition on collective learning in advice networks , 2016, Soc. Networks.

[14]  Simone Ferriani,et al.  The social and economic bases of network multiplexity: Exploring the emergence of multiplex ties , 2013 .

[15]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation , 1994 .

[16]  Andrew Pilny,et al.  HYPERLINKS AS EXTENSIONS OF OFFLINE INSTRUMENTAL COLLECTIVE ACTION , 2012 .

[17]  C. Phelps.  A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation , 2009 .

[18]  Michelle Shumate,et al.  The Symbiotic Sustainability Model: Conceptualizing NGO–Corporate Alliance Communication , 2010 .

[19]  Peng Wang,et al.  Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[20]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Do Equity Financing Cycles Matter?: Evidence from Biotechnology Alliances , 1999 .

[21]  Bing She,et al.  Connecting the dots: A longitudinal observation of relief organizations' representational networks on social media , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[23]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation , 2011 .

[24]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  R. Bakker.  Stepping in and stepping out: Strategic alliance partner reconfiguration and the unplanned termination of complex projects , 2016 .

[26]  G. Carroll,et al.  Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition.By Michael T. Hannan and Glenn R. Carroll. Oxford University Press, 1992. 286 pp. $29.95 , 1992 .

[27]  R. Bakker,et al.  More Than Just a Number? The Conceptualization and Measurement of Firm Age in an Era of Temporary Organizations , 2018, Academy of Management Annals.

[28]  Philippa Pattison,et al.  Manufacturing Relations: An Empirical Study of the Organization of Production Across Multiple Networks , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[29]  P. Pattison,et al.  9. Neighborhood-Based Models for Social Networks , 2002 .

[30]  Christopher P. Holland,et al.  IS in Interorganizational Networks , 2010 .

[31]  Rachelle C. Sampson.  R&D Alliances and Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation , 2007 .

[32]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation , 2000 .

[33]  P. Ingram,et al.  An ecology of ideology: theory and evidence from four populations , 2004 .

[34]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. , 1994 .

[35]  Joel Podolny.  Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[37]  J. Fu.  Unpacking the Influence of Informational, Organizational, and Structural Factors on the Longitudinal Change of the NPO Follower-Followee Network on Twitter , 2019 .

[38]  Tilly Gurman,et al.  Reaching the Global Community During Disasters: Findings From a Content Analysis of the Organizational Use of Twitter After the 2010 Haiti Earthquake , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[39]  Nicholas Harrigan,et al.  Why does everybody hate me? Balance, status, and homophily: The triumvirate of signed tie formation , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[40]  C. Hill,et al.  The Performance of Incumbent firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation , 2003 .

[41]  Michelle Shumate,et al.  Corporate Reporting of Cross-Sector Alliances: The Portfolio of NGO Partners Communicated on Corporate Websites , 2010 .

[42]  Salih Zeki Ozdemir,et al.  The Ecological Interdependence of Emergent and Established Organizational Populations: Legitimacy Transfer, Violation by Comparison, and Unstable Identities , 2006 .

[43]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Organizational Foundings in Community Context: Instruments Manufacturers and Their Interrelationship with Other Organizations , 2006 .

[44]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Communication Network Evolution in Organizational Communities , 2008 .

[45]  X. Luo,et al.  Do Birds of a Feather Flock Higher? The Effects of Partner Similarity on Innovation in Strategic Alliances in Knowledge-Intensive Industries , 2009 .

[46]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Strategic Alliance Networks and Innovation: A Deterministic and Voluntaristic View Combined , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[47]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[48]  D. Knoke.  Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and Findings , 2013 .

[49]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[50]  Wenpin Tsai,et al.  Niche and Performance: The Moderating Role of Network Embeddedness , 2005 .

[51]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  The Evolution of the Children’s Television Community, 1953-2003 , 2008 .

[52]  Sandra González-Bailón,et al.  Opening the black box of link formation: Social factors underlying the structure of the web , 2009, Soc. Networks.

[53]  Gregory D. Saxton,et al.  Engaging Stakeholders Through Twitter: How Nonprofit Organizations Are Getting More Out of 140 Characters or Less , 2010, ArXiv.

[54]  Garry Robins,et al.  Structural Logic of Intraorganizational Networks , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[55]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[56]  Michelle Shumate,et al.  A Taxonomy of Communication Networks , 2013 .

[57]  Michelle Shumate,et al.  Emergence of Multidimensional Social Networks , 2013 .

[58]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[59]  Stanislav D. Dobrev.  Competing in the looking‐glass market: imitation, resources, and crowding , 2007 .

[60]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Organizations evolving (2nd ed.). , 2006 .

[61]  R. Ackland,et al.  Online collective identity: The case of the environmental movement , 2011, Soc. Networks.

[62]  Michael Hannan,et al.  Foundations of a Theory of Social Forms , 2000 .

[63]  A. Stinchcombe.  Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[64]  Toby E. Stuart.  Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry , 1998 .

[65]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[66]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[67]  M. Shumate,et al.  A Nonprofit Perspective on Business–Nonprofit Partnerships: Extending the Symbiotic Sustainability Model , 2018 .

[68]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  The Coevolution of Multiplex Communication Networks in Organizational Communities , 2011 .

[69]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Why Corporate Demography Matters: Policy Implications of Organizational Diversity , 2000 .

[70]  Mario Diani,et al.  The Integrative Power of Civic Networks1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[71]  Cohen R. Simpson.  Multiplexity and strategic alliances: The relational embeddedness of coalitions in social movement organisational fields , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[72]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Social Contagion and Multiplexity Communication Networks as Predictors of Commitment and Role Ambiguity , 1989 .

[73]  Michelle Shumate,et al.  Connective collective action online: An examination of the hyperlink network structure of an NGO issue network , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[74]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[75]  D. Shepherd,et al.  The age-effect of financial indicators as buffers against the liability of newness ☆ , 2010 .

[76]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .