Chemometric analysis of diesel fuel for forensic and environmental applications.

Diesel fuel samples were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and chemometric procedures to associate and discriminate samples for potential use in forensic and environmental applications. Twenty-five diesel samples, representing 13 different brands, were collected from service stations in the Lansing, Michigan area. From the GC-MS data, mass-to-charge ratios were identified to represent aliphatic (m/z 57) and aromatic (m/z 91 and 141) compounds. The total ion chromatogram (TIC) and extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of the chosen ions were evaluated using Pearson product moment correlation (PPMC) and principal component analysis (PCA). Diesel samples from the same brand showed higher PPMC coefficients, while those from different brands showed lower values. EICs generally provided a wider range of correlation coefficients than the TIC, with correspondingly increased discrimination among samples for EIC m/z 91. PCA grouped the diesel samples into four distinct clusters for the TIC. The first cluster consisted of four samples from the same brand, two clusters contained one diesel sample each of different brands, and the fourth cluster contained the remaining diesel samples. The same trend was observed using each EIC, with an increase in the number of clusters formed for EIC m/z 57 and 91. Both statistical procedures suggest aromatic components (specifically, those with m/z 91) provide the greatest discrimination among diesel samples. This conclusion was supported by identifying the chemical components that contribute the most to the variance. The relative amount of aliphatic versus aromatic components was found to cause the greatest discrimination among samples in the data set.

[1]  M. Fingas,et al.  Forensic fingerprinting of diamondoids for correlation and differentiation of spilled oil and petroleum products. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Gregory J. Hall,et al.  Chemometric Determination of Target Compounds Used to Fingerprint Unweathered Diesel Fuels , 2006 .

[3]  D. C. Mann,et al.  COMPARISON OF AUTOMOTIVE GASOLINES USING CAPILLARY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY I: COMPARISON METHODOLOGY , 1987 .

[4]  Richard Saferstein,et al.  Forensic Science Handbook , 2001 .

[5]  M Daszykowski,et al.  A comparison of three algorithms for chromatograms alignment. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. A.

[6]  Jay A Siegel,et al.  Comparison of gasolines using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and target ion response. , 2004, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  Kevin J Johnson,et al.  Classification of gasoline data obtained by gas chromatography using a piecewise alignment algorithm combined with feature selection and principal component analysis. , 2005, Journal of chromatography. A.

[8]  E. du Pasquier,et al.  Chemical fingerprinting of unevaporated automotive gasoline samples. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[9]  P. Gemperline Practical Guide To Chemometrics , 2006 .

[10]  E. du Pasquier,et al.  Chemical fingerprinting of gasoline. Part 3. Comparison of unevaporated automotive gasoline samples from Australia and New Zealand. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[11]  Jay L. Devore,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences , 1982 .

[12]  Frans van den Berg,et al.  Correlation optimized warping and dynamic time warping as preprocessing methods for chromatographic data , 2004 .

[13]  D L Massart,et al.  Chemometric treatment of vanillin fingerprint chromatograms. Effect of different signal alignments on principal component analysis plots. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. A.

[14]  Philip Doble,et al.  Classification of premium and regular gasoline by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, principal component analysis and artificial neural networks. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[15]  D. Massart Chemometrics: A Textbook , 1988 .

[16]  Mary R. Williams,et al.  Covariance mapping in the analysis of ignitable liquids by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[17]  E. du Pasquier,et al.  Chemical fingerprinting of gasoline. 2. Comparison of unevaporated and evaporated automotive gasoline samples. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[18]  J. Yinon,et al.  Forensic Applications of Mass Spectrometry , 1991 .

[19]  Chun Yang,et al.  Characterization, weathering, and application of sesquiterpanes to source identification of spilled lighter petroleum products. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  B. W. Wright,et al.  High-speed peak matching algorithm for retention time alignment of gas chromatographic data for chemometric analysis. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[21]  J. K. Hardy,et al.  Accelerant classification by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and multivariate pattern recognition , 2000 .

[22]  Glenn S. Frysinger,et al.  Oil Spill Source Identification by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography , 1999 .

[23]  G. Tomasi,et al.  Practical aspects of chemometrics for oil spill fingerprinting. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.