Catalyzing Development: A New Vision for Aid

Some may dispute the effectiveness of aid. But few would disagree that aid delivered to the right source and in the right way can help poor and fragile countries develop. It can be a catalyst, but not a driver of development. Aid now operates in an arena with new players, such as middle-income countries, private philanthropists, and the business community; new challenges presented by fragile states, capacity development, and climate change; and new approaches, including transparency, scaling up, and South-South cooperation. The next High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness must determine how to organize and deliver aid better in this environment. Catalyzing Development proposes ten actionable game-changers to meet these challenges based on in-depth, scholarly research. It advocates for these to be included in a Busan Global Development Compact in order to guide the work of development partners in a flexible and differentiated manner in the years ahead. Contributors: Kemal Dervis (Brookings Institution), Shunichiro Honda (JICA Research Institute), Akio Hosono (JICA Research Institute), Johannes F. Linn (Emerging Markets Forum and Brookings Institution), Ryutaro Murotani (JICA Research Institute), Jane Nelson (Harvard Kennedy School and Brookings Institution), Mai Ono (JICA Research Institute), Kang-ho Park (Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Korea), Tony Pipa (U.S. Agency for International Development), Sarah Puritz Milsom (Brookings Institution), Hyunjoo Rhee (Korea International Cooperation Agency), Mine Sato (JICA Research Institute), Shinichi Takeuchi (JICA Research Institute), Keiichi Tsunekawa (JICA Research Institute), Ngaire Woods (University College, Oxford), Sam Worthington (InterAction)

[1]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid , 2004 .

[2]  N. Woods Whose aid? Whose influence? China, emerging donors and the silent revolution in development assistance , 2008 .

[3]  Young-iob Chung South Korea in the Fast Lane: Economic Development and Capital Formation , 2007 .

[4]  C. Fisher Between Pragmatism and Idealism: Implementing a Systemic Approach to Capacity Development , 2010 .

[5]  N. Agapitova,et al.  The capacity development results framework : a strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development , 2009 .

[6]  Giandomenico Majone,et al.  The new European agencies: regulation by information , 1997 .

[7]  Jakob Svensson,et al.  Power to the People: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment of a Community-Based Monitoring Project in Uganda , 2007 .

[8]  Katy Oswald,et al.  Introduction: Why Reflect Collectively on Capacities for Change?1 , 2010 .

[9]  P. Davies A review of the roles and activities of new development partners , 2010 .

[10]  J. Hahn,et al.  Committing to results: Improving the effectiveness of HIV/AIDS assistance : an OED evaluation of the World Bank's assistance for HIV/AIDS control , 2005 .

[11]  Lael S. Brainard Transforming the Development Landscape: The Role of the Private Sector , 2007 .

[12]  Blane Harvey,et al.  Re-imagining Capacity and Collective Change: Experiences from Senegal and Ghana , 2010 .

[13]  Homi Kharas,et al.  Delivering Aid Differently: Lessons from the Field , 2010 .

[14]  Nicholas Sambanis,et al.  Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy , 2003 .

[15]  Santiago Levy,et al.  Progress Against Poverty: Sustaining Mexico's Progresa-Oportunidades Program , 2006 .

[16]  A. Alesina,et al.  Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? , 1998 .

[17]  Paul Mosley,et al.  Foreign aid, its defense and reform , 1987 .