Specifying the dynamics of social technologies as social microworlds

This paper explores the affordances of social technologies for supporting the construction of a shareable artefact by a group of learners. A qualitative study that captures the use of five different types of social technologies (Facebook, blogs, wikis, Google Documents and Dropbox) in three different classroom settings sheds light on the potentials and challenges of these tools for supporting material exploration, artefact construction and evaluation. Qualitative content analysis of instructors’ field notes, students’ and instructors’ reflections, interviews and focus groups sheds light on the potential of social technologies to transform the activity of learning across a new culture of computational tools. The affordances of social technologies are discussed as well as design principles that need to be followed in these new arenas.

[1]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Mapping the landscape of computer-assisted language learning: an inventory of research , 2013, Interact. Technol. Smart Educ..

[2]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Affordances of social technologies as social microworlds , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[3]  Selami Aydin,et al.  A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment , 2012 .

[4]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[5]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Introducing New Perspectives in the Use of Social Technologies in Learning: Social Constructionism , 2013, INTERACT.

[6]  S. Papert.  The children's machine: rethinking school in the age of the computer , 1993 .

[7]  Enosaze Emuze,et al.  Web 2.0: conceptual foundations and marketing issues , 2016 .

[8]  Ruby Vurdien,et al.  Enhancing writing skills through blogging in an advanced English as a Foreign Language class in Spain , 2013 .

[9]  Mimi Li,et al.  Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis , 2013 .

[10]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  CSCL: An historical perspective. , 2006 .

[11]  R. Oldenburg,et al.  The third place , 1982 .

[12]  J. Piaget.  The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .

[13]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[14]  Sílvia Melo-Pfeifer,et al.  Blogs and the development of plurilingual and intercultural competence: report of a co-actional approach in Portuguese foreign language classroom , 2015 .

[15]  Joel Bloch,et al.  ABDULLAH'S BLOGGING: A GENERATION 1.5 STUDENT ENTERS THE BLOGOSPHERE , 2007 .

[16]  Lina Lee.  Blogging: Promoting Learner Autonomy and Intercultural Competence through Study Abroad , 2011 .

[17]  M. Chi.  Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[18]  Klaus Schwienhorst.  The ‘third place’ – virtual reality applications for second language learning , 1998 .

[19]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Patterns of empathy in online communication , 2007, CHI.

[20]  U. Wilensky.  Abstract Meditations on the Concrete and Concrete Implications for Mathematics Education , 1991 .

[21]  Alan Clinton Shaw,et al.  Social construction and the inner city : design environments for social development and urban renewal , 1995 .

[22]  Camilla Vásquez,et al.  Web 2.0 and Second Language Learning: What Does the Research Tell Us? , 2012 .

[23]  Philip J Cowen,et al.  Constructionism , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  Bing Wu,et al.  Empirical study on continuance intentions towards E-Learning 2.0 systems , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[25]  Annika Lantz-Andersson,et al.  Crossing boundaries in Facebook: Students’ framing of language learning activities as extended spaces , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[26]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  New Paradigms for Computing, New Paradigms for Thinking , 1995 .