The scope of this study is two fold: first, it advocates the recognition of the 60/50 Hz, positive-sequence reactive power as the significant reactive power component of apparent power. This nonactive component must be monitored in the same way that the 60/50 Hz active power is monitored under nonsinusoidal conditions. Secondly, this paper documents the fact that instrumentation used today for reactive power measurement is marred by a significant difference between the indicated reactive power and the correct 60/50 Hz reactive power. Regrettably, such instrumentation is still favored by many utilities, instrumentation manufacturers and supervisors of energy markets. This paper documents a wide spectrum of situations that shed light on the discrepancies between the correct value of the reactive power and the measured value.
[2]
P. S. Filipski,et al.
Application of a three phase nonsinusoidal calibration system for testing energy and demand meters under simulated field conditions
,
1988
.
[3]
Alexander Eigeles Emanuel,et al.
Power Definitions and the Physical Mechanism of Power Flow: Emanuel/Power Definitions and the Physical Mechanism of Power Flow
,
2010
.
[4]
A. E. Emanuel,et al.
IEEE Std 1459–2010. IEEE Standard Definitions for the Measurement of Electric Power Quantities under Sinusoidal, Nonsinusoidal, Balanced or Unbalanced Conditions
,
2010
.
[5]
John A. Orr,et al.
On the need for strict second harmonic limits
,
2000
.