Stochastic Choice and Revealed Perturbed Utility

Perturbed utility functions|the sum of expected utility and a non-linear perturbation function|provide a simple and tractable way to model various sorts of stochastic choice. We provide two easily understood conditions each of which characterizes this representation: One condition generalizes the acyclicity condition used in revealed preference theory, and the other generalizes Luce’s IIA condition. We relate the discrimination or selectivity of choice rules to properties of their associated perturbations, both across dierent agents and across decision problems. We also show that these representations correspond to a form of ambiguity-averse preferences for an agent who is uncertain about her true utility.

[1]  Stephen A. Clark A concept of stochastic transitivity for the random utility model , 1990 .

[2]  J. Marschak Binary Choice Constraints on Random Utility Indicators , 1959 .

[3]  Faruk Gul,et al.  Random Expected Utility , 2005 .

[4]  Deliberately Stochastic : Random Choice and Preferences for Hedging Extended , 2015 .

[5]  B. Mellers,et al.  Similarity and Choice. , 1994 .

[6]  Per Olov Lindberg,et al.  Extreme values, invariance and choice probabilities , 2011 .

[7]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Ambiguity Aversion, Robustness, and the Variational Representation of Preferences , 2006 .

[8]  J. Swait,et al.  Probabilistic Choice (Models) as a Result of Balancing Multiple Goals , 2013 .

[9]  Emir Kamenica Contextual Inference in Markets: On the Informational Content of Product Lines , 2008 .

[10]  A game-theoretic approach to the binary stochastic choice problem , 1992 .

[11]  Eric van Damme,et al.  Evolution in Games with Endogenous Mistake Probabilities , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[12]  Salvador Barberà,et al.  Handbook of Utility Theory Volume 1: Principles , 1998 .

[13]  G. Debreu,et al.  Stochastic Choice and Cardinal Utility , 1958 .

[14]  J. Payne,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[15]  Joel Huber,et al.  Market Boundaries and Product Choice: Illustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects , 1983 .

[16]  E. Vandamme Stability and perfection of nash equilibria , 1987 .

[17]  William H. Sandholm,et al.  Learning in Games via Reinforcement and Regularization , 2014, Math. Oper. Res..

[18]  Felix Kubler,et al.  Asset Demand Based Tests of Expected Utility Maximization , 2013 .

[19]  Jean-Claude Falmagne,et al.  A representation theorem for finite random scale systems , 1978 .

[20]  M. Hirsch,et al.  Mixed Equilibria and Dynamical Systems Arising from Fictitious Play in Perturbed Games , 1999 .

[21]  William H. Sandholm,et al.  ON THE GLOBAL CONVERGENCE OF STOCHASTIC FICTITIOUS PLAY , 2002 .

[22]  R. McKelvey,et al.  Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games , 1995 .

[23]  Pietro Ortoleva,et al.  The price of flexibility: Towards a theory of Thinking Aversion , 2013, J. Econ. Theory.

[24]  D. Blackwell Controlled Random Walks , 2010 .

[25]  J. Marschak,et al.  Experimental Tests of Stochastic Decision Theory , 1957 .

[26]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Consistency and Cautious Fictitious Play , 1995 .

[27]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Contributions to Probability and Statistics , 1960 .

[28]  S. Afriat THE CONSTRUCTION OF UTILITY FUNCTIONS FROM EXPENDITURE DATA , 1967 .

[29]  Ryota Iijima Deterministic Equilibrium Selection Under Payoff-Perturbed Dynamics , 2014 .

[30]  Philip Wolfe,et al.  Contributions to the theory of games , 1953 .

[31]  Cautious Expected Utility and the Certainty Effect , 2015 .

[32]  André de Palma,et al.  Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation , 1995 .

[33]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  Extending the Bounds of Rationality: Evidence and Theories of Preferential Choice , 2006 .

[34]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Learning in perturbed asymmetric games , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[35]  A. Palma,et al.  Demand systems for market shares , 2015 .

[36]  Victor H. Aguiar Stochastic Choice and Attention Capacities: Inferring Preferences from Psychological Biases , 2015 .

[37]  L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[38]  Andreu Mas-Colell,et al.  A General Class of Adaptive Strategies , 1999, J. Econ. Theory.

[39]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[40]  Mira Frick Monotone threshold representations , 2016 .

[41]  J. Harsanyi Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points , 1973 .

[42]  C. Kraft,et al.  Intuitive Probability on Finite Sets , 1959 .

[43]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Dynamic Logit with Choice Aversion , 2015 .

[44]  A. Tversky Choice by elimination , 1972 .

[45]  Mark J. Machina,et al.  Stochastic Choice Functions Generated from Deterministic Preferences over Lotteries , 1985 .

[46]  J. Aczél,et al.  Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications , 1968 .

[47]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  STOCHASTIC CHOICE AND REVEALED PERTURBED UTILITY BY DREW FUDENBERG, , 2015 .

[48]  Kota Saito,et al.  Preferences for Flexibility and Randomization under Uncertainty , 2015 .

[49]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Utility theory for decision making , 1970 .

[50]  H. D. Block,et al.  Random Orderings and Stochastic Theories of Responses (1960) , 1959 .

[51]  Faruk Gul,et al.  Random Choice as Behavioral Optimization , 2014 .

[52]  Mark Voorneveld Probabilistic Choice in Games: Properties of Rosenthal’s t-Solutions , 2006, Int. J. Game Theory.

[53]  R. Luce Semiorders and a Theory of Utility Discrimination , 1956 .

[54]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[55]  A. Chernev Product Assortment and Consumer Choice: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2012 .

[56]  A. Dax,et al.  AN ELEMENTARY PROOF OF FARKAS ’ LEMMA , 1997 .

[57]  A. Tversky,et al.  Substitutability and similarity in binary choices , 1969 .

[58]  丸山 徹 Convex Analysisの二,三の進展について , 1977 .

[59]  Robert W. Rosenthal,et al.  A bounded-rationality approach to the study of noncooperative games , 1989 .

[60]  Kota Saito,et al.  Savage in the Market , 2015 .

[61]  H. Houthakker Revealed Preference and the Utility Function , 1950 .

[62]  박상용 [경제학] 현시선호이론(Revealed Preference Theory) , 1980 .

[63]  Yuichi Noguchi Bayesian Learning, Smooth Approximate Optimal Behavior, and Convergence to ε-Nash Equilibrium , 2015 .

[64]  Pietro Ortoleva,et al.  Cautious Expected Utility and the Certainty Effect , 2013 .

[65]  Mark Voorneveld,et al.  Better May be Worse: Some Monotonicity Results and Paradoxes in Discrete Choice Under Uncertainty , 2006 .

[66]  M. Lepper,et al.  When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? , 2000 .

[67]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Heterogeneous beliefs and local information in stochastic fictitious play , 2011, Games Econ. Behav..

[68]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Learning in games with unstable equilibria , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[69]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  Coarse contingencies and ambiguity , 2007 .

[70]  D. Scott Measurement structures and linear inequalities , 1964 .

[71]  Dmitri Kuksov,et al.  When More Alternatives Lead to Less Choice , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[72]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[73]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[74]  Georg Weizsacker,et al.  Flipping a Coin: Theory and Evidence , 2013 .

[75]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[76]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[77]  Achiya Dax,et al.  Classroom Note: An Elementary Proof of Farkas' Lemma , 1997, SIAM Rev..

[78]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Fast convergence in evolutionary equilibrium selection , 2013, Games Econ. Behav..

[79]  Lars-Göran Mattsson,et al.  Probabilistic choice and procedurally bounded rationality , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[80]  Philip J. Reny,et al.  A Characterization of Rationalizable Consumer Behavior , 2014 .

[81]  Itzhak Gilboa,et al.  A necessary but insufficient condition for the stochastic binary choice problem , 1990 .

[82]  J. Harsanyi Oddness of the number of equilibrium points: A new proof , 1973 .

[83]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[84]  Paola Manzini,et al.  Stochastic Choice and Consideration Sets , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[85]  Pietro Ortoleva,et al.  Stochastic Choice and Hedging , 2013 .

[86]  David M. Kreps A REPRESENTATION THEOREM FOR "PREFERENCE FOR FLEXIBILITY" , 1979 .

[87]  A. Rubinstein,et al.  Rationalizing choice functions by multiple rationales , 2002 .

[88]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Induced binary probabilities and the linear ordering polytope: a status report , 1992 .

[89]  Pietro Ortoleva,et al.  Deliberately Stochastic , 2017, American Economic Review.

[90]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior , 1989 .

[91]  Pietro Ortoleva,et al.  Stochastic Choice and Preferences for Randomization , 2015, Journal of Political Economy.

[92]  Bounded Rationality and Limited Datasets , 2014 .