Selective Removal of DNA from Dead Cells of Mixed Bacterial Communities by Use of Ethidium Monoazide

ABSTRACT The distinction between viable and dead bacterial cells poses a major challenge in microbial diagnostics. Due to the persistence of DNA in the environment after cells have lost viability, DNA-based quantification methods overestimate the number of viable cells in mixed populations or even lead to false-positive results in the absence of viable cells. On the other hand, RNA-based diagnostic methods, which circumvent this problem, are technically demanding and suffer from some drawbacks. A promising and easy-to-use alternative utilizing the DNA-intercalating dye ethidium monoazide bromide (EMA) was published recently. This chemical is known to penetrate only into “dead” cells with compromised cell membrane integrity. Subsequent photoinduced cross-linking was reported to inhibit PCR amplification of DNA from dead cells. We provide evidence here that in addition to inhibition of amplification, most of the DNA from dead cells is actually lost during the DNA extraction procedure, probably together with cell debris which goes into the pellet fraction. Exposure of bacteria to increasing stress and higher proportions of dead cells in defined populations led to increasing loss of genomic DNA. Experiments were performed using Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium as model pathogens and using real-time PCR for their quantification. Results showed that EMA treatment of mixed populations of these two species provides a valuable tool for selective removal of DNA of nonviable cells by using conventional extraction protocols. Furthermore, we provide evidence that prior to denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, EMA treatment of a mature mixed-population drinking-water biofilm containing a substantial proportion of dead cells can result in community fingerprints dramatically different from those for an untreated biofilm. The interpretation of such fingerprints can have important implications in the field of microbial ecology.

[1]  V. Sharma,et al.  Detection of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 by using a multiplex real-time PCR assay for genes encoding intimin and Shiga toxins. , 2003, Veterinary microbiology.

[2]  D. Deere,et al.  Go with the flow – use of flow cytometry in environmental microbiology , 1997 .

[3]  T. Abee,et al.  Assessment of viability of microorganisms employing fluorescence techniques. , 2000, International journal of food microbiology.

[4]  D. M. Ward,et al.  Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis Profiles of 16 S rRNA-Defined Populations Inhabiting a Hot Spring Microbial Mat Community , 1996 .

[5]  B. Mackey,et al.  Detection of mRNA by Reverse Transcription-PCR as an Indicator of Viability in Escherichia coliCells , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  D. Kell,et al.  Viability and activity in readily culturable bacteria: a review and discussion of the practical issues , 1998, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[7]  Knut Rudi,et al.  Ethidium monoazide for DNA-based differentiation of viable and dead bacteria by 5'-nuclease PCR. , 2003, BioTechniques.

[8]  J. Gaubatz,et al.  Demonstration of specific high affinity binding sites in plasmid DNA by photoaffinity labeling with an ethidium analog. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[9]  W. Bolton,et al.  Comparison of cell viability probes compatible with fixation and permeabilization for combined surface and intracellular staining in flow cytometry. , 1995, Cytometry.

[10]  Roland Brousseau,et al.  Molecular Biology and DNA Microarray Technology for Microbial Quality Monitoring of Water , 2004, Critical reviews in microbiology.

[11]  Knut Rudi,et al.  Use of Ethidium Monoazide and PCR in Combination for Quantification of Viable and Dead Cells in Complex Samples , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[12]  W. E. White,et al.  Selective covalent binding of an ethidium analog to mitochondrial DNA with production of petite mutants in yeast by photoaffinity labelling. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  K L Josephson,et al.  Polymerase chain reaction detection of nonviable bacterial pathogens , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  Sébastien Flavier,et al.  Establishment of a Real-Time PCR-Based Approach for Accurate Quantification of Bacterial RNA Targets in Water, Using Salmonella as a Model Organism , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[15]  J. Belasco,et al.  1 – mRNA Degradation in Prokaryotic Cells: An Overview , 1993 .

[16]  Stephens,et al.  Assessment of bacterial viability status by flow cytometry and single cell sorting , 1998, Journal of applied microbiology.

[17]  J. Belasco,et al.  Control of messenger RNA stability. , 1993 .

[18]  M. Waring,et al.  Complex formation between ethidium bromide and nucleic acids. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  C. Stewart,et al.  Use of a photolabeling technique to identify nonviable cells in fixed homologous or heterologous cell populations. , 1991, Cytometry.

[20]  P. Bolton,et al.  Spectroscopic properties of ethidium monoazide: a fluorescent photoaffinity label for nucleic acids. , 1978, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  S. Tzipori,et al.  β-Tubulin mRNA as a Marker ofCryptosporidium parvum Oocyst Viability , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  Pierre Servais,et al.  Detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water: current methods and emerging approaches. , 2002, Journal of microbiological methods.

[23]  B. Mackey,et al.  Effect of stress treatments on the detection of Listeria monocytogenes and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli by the polymerase chain reaction. , 1994, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[24]  K. Peltonen,et al.  Determination of Complement-Mediated Killing of Bacteria by Viability Staining and Bioluminescence , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[25]  S. Drømtorp,et al.  Detection of viable and dead Listeria monocytogenes on gouda‐like cheeses by real‐time PCR , 2005, Letters in applied microbiology.

[26]  R. López-Amorós,et al.  Assessment of E. coli and Salmonella viability and starvation by confocal laser microscopy and flow cytometry using rhodamine 123, DiBAC4(3), propidium iodide, and CTC. , 1997, Cytometry.

[27]  Lee-Ann Jaykus,et al.  rRNA Stability in Heat-Killed and UV-Irradiated EnterotoxigenicStaphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coliO157:H7 , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[28]  N. Ashbolt,et al.  The use of a ribosomal RNA targeted oligonucleotide probe for fluorescent labelling of viable Cryptosporidiumparvum oocysts , 1998, Journal of applied microbiology.

[29]  P. Stewart,et al.  Physiological assessment of bacteria using fluorochromes. , 1995, Journal of microbiological methods.

[30]  J. S. Brand,et al.  Characterization of azidobenzamidines as photoaffinity labels for trypsin. , 1978, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[31]  G. Pettipher,et al.  Rapid Membrane Filtration-Epifluorescent Microscopy Technique for Direct Enumeration of Bacteria in Raw Milk , 1980, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[32]  Pietro Alifano,et al.  Control of mRNA processing and decay in prokaryotes , 2005, Genetica.