Compassion Fade: Affect and Charity Are Greatest for a Single Child in Need

Charitable giving in 2013 exceeded $300 billion, but why do we respond to some life-saving causes while ignoring others? In our first two studies, we demonstrated that valuation of lives is associated with affective feelings (self-reported and psychophysiological) and that a decline in compassion may begin with the second endangered life. In Study 3, this fading of compassion was reversed by describing multiple lives in a more unitary fashion. Study 4 extended our findings to loss-frame scenarios. Our capacity to feel sympathy for people in need appears limited, and this form of compassion fatigue can lead to apathy and inaction, consistent with what is seen repeatedly in response to many large-scale human and environmental catastrophes.

[1]  P. Bloom.  How do morals change? , 2010, Nature.

[2]  L. Nadel,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience of emotion , 2000 .

[3]  M. Cabanac.  Pleasure: the common currency. , 1992, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  John M. Frost,et al.  Moral heuristics. Commentaries. Author's reply , 2005 .

[5]  Emiliana R. Simon-Thomas,et al.  Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  K. Scherer,et al.  Handbook of affective sciences. , 2003 .

[7]  R. S. Rosomoff,et al.  The life you save may be your own. , 1996, The Clinical journal of pain.

[8]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  Insensitivity to the Value of Human Life: A Study of Psychophysical Numbing , 1997 .

[9]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Valuations of human lives: normative expectations and psychological mechanisms of (ir)rationality , 2012, Synthese.

[10]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[11]  B. Payne,et al.  Escaping affect: how motivated emotion regulation creates insensitivity to mass suffering. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Sara D. Hodges,et al.  Compassion fade and the challenge of environmental conservation , 2013, Judgment and Decision Making.

[13]  George Loewenstein,et al.  The devil you know: the effects of identifiability on punishment , 2005 .

[14]  R. Hoskins,et al.  Neural Responses to Taxation and Voluntary Giving Reveal Motives for Charitable Donations , 2007 .

[15]  C. Batson.  The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer , 1991 .

[16]  Paul Slovic,et al.  “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[17]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Irrational Economist: Making Decisions in a Dangerous World , 2010 .

[18]  Peter Singer,et al.  The Life You Can Save , 2009 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[20]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .

[21]  Yuval Rottenstreich,et al.  Multiple-Unit Holdings Yield Attenuated Endowment Effects , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  Conceptualizing and experiencing compassion. , 2013, Emotion.

[23]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Affect, Moral Intuition, and Risk , 2010 .

[24]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Neural Underpinnings of the Identifiable Victim Effect: Affect Shifts Preferences for Giving , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  D. Kahneman.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[27]  Katherine Burson,et al.  More for the Many: The Influence of Entitativity on Charitable Giving , 2013 .

[28]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability , 2003 .

[29]  P. Slovic,et al.  Psychic numbing and mass atrocity , 2013 .

[30]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[31]  Jonathan Evans.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  The ''Identified Victim'' Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual? , 2005 .

[33]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Feature Fatigue: When Product Capabilities Become Too Much of a Good Thing , 2005 .

[34]  T. Singer,et al.  The Social Neuroscience of Empathy , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[35]  C. Windischberger,et al.  The Human Factor: Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Humanized Perception in Moral Decision Making , 2012, PloS one.

[36]  P. Slovic,et al.  Affective Motivations to Help Others: A Two-Stage Model of Donation Decisions , 2011 .

[37]  Joshua D. Greene.  Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them , 2001 .

[38]  J. Andreoni.  IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS: A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING* , 1990 .

[39]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Attentional mechanisms in the generation of sympathy , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[40]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  J. Prinz,et al.  The emotional basis of moral judgments , 2006 .

[42]  T. Singer,et al.  The role of emotions for moral judgments depends on the type of emotion and moral scenario. , 2012, Emotion.

[43]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  How social an animal? The human capacity for caring. , 1990 .

[44]  S. Paradiso.  The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life , 1998 .

[45]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[46]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: Behavior, feeling, and physiology , 2000 .

[47]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The More Who Die, the Less We Care: Evidence from Natural Language Analysis of Online News Articles and Social Media Posts , 2020, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[48]  J. Halford,et al.  Measuring food intake, hunger, satiety and satiation in the laboratory , 2009 .

[49]  N. Srinivasan,et al.  Role of affect in decision making. , 2013, Progress in brain research.

[50]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[51]  Barry D. Smith.  Extraversion and electrodermal activity: arousability and the inverted-U , 1983 .

[52]  Donald J. Baumann,et al.  Mood influences on helping: Direct effects or side effects? , 1984 .

[53]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect , 1997 .

[54]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Intuitive and Deliberate Judgments Are Based on Common Principles This Article Has Been Corrected. See Last Page , 2022 .

[55]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[56]  T. Singer.  The neuroscience of social emotions: From overcoming emotional egocentricity to training empathy and compassion , 2014 .

[57]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[58]  C. Sunstein,et al.  moral heuristics , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[59]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Perceiving persons and groups. , 1996, Psychological review.

[60]  J. Tecce.  Psychophysiology: Human behavior and physiological response , 1996 .

[61]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Money, Kisses, and Electric Shocks: On the Affective Psychology of Risk , 2001, Psychological science.

[62]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[63]  P. Slovic,et al.  Affect and decision making: A hot topic , 2006 .

[64]  E. Shafir.  The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy , 2013 .

[65]  J. Grafman,et al.  Human fronto–mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.