Combination methods of tropospheric time series

Abstract In this article we present two methods for combination of different Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) Zenith Total Delay (ZTD) time-series for the same GNSS site, but from different producers or different processing setups. One method has been setup at ASI/CGS, the other at KNMI. Using Near Real-Time (NRT) ZTD data covering 1 year from the E-GVAP project, the performance of the two methods is inter-compared and validation is made against a combined ZTD solution from EUREF, based on post-processed ZTDs. Further, validation of the ASI combined solutions is made against independent ZTDs derived from radiosonde, Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) model and Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) ZTD. It is found that the two combined solutions perform quite similar, with a bias from −0.17 mm to 1.52 mm and a standard deviation from 1.60 mm to 3.82 mm. Compared with respect to EUREF post-processed solutions, the NRT combined solutions shows a small but positive bias which could be due to a different way of dealing with phase ambiguities in the data reduction process. Further, it is found that the ASI combined solution compares better to both radiosonde, NWP model and VLBI ZTDs than the individual time-series upon which it is based. It is concluded that the combined NRT solutions appear a promising tool for rapid control of the NRT ZTDs produced today by a number of Analysis Centres (ACs) across Europe for use in meteorology. It is known that the NRT processing is prone to certain types of errors rarely seen in post-processing. These errors can lead to a large number of ZTDs from a given AC having correlated errors, which can do serious damage if the data are used in Numerical Weather Prediction, even if it is a rare occurrence. Identification and blocking of such data is therefore a goal in the NRT GNSS data processing and validation.

[1]  Holger Vömel,et al.  Radiation Dry Bias of the Vaisala RS92 Humidity Sensor , 2007 .

[2]  R. Pacione,et al.  Comparative Studies for the Assessment of the Quality of Near-Real-Time GPS-Derived Atmospheric Parameters , 2008 .

[3]  R. Haas,et al.  An inter-comparison study to estimate zenith wet delays using VLBI, GPS, and NWP models , 2000 .

[4]  J. Saastamoinen.  Contributions to the theory of atmospheric refraction , 1972 .

[5]  P. Steigenberger,et al.  Absolute phase center corrections of satellite and receiver antennas , 2005 .

[6]  S. Clough,et al.  Dry Bias and Variability in Vaisala RS80-H Radiosondes: The ARM Experience , 2003 .

[7]  A. Niell.  Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths , 1996 .

[8]  Chris Rizos,et al.  The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of Global Navigation Satellite Systems , 2009 .

[9]  D. S. MacMillan,et al.  Atmospheric gradients from very long baseline interferometry observations , 1995 .

[10]  Henrik Vedel,et al.  Accuracy and Variability of GPS Tropospheric Delay Measurements of Water Vapor in the Western Mediterranean , 2003 .

[11]  H. Schuh,et al.  Troposphere mapping functions for GPS and very long baseline interferometry from European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts operational analysis data , 2006 .

[12]  Dirk Behrend,et al.  The International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry (IVS): current capabilities and future prospects , 2007 .

[13]  Gunnar Elgered,et al.  Climate monitoring using GPS , 2002 .

[14]  E. Brockmann,et al.  The EUREF-EUMETNET Collaboration: First experience and Potential Benefits , 2009 .

[15]  Kristian Mogensen,et al.  Calculation of zenith delays from meteorological data comparison of NWP model, radiosonde and GPS delays , 2001 .

[16]  Jim R. Ray,et al.  On the precision and accuracy of IGS orbits , 2009 .

[17]  Gunnar Elgered,et al.  COST 716: Exploitation of ground-based GPS for operational numerical weather prediction and climate applications , 2005 .

[18]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Comparisons of homogeneously reprocessed GPS and VLBI long time-series of troposphere zenith delays and gradients , 2007 .

[19]  Harald Schuh,et al.  IVS Pilot Project - Tropospheric Parameters , 2003 .

[20]  R. Haas,et al.  Multi-technique comparison of tropospheric zenith delays derived during the CONT02 campaign , 2006 .

[21]  David Carlson,et al.  Corrections of Humidity Measurement Errors from the Vaisala RS80 Radiosonde—Application to TOGA COARE Data , 2002 .

[22]  Galina Dick,et al.  Near Real Time GPS Water Vapor Monitoring for Numerical Weather Prediction in Germany , 2004 .

[23]  R. Pacione,et al.  GPS Zenith Total Delay Estimation in the Mediterranean Area for Climatological and Meteorological Applications , 2003 .

[24]  U. Hugentobler,et al.  IGS ultra rapid products for (near-) real-time applications , 2001 .

[25]  R. Pacione,et al.  Comparison of atmospheric parameters derived from GPS, VLBI and a ground-based microwave radiometer in Italy , 2002 .

[26]  Richard B. Langley,et al.  Comparison of Measurements of Atmospheric Wet Delay by Radiosonde, Water Vapor Radiometer, GPS, and VLBI , 2001 .

[27]  Y. Bar-Sever,et al.  Estimating horizontal gradients of tropospheric path delay with a single GPS receiver , 1998 .