Analysis and experiments for a system of two spacecraft paired by means of a flexible link

Abstract A field of current interest in space technology is the on-orbit operation concept, often requiring that a chaser spacecraft captures a target spacecraft. The physical link connecting the two satellites is usually characterized by a high degree of flexibility, because of the special requirements imposed to the space systems, and specifically the constraints on the mass at launch. The focus of this paper is the study of an attitude control of the paired spacecraft system such that the elastic oscillations do not interfere with the attitude dynamics, and the final configuration is reached without residual vibrations. At the scope, a rest-to-rest techniques, that requires an accurate description of the dynamic model of the paired satellites as a flexible multibody setup, is applied. The results of this control are first tested by means of a numerical tool, simulating nominal and non-nominal scenarios. Then the identified control is proved in an experimental test-bed, consisting of two free-floating platforms connected by means of an elastic joint. The performance of the rest-to-rest technique is compared to other classical control laws aiming to minimally excite the system undesired dynamics, showing a promising superiority.

[1]  Ou Ma,et al.  A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing , 2014 .

[2]  William Singhose,et al.  Experimental Verification of Real-Time Control for Flexible Systems With On-Off Actuators , 2006 .

[3]  Kazuya Yoshida,et al.  Space Robot Impact Analysis and Satellite-Base Impulse Minimization Using Reaction Null-Space , 1995, ICRA.

[4]  S. Ali A. Moosavian,et al.  Multiple Impedance Control for Space Free-Flying Robots , 2005 .

[5]  Keum-Shik Hong,et al.  Command Shaping Control for Limiting the Transient Sway Angle of Crane Systems , 2003 .

[6]  Kazuya Yoshida,et al.  Momentum distribution in a space manipulator for facilitating the post-impact control , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[7]  Giovanni B. Palmerini,et al.  Flexibility issues in discrete on-off actuated spacecraft: Numerical and experimental tests , 2014 .

[8]  Marco Sabatini,et al.  A testbed for visual based navigation and control during space rendezvous operations , 2015 .

[9]  Inna Sharf,et al.  Reactionless Path Planning Strategies for Capture of Tumbling Objects in Space Using a Dual-Arm Robotic System , 2013 .

[10]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Adaptive Postcapture Backstepping Control for Tumbling Tethered Space Robot–Target Combination , 2016 .

[11]  G. Palmerini,et al.  A reaction-null/Jacobian transpose control strategy with gravity gradient compensation for on-orbit space manipulators , 2014 .

[12]  Panfeng Huang,et al.  Coordinated stabilization of tumbling targets using tethered space manipulators , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[13]  A. De Luca,et al.  Rest-to-rest motion of a two-link robot with a flexible forearm , 2001, AIM 2001.

[14]  Panfeng Huang,et al.  Dynamic modelling and coordinated controller designing for the manoeuvrable tether-net space robot system , 2016 .

[15]  Mason A. Peck,et al.  Historical review of air-bearing spacecraft simulators , 2003 .

[16]  Kenji Nagaoka,et al.  Impedance-based contact control of a free-flying space robot with a compliant wrist for non-cooperative satellite capture , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[17]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  Optimal motion planning for free-flying robots , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[18]  Kai Chen,et al.  Optimal Path Planning for Minimizing Disturbance of Space Robot , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision.

[19]  Giovanni B. Palmerini,et al.  Visual based navigation of a free floating robot by means of a lab star tracker , 2015, 2015 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO).

[20]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Rest-to-rest motion of a one-link flexible arm , 2001, AIM 2001.

[21]  S. Desa,et al.  A Global Approach for Using Kinematic Redundancy to Minimize Base Reactions of Manipulators , 1989 .

[22]  Giovanni B. Palmerini,et al.  Design of robotic manipulators for orbit removal of spent launchers’ stages , 2016 .

[23]  Yangsheng Xu,et al.  Survey of modeling, planning, and ground verification of space robotic systems , 2011 .

[24]  Paolo Gasbarri,et al.  Elastic issues and vibration reduction in a tethered deorbiting mission , 2016 .

[25]  Giovanni B. Palmerini,et al.  Delay compensation for controlling flexible space multibodies: Dynamic modeling and experiments , 2015 .

[26]  Marcel J. Sidi,et al.  Spacecraft Dynamics and Control: A Practical Engineering Approach , 1997 .