Evading quantum mechanics

Quantum mechanics is potentially advantageous for certain information-processing tasks, but its probabilistic nature and requirement of measurement back action often limit the precision of conventional classical information-processing devices, such as sensors and atomic clocks. Here we show that by engineering the dynamics of coupled quantum systems, it is possible to construct a subsystem that evades the measurement back action of quantum mechanics, at all times of interest, and obeys any classical dynamics, linear or nonlinear, that we choose. We call such a system a quantum-mechanics-free subsystem (QMFS). All of the observables of a QMFS are quantum-nondemolition (QND) observables; moreover, they are dynamical QND observables, thus demolishing the widely held belief that QND observables are constants of motion. QMFSs point to a new strategy for designing classical information-processing devices in regimes where quantum noise is detrimental, unifying previous approaches that employ QND observables, back-action evasion, and quantum noise cancellation. Potential applications include gravitational-wave detection, optomechanical force sensing, atomic magnetometry, and classical computing. Demonstrations of dynamical QMFSs include the generation of broad-band squeezed light for use in interferometric gravitational-wave detection, experiments using entangled atomic spin ensembles, and implementations of the quantum Toffoli gate.

[1]  Luigi Frunzio,et al.  Realization of three-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting circuits , 2011, Nature.

[2]  Timothy C. Ralph,et al.  Quantum information with continuous variables , 2000, Conference Digest. 2000 International Quantum Electronics Conference (Cat. No.00TH8504).

[3]  B. O. Koopman,et al.  Hamiltonian Systems and Transformation in Hilbert Space. , 1931, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Matthew R. James,et al.  An Introduction to Quantum Filtering , 2006, SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization.

[5]  Pérès Quantum limited detectors for weak classical signals. , 1989, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[6]  W. Unruh QUANTUM NONDEMOLITION AND GRAVITY WAVE DETECTION , 1979 .

[7]  Tommaso Toffoli,et al.  Reversible Computing , 1980, ICALP.

[8]  P. Benioff Quantum mechanical hamiltonian models of turing machines , 1982 .

[9]  Schumaker,et al.  New formalism for two-photon quantum optics. I. Quadrature phases and squeezed states. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[10]  Mark S. C. Reed,et al.  Method of Modern Mathematical Physics , 1972 .

[11]  C. Caves,et al.  Coherent quantum-noise cancellation for optomechanical sensors. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[12]  M. Reed Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. I: Functional Analysis , 1972 .

[13]  V. Sandberg,et al.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF A WEAK CLASSICAL FORCE COUPLED TO A QUANTUM MECHANICAL OSCILLATOR. I. ISSUES OF PRINCIPLE , 1980 .

[14]  K Hammerer,et al.  Establishing Einstein-Poldosky-Rosen channels between nanomechanics and atomic ensembles. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[15]  S. Lloyd Quantum-Mechanical Computers , 1995 .

[16]  H. Yuen Quantum detection and estimation theory , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  L. Ballentine,et al.  Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory , 1982 .

[18]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[19]  G J Milburn,et al.  Decoherence and the conditions for the classical control of quantum systems , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  P. Benioff The computer as a physical system: A microscopic quantum mechanical Hamiltonian model of computers as represented by Turing machines , 1980 .

[21]  Vladimir B. Braginsky,et al.  Quantum Measurement , 1992 .

[22]  C. Monroe Demolishing quantum nondemolition , 2011 .

[23]  B. Julsgaard,et al.  Experimental long-lived entanglement of two macroscopic objects , 2001, Nature.

[24]  K. Jensen,et al.  Quantum noise limited and entanglement-assisted magnetometry , 2009, CLEO/QELS: 2010 Laser Science to Photonic Applications.

[25]  Berkeley,et al.  Decoherence-Free Subspaces and Subsystems , 2003, quant-ph/0301032.

[26]  W. Zurek Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical , 2001, quant-ph/0105127.

[27]  Jeffrey H. Shapiro,et al.  Phase and amplitude uncertainties in heterodyne detection , 1984 .

[28]  Carlton M. Caves,et al.  Fundamental quantum limit to waveform estimation , 2010, CLEO: 2011 - Laser Science to Photonic Applications.

[29]  Claus Kiefer,et al.  Quantum Measurement and Control , 2010 .

[30]  Marcus P. da Silva,et al.  Implementation of a Toffoli gate with superconducting circuits , 2011, Nature.

[31]  N. Mermin Quantum theory: Concepts and methods , 1997 .

[32]  V. P. Belavkin,et al.  Nondemolition principle of quantum measurement theory , 1994 .

[33]  T. Monz,et al.  Realization of the quantum Toffoli gate with trapped ions. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[34]  Karsten Danzmann,et al.  Observation of squeezed states with strong photon-number oscillations , 2009, 0909.5386.

[35]  K. Thorne,et al.  Quantum Nondemolition Measurements , 1980, Science.

[36]  Schumaker,et al.  New formalism for two-photon quantum optics. II. Mathematical foundation and compact notation. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.