Dynamics of a non-autonomous density-dependent predator–prey model with Beddington–DeAngelis type

The goal of this paper is to investigate the dynamics of a non-autonomous density-dependent predator–prey system with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response, where not only the prey density dependence but also the predator density dependence are considered, such that the studied predator–prey system conforms to the realistically biological environment. We firstly introduce a sufficient condition for the permanence of the system and then use a specific set to obtain a weaker sufficient condition. Afterward, we provide corresponding conditions for the extinction of the system and the existence of boundary periodical solutions, respectively. Further, we get a sufficient condition for global attractiveness of the boundary periodic solution by constructing a Lyapunov function, arriving at the uniqueness of boundary periodic solutions since the uniqueness of boundary periodic solutions can be ensured by global attractiveness. Finally, based on the existence of positive periodic solutions, which can be ensured by the Brouwer fixed-point theorem, we provide a sufficient condition for the uniqueness of positive periodic solutions.

[1]  Manju Agarwal,et al.  PERSISTENCE IN A RATIO-DEPENDENT PREDATOR-PREY-RESOURCE MODEL WITH STAGE STRUCTURE FOR PREY , 2010 .

[2]  Yang Kuang,et al.  Dynamics of a nonautonomous predator-prey system with the Beddington-DeAngelis functional response , 2004 .

[3]  Chris Cosner,et al.  On the Dynamics of Predator–Prey Models with the Beddington–DeAngelis Functional Response☆ , 2001 .

[4]  Qian Wang,et al.  Dynamics of a non-autonomous ratio-dependent predator—prey system , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics.

[5]  Shengqiang Liu,et al.  A Stage-structured Predator-prey Model of Beddington-DeAngelis Type , 2006, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[6]  Huaiping Zhu,et al.  Bifurcation Analysis of a Predator-Prey System with Nonmonotonic Functional Response , 2003, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[7]  Tzy-Wei Hwang,et al.  Global analysis of the predator–prey system with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response , 2003 .

[8]  S. Kakutani.  A generalization of Brouwer’s fixed point theorem , 1941 .

[9]  Matthijs Vos,et al.  Functional responses modified by predator density , 2009, Oecologia.

[10]  Zhikun She,et al.  Uniqueness of periodic solutions of a nonautonomous density-dependent predator–prey system , 2015 .

[11]  J. Beddington,et al.  Mutual Interference Between Parasites or Predators and its Effect on Searching Efficiency , 1975 .

[12]  Fengde Chen,et al.  GLOBAL ANALYSIS OF A HARVESTED PREDATOR–PREY MODEL INCORPORATING A CONSTANT PREY REFUGE , 2010 .

[13]  Zhikun She,et al.  Dynamics of a density-dependent stage-structured predator–prey system with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response , 2013 .

[14]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES WITH PREDATOR INTERFERENCE: VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE HOLLING TYPE II MODEL , 2001 .

[15]  Tzy-Wei Hwang,et al.  Uniqueness of limit cycles of the predator–prey system with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response , 2004 .

[16]  Jim M Cushing,et al.  Periodic Time-Dependent Predator-Prey Systems , 1977 .

[17]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  A Model for Tropic Interaction , 1975 .