论文信息 - Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments.

Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments.

OBJECTIVE We compared the performance of damping capacity assessment (Periotest device) to resonance frequency analysis (Osstell device) in the assessment of peri-implant bone loss in an in vitro experiment. MATERIAL AND METHODS Screw-type oral implants were polymerized into acrylic blocks. Peri-implant bone loss was simulated by successively removing defined portions of material surrounding the implants in millimeter increments. Measurement values of both devices were compared by assessing the associated measurement errors, by calculating correlation analyses and drawing scatterplots, and by means of regression analysis referring to increasing bone loss. RESULTS Both devices produced comparable results suggesting agreement of the measured implant stability values to the actual loss of peri-implant resin. There was a noticeable correlation of the Periotest and Osstell implant stability values. CONCLUSION The results of this experiment suggest agreement in predicting the actual implant stability with both the instruments with the Osstell instrument being the more precise device.

[1] H. Gröndahl,et al. Agreement between panoramic and intra-oral radiography in the assessment of marginal bone height. , 1991, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[2] Douglas G Altman,et al. Statistics Notes: Units of analysis , 1997, BMJ.

[3] W Schulte,et al. [Periotest--a new measurement process for periodontal function]. , 1983, Zahnarztliche Mitteilungen.

[4] G. Gómez-Román,et al. Influence of the implant abutment on the Periotest value: an in vivo study. , 2001, Quintessence international.

[5] N Meredith,et al. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[6] C Aparicio,et al. Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability. , 1990, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7] T G Wilson,et al. Biological complications with dental implants: their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[8] L. Sennerby,et al. Histology of retrieved immediately and early loaded oxidized implants: light microscopic observations after 5 to 9 months of loading in the posterior mandible. , 2003, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[9] P. Eickholz,et al. Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. , 2000, European journal of oral sciences.