Mobile-bearing insert reduced patellar contact force at knee flexion during posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

[1]  T. Matsushita,et al.  The influence of intraoperative soft tissue balance on patellar pressure in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. , 2016, The Knee.

[2]  Eiichi Nakamura,et al.  In vivo kinematic comparison between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty during step-up activity. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  N. Johanson,et al.  Decreased ratios of lateral to medial patellofemoral forces and pressures after lateral retinacular release and gender knees in total knee arthroplasty , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[4]  B. Pongcharoen,et al.  Patellar Tracking and Anterior Knee Pain are Similar After Medial Parapatellar and Midvastus Approaches in Minimally Invasive TKA , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  T. Matsushita,et al.  Kinematic factors affecting postoperative knee flexion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty , 2013, International Orthopaedics.

[6]  B. Pongcharoen,et al.  Erratum to: Patellar Tracking and Anterior Knee Pain are Similar After Medial Parapatellar and Midvastus Approaches in Minimally Invasive TKA , 2013 .

[7]  D. Beverland,et al.  LCS mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Does the unresurfaced patella affect outcome? Survivorship at a minimum 10-year follow-up. , 2012, The Knee.

[8]  Akio Minami,et al.  Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty improves patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact stress: in vivo measurements in the same patients. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  S. Fuchs-Winkelmann,et al.  Differences in patellofemoral contact stresses between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a dynamic in vitro measurement , 2009, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[10]  D. Dennis,et al.  Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: design factors in minimizing wear. , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  D. Beard,et al.  Real In Vivo Kinematic Differences between Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasties , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  Mohamed R Mahfouz,et al.  A Multicenter Analysis of Axial Femorotibial Rotation after Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  F. Buechel.  Mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty: rotation is our salvation! , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  M. Archibeck,et al.  Indications for Lateral Retinacular Release in Total Knee Replacement , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  R. Laskin.  Lateral Release Rates After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  D A Dennis,et al.  Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. , 2000, Instructional course lectures.

[17]  R C Johnston,et al.  Cemented Rotating-Platform Total Knee Replacement: A Nine to Twelve-Year Follow-up Study* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  M. S. Hefzy,et al.  Effects of tibial rotations on patellar tracking and patello-femoral contact areas. , 1992, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[19]  F. C. Ewald.  Leg-lift technique for simultaneous femoral, tibial, and patellar prosthetic cementing, “rule of no thumb ” for patellar tracking, and steel rod rule for ligament tension , 1991 .

[20]  M. Kurosaka,et al.  Navigation-based femorotibial rotation pattern correlated with flexion angle after total knee arthroplasty , 2014, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[21]  A. Rothwell,et al.  The low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective study with a minimum follow-up of ten years. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[22]  F. F. Buechel,et al.  The New Jersey low-contact-stress knee replacement system: Biomechanical rationale and review of the first 123 cemented cases , 2004, Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery.