Computer and Information Sciences

The 31st International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences was held during October 27–28, 2016, in Krakow, Poland, under the auspices of the Institute of Theoretical and Applied Informatics of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Gliwice and of Imperial College, London. This was the 31st event in the ISCIS series of conferences that have brought together computer scientists from around the world, including Ankara, Izmir, and Antalya in Turkey, Orlando, Florida, Paris, London, and Krakow. Thus this conference follows the tradition of very successful previous annual editions, and most recently ISCIS 2015, ISCIS 2014, ISCIS 2013, ISCIS 2012, ISCIS 2011, and ISCIS 2010. The proceedings of previous editions have been included in major research indexes, such as ISI WoS, DBLP, and Google Scholar. ISCIS 2016 included three invited keynote presentations by leading contributors to the field of computer science, as well as peer-reviewed contributed research papers. The program was established from the submitted papers, and covered relevant and timely aspects of computer science and engineering research, with a clear contribution presenting experimental evidence or theoretical developments and proofs that support the claims of the paper. The topics included in this year’s edition included computer architectures and digital systems, algorithms, theory, software engineering, data engineering, computational intelligence, system security, computer systems and networks, performance modelling and analysis, distributed and parallel systems, bioinformatics, computer vision, and significant applications such as medical informatics and imaging. All the accepted papers were peer reviewed by two or three referees and evaluated on the basis of technical quality, relevance, significance, and clarity. The organizers and proceedings editors thank the dedicated Program Committee members and other reviewers for their contributions, and would especially like to thank all those who submitted papers, even though only a fraction could be accepted. We also thank Springer for producing these high-quality proceedings of ISCIS 2016.

[1]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[2]  Usama M. Fayyad,et al.  Multi-Interval Discretization of Continuous-Valued Attributes for Classification Learning , 1993, IJCAI.

[3]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[4]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  Examination Timetabling: Algorithmic Strategies and Applications , 1994 .

[5]  D. Kibler,et al.  Instance-based learning algorithms , 2004, Machine Learning.

[6]  Arthur Charguéraud,et al.  Engineering formal metatheory , 2008, POPL '08.

[7]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[8]  Alberto Maria Segre,et al.  Programs for Machine Learning , 1994 .

[9]  S. Kotsiantis,et al.  Discretization Techniques: A recent survey , 2006 .

[10]  Michel Gendreau,et al.  Hyper-heuristics: a survey of the state of the art , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  I.N. Bozkurt,et al.  Authorship attribution , 2007, 2007 22nd international symposium on computer and information sciences.

[12]  Pat Langley,et al.  Estimating Continuous Distributions in Bayesian Classifiers , 1995, UAI.

[13]  Sanja Petrovic,et al.  HyFlex: A Benchmark Framework for Cross-Domain Heuristic Search , 2011, EvoCOP.

[14]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Generating Accurate Rule Sets Without Global Optimization , 1998, ICML.

[15]  Ender Özcan,et al.  An iterated multi-stage selection hyper-heuristic , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Katarzyna Harezlak,et al.  On Approaches to Discretization of Datasets Used for Evaluation of Decision Systems , 2016 .

[17]  Ashwin Srinivasan,et al.  Theories for Mutagenicity: A Study in First-Order and Feature-Based Induction , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[18]  Graham Kendall,et al.  A Hyperheuristic Approach to Scheduling a Sales Summit , 2000, PATAT.

[19]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  New Models for Pseudo Self-Similar Traffic , 1997, Perform. Evaluation.

[20]  P. Medawar A view from the left , 1984, Nature.

[21]  Urszula Stanczyk,et al.  Ranking of characteristic features in combined wrapper approaches to selection , 2014, Neural Computing and Applications.

[22]  Ender Özcan,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of hyper-heuristics , 2008, Intell. Data Anal..

[23]  Ender Özcan,et al.  An Experimental Study on Hyper-heuristics and Exam Timetabling , 2006, PATAT.

[24]  Sergei Soloviev,et al.  Inductive Type Schemas as Functors , 2006, CSR.

[25]  Igor Kononenko,et al.  On Biases in Estimating Multi-Valued Attributes , 1995, IJCAI.

[26]  Grzegorz Baron,et al.  Influence of Data Discretization on Efficiency of Bayesian Classifier for Authorship Attribution , 2014, KES.

[27]  Shlomo Argamon,et al.  Computational methods in authorship attribution , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Ashwin Srinivasan,et al.  The Predictive Toxicology Evaluation Challenge , 1997, IJCAI.

[29]  Ender Özcan,et al.  A tensor-based selection hyper-heuristic for cross-domain heuristic search , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[30]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[31]  Urszula Stanczyk Establishing Relevance of Characteristic Features for Authorship Attribution with ANN , 2013, DEXA.

[32]  Conor McBride,et al.  Functional pearl: i am not a number--i am a free variable , 2004, Haskell '04.