Towards unified electromagnetic tracking system assessment-static errors

Recent advances in Image-Guided Surgery allows physicians to incorporate up-to-date, high quality patient data in the surgical decision making, and sometimes to directly perform operations based on pre- or intra-operatively acquired patient images. Electromagnetic tracking is the fastest growing area within, where the position and orientation of tiny sensors can be determined with sub-millimeter accuracy in the field created by a generator. One of the major barriers to the wider spread of electromagnetic tracking solutions is their susceptibility to ferromagnetic materials and external electromagnetic sources. The research community has long been engaged with the topic to find engineering solutions to increase measurement reliability and accuracy. This article gives an overview of related experiments, and presents our recommendation towards a robust method to collect representative data about electromagnetic trackers.

[1]  Andrew D. Wiles,et al.  Accuracy assessment protocols for elektromagnetic tracking systems , 2003, CARS.

[2]  Mark Schneider,et al.  Development and testing of a new magnetic-tracking device for image guidance , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  Christopher Nafis,et al.  Method for evaluating compatibility of commercial electromagnetic (EM) microsensor tracking systems with surgical and imaging tables , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  M. Donat,et al.  Stability of miniature electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  A Direction Space Interpolation Technique for Calibration of Electromagnetic Surgical Navigation Systems , 2003, MICCAI.

[6]  Michelle Harris-Love,et al.  Dynamic Error Analysis of Ascension's Flock of Birds TM Electromagnetic Tracking Device Using a Pendulum Model , 2002 .

[7]  Tamas Haidegger,et al.  Stochastic approach to error estimation for image-guided robotic systems , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[8]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device: a study of the optimal range and metal interference. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  M. Figl,et al.  Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2005, Medical physics.

[10]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  A framework for calibration of electromagnetic surgical navigation system , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[11]  C. Mascott,et al.  Comparison of Magnetic Tracking and Optical Tracking by Simultaneous Use of Two Independent Frameless Stereotactic Systems , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[12]  François Poulin,et al.  Interference during the use of an electromagnetic tracking system under OR conditions. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Christian Schilling,et al.  Assesment of metallic distortions of an electromagnetic tracking system , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  Peter Anderson,et al.  Method for estimating dynamic EM tracking accuracy of surgical navigation tools , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  Gregory S. Fischer,et al.  ELECTROMAGNETIC TRACKER CHARACTERIZATION AND OPTIMAL TOOL DESIGN (WITH APPLICATIONS TO ENT SURGERY) , 2006 .

[16]  H. Meinzer,et al.  Effect of 3D ultrasound probes on the accuracy of electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  A hardware and software protocol for the evaluation of electromagnetic tracker accuracy in the clinical environment: a multi-center study , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[19]  Ziv Yaniv,et al.  A buyer's guide to electromagnetic tracking systems for clinical applications , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[20]  M. Figl,et al.  Evaluation of a new electromagnetic tracking system using a standardized assessment protocol , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.