CFD simulation of large-scale bubble plumes : Comparisons against experiments

Abstract Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have been carried out to simulate a turbulent, bubble plume in a liquid pool. A two-fluid enhanced k – ɛ model has been used, with the extra source terms introduced to account for the interaction between the bubbles and the liquid and transient calculations have been performed to study the plume growth, the acceleration of the liquid due to viscous drag, and the approach to steady-state conditions. In order to obtain correct spreading of the plume observed experimentally, it was observed that interfacial forces like lift and turbulent dispersion plays important role. The sensitivity analysis for drag coefficient and two different turbulent dispersion forces is presented. The development of the flow variables has been compared with the experimental data. From the CFD predictions obtained in the present work, it can be concluded that a two-dimensional (2D) axisymmetric assumption in this case is justified, with 2D model predictions in good agreement with the experimental data and those of a three-dimensional (3D) model, except for the shear stresses and turbulent kinetic energy. In general, quantitative comparison with the experimental data has revealed that, by applying proper models of inter-phase momentum transfer, and performing simulations based on the two-fluid model, satisfactory predictions of mean flow quantities can be obtained for this application away from the injector.

[1]  C. Rhie,et al.  Numerical Study of the Turbulent Flow Past an Airfoil with Trailing Edge Separation , 1983 .

[2]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Two-fluid model and hydrodynamic constitutive relations , 1984 .

[3]  Ng Niels Deen,et al.  Ensemble correlation PIV applied to bubble plumes rising in a bubble column , 1999 .

[4]  S. Becker,et al.  Modelling and simulation of the dynamic flow behaviour in a bubble column , 2001 .

[5]  Yassin A. Hassan,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS OF BOTH COMPONENTS OF A TWO-PHASE FLOW USING PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY , 1992 .

[6]  Malcolm R. Davidson,et al.  Numerical calculations of two-phase flow in a liquid bath with bottom gas injection: The central plume , 1990 .

[7]  Donald A. Drew,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF TWO-PHASE FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFER USING A MULTIDIMENSIONAL, MULTI-FIELD, TWO-FLUID COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) MODEL , 2000 .

[8]  B. Launder,et al.  Mathematical Models of turbulence , 1972 .

[9]  R. Clift,et al.  Bubbles, Drops, and Particles , 1978 .

[10]  Gordon A. Irons,et al.  The impact of bubble dynamics on the flow in plumes of ladle water models , 1995 .

[11]  Marco Simiano,et al.  Experimental investigation of large-scale three dimensional bubble plume dynamics , 2005 .

[12]  N. Zuber,et al.  Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows , 1979 .

[13]  Donald A. Drew,et al.  Averaged Field Equations for Two‐Phase Media , 1971 .

[14]  J. Rensen,et al.  Experimental study of the unsteady structure of a confined bubble plume , 2001 .

[15]  I. Žun,et al.  The mechanism of bubble non-homogeneous distribution in two-phase shear flow , 1990 .

[16]  J. P. V. Doormaal,et al.  ENHANCEMENTS OF THE SIMPLE METHOD FOR PREDICTING INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID FLOWS , 1984 .

[17]  B. Smith,et al.  On the modelling of bubble plumes in a liquid pool , 1998 .

[18]  Donald A. Drew,et al.  The virtual mass and lift force on a sphere in rotating and straining inviscid flow , 1987 .

[19]  F. de Cachard,et al.  Simulating large-scale bubble plumes using various closure and two-phase turbulence models , 2005 .