Using Brunswikian theory and a longitudinal design to study how hierarchical teams adapt to increasing levels of time pressure.

Brunswikian theory and a longitudinal design were used to study how three-person, hierarchical teams adapted to increasing levels of time pressure and, thereby, try to understand why previous team research has not necessarily found a direct relationship between team processes and performance with increasing time pressure. We obtained four principal findings. First, team members initially adapted to increasing time pressure without showing any performance decrements by accelerating their cognitive processing, increasing the amount of their implicit coordination by sending more information without being asked and, to a lesser extent, filtering (omitting) certain activities. Second, teams began and continued to perform the task differently with increasing time pressure, yet often achieved comparable levels of performance. Third, time pressure did affect performance because there was a level of time pressure beyond which performance could not be maintained, although that level differed for different teams. And, fourth, some adaptation strategies were more effective than others at the highest time pressure level. Taken together, these findings support the Brunswikian perspective that one should not necessarily expect a direct relationship between team processes and performance with increasing time pressure because teams adapt their processes in different, yet often equally effective ways, in an effort to maintain high and stable performance.

[1]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. , 1995 .

[2]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Elliot E. Entin,et al.  Adaptive Team Coordination , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Richard Hall,et al.  Distributed Tactical Decisionmaking: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Results , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  E. Brunswik Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. , 1955, Psychological review.

[6]  R. Hastie,et al.  Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments , 1997 .

[7]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Argus: A suite of tools for research in complex cognition , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[8]  Leonard Adelman,et al.  Model for adaptive decision making behavior of distributed hierarchical teams under high temporal workload , 1999 .

[9]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  G. Hockey,et al.  Effects of time-pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: changes in affective state and information processing strategy. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[11]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[12]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[13]  Clint A. Bowers,et al.  Effects of Workload and Structure on Team Processes and Performance: Implications for Complex Team Decision Making , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations , 1995 .

[15]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The Impact of Cross-Training on Team Functioning: An Empirical Investigation , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[17]  E. Brunswik,et al.  The psychology of Egon Brunswik , 1966 .

[18]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Planning, Shared Mental Models, and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link Is Established , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[19]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[20]  Kenneth R. Hammond,et al.  Entangled task dismensions: An impediment to interpersonal learning , 1974 .

[21]  C. Burke,et al.  The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Clint A. Bowers,et al.  The Impact of Cross-Training and Workload on Team Functioning: A Replication and Extension of Initial Findings , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Berndt Brehmer,et al.  Use of experts in complex decision making: A paradigm for the study of staff work , 1986 .

[24]  K. R. Hammond Judgments Under Stress , 1999 .

[25]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Series in Applied Psychology. , 1997 .

[26]  E. Brunswik,et al.  The Conceptual Framework of Psychology , 1954 .