Crestal bone changes on platform-switched implants and adjacent teeth when the tooth-implant distance is less than 1.5 mm.

Because of the peri-implant bone resorption that occurs when a non-platform switched implant is exposed to the oral environment, it has been recommended to maintain 1.5 mm between the tooth and implant to preserve the bone adjacent to the teeth. Several studies have documented that platform-switched implants have less peri-implant bone resorption than matched implants. This retrospective radiographic analysis studied 70 platform-switched implants placed less than 1.5 mm from an adjacent tooth and with prostheses loaded for a minimum of 6 months. The mean distance between the implant and tooth was 0.99 mm (range, 0.20 to 1.49 mm); the mean horizontal and vertical bone resorption was 0.36 and 0.43 mm, respectively. The mean bone peak reduction was 0.37 mm. The results confirm that the use of platform-switched implants reduces bone resorption after two-piece implants have been uncovered and that it is possible to place this type of implant 1 mm from teeth while maintaining the bone level adjacent to them (the bone peak).

[1]  Dennis P Tarnow,et al.  The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platform-switched implants. , 2009, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[2]  Xavier Rodríguez-Ciurana,et al.  Benefits of an Implant Platform Modification Technique to Reduce Crestal Bone Resorption , 2006, Implant dentistry.

[3]  Richard J Lazzara,et al.  Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. , 2006, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[4]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Management of inter-dental/inter-implant papilla. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[5]  C. Misch,et al.  The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? , 2002, Journal of periodontology.

[6]  D. Cochran,et al.  Biologic Width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  D P Tarnow,et al.  The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[8]  D. Cochran,et al.  Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[9]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. , 1996, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[10]  M. Esposito,et al.  Radiological evaluation of marginal bone loss at tooth surfaces facing single Brånemark implants. , 1993, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  H. Hansson,et al.  Structural aspects of the interface between tissue and titanium implants. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.